When I look at your post I see an image 2.5 inches wide. That's too small.

It's 180x120 pixels (pretty small)

What pic are we talking about?

I see an 800 x 532 image.

I'm talking about this one.

Pinstriping. Flames are OK though.

That's the one. Post 3454.

I wonder why that third party site serves up different sizes to different people?
I'm running Firefox.

Chrome and IE also serve it up at that small size for me.

That is weird news.

It's all a bit puzzling.

I uploaded the image at 800x600 as the recommended size for a 15" monitor.
It's a reasonable size for most monitors and is unlikely to fall over the edges of a tablet.
It measures 800x532, but that's neither here nor there.
That displays as approx 8.5" x 6" on this monitor.

I tend to use an image hosting site rather than run up against file size limitations for attachments on the Cellar.
Also, I have a feeling that there might be a limit to the number of attachments permitted.

BTW, I'm using Firefox, and IE displays also displays it perfectly.

I personally prefer attachments because 3rd party sites will stop hosting the pictures eventually as they go out of business, and then the threads are left incomplete. The Cellar abides.

E-commerce, y'know, when ya buy something off the interweb?

The first e-commerce transaction was the sale/purchase of an undetermined amount of sweet, sweet mary jane.

Apparently.

I find that awesome.

Calling Big V, Calling Big V...

You aren't lighting farts up there, I hope?

Not me, this time. Thanks for checking. It was just an inch or so away from me on the map, though. SERIOUS devastation.

Wild chimpanzees show some evidence of ritualized, perhaps religious behavior.


On the other hand, from the article:

Hmm... maybe not so much, Daily Mail.

What's wrong with smartness, Google has 650,000 hits for it.

Smartness sounds wrong, but I just looked it up in both of my dead tree collegiate dictionaries, and it's in there in each. Not as its own entry, but as a form of smart.