The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Drug Wars tooooo close to home! (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=17222)

Undertoad 05-30-2010 08:55 AM

Point is slippery slope is a logical fallacy and must not be used. That is all

jinx 05-30-2010 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redux (Post 659391)
From your opinion piece:

...provided that person is already lawfully detained.

That is the difference between the Court's decision in Muehler v. Mena and the AZ law....and IMO, a significant difference.

Given that difference...

Significant difference? The AZ law states "After lawful contact".

Redux 05-30-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 659422)
Significant difference? The AZ law states "After lawful contact".

Right....and the law makes illegal immigration a state crime, and, in and of itself, a "lawful contact"...and that is the issue.

It is not asking about immigration status after other lawful contact.

If one is already being lawfully detained for questioning in connection to any other crime, I dont think there is an issue of potential discrimination.

If one is solely being detained for questioning based on immigration status as a "lawful contact", I do think there is an issue of potential discrimination. Anglos are not likely be be detained solely on the basis of immigration status being a lawful contact.

And that is the difference the Court should determine.

Cloud 05-30-2010 09:51 AM

and lawful contact is quite different from lawful detention. On such semantic differences turn Supreme Court cases.

and I kind of wish you would all go away and start your own immigration thread, or post about this in the neimroller thread, and leave this thread for discussion of drug wars on the border. Related issues, but not quite the same. I acknowledge my powerlessness on this point though.

jinx 05-30-2010 09:51 AM

I think you're confused.

Sorry Cloud.

Cloud 05-30-2010 09:54 AM

quite possible, but why?

jinx 05-30-2010 10:09 AM

No, no, I think redux is confused - in that asking about immigration status comes after lawful contact for another reason. Sorry to muck up your thread.

Cloud 05-30-2010 10:10 AM

ah.

Redux 05-30-2010 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 659440)
No, no, I think redux is confused - in that asking about immigration status comes after lawful contact for another reason. Sorry to muck up your thread.

"shrug"

I could say the same about you being confused...and neither of us is an expert on the subject.

And I could add, that I didnt make sweeping generalizations. or use a broad brush, questioning the motives and integrity of experts with whom you do not agree.

Sorry for the muck up as well, cloud.

TheMercenary 06-01-2010 12:40 PM

Illegal immigration is a crime already. It matters not that a state also makes it a crime.

classicman 06-01-2010 12:49 PM

Dude - take it here

TheMercenary 06-01-2010 12:57 PM

why?

Cloud 06-01-2010 01:04 PM

(Cloud lafs at her powerlessness.ness)

classicman 06-01-2010 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud (Post 659429)
post about this (Immigration) in the neimroller thread, and leave this thread for discussion of drug wars on the border. Related issues, but not quite the same. I acknowledge my powerlessness on this point though.


Cloud 06-01-2010 01:22 PM

Immigration problems and issues have been hot topics long before the current drug violence in Cd. Juarez, which isn't very close to Arizona. Maybe we just need a new thread?

And of course I got jumped on for even making a comment about this. But thread drift is apparently just dandy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.