![]() |
Quote:
And it isn't disproportionate, it's just more proportionate than you're used to. |
Quote:
Quote:
Geez and I'm so relieved that "we aren't a BAD country" in your view - Whew I feel so much better. Thanks. |
Even a progressive tax system unequalizes a population if you really think about it. Let's use Joe Average as an example. He and his wife make a total of $47k annually, which would put them in the second tax bracket at 15%. To simplify lets just say their tax contribution is 47000*0.15=$7050 every year. His highschool buddy Harry Surgeon is making $600k, putting him in the highest bracket of 35%. Harry is sending off 600000*0.35=$210000 a year to Uncle Sam, that's about 30x more then Joe. Now enter Fred CEO, he's raking in a comfortable $2.7M off his firm, and is of course also in the highest bracket. That's (2.7*10^6)*0.35=$945000 in cash for our boys in Washington, almost a full 135x more then Joe. Without a stepped system those numbers would of course still be high, but only ~12.5x and 57.5x respectively. It exacerbates the problem of unequal government because certain classes of people are worth the equivalent of hundreds of their fellow citizens. While I'm certainly not claiming that doing away with tiered systems would solve this, it's still a big part of why certain interests are paid attention to immediately while others languish for years.
|
Where do the deductions fit into your model?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
queer...I've had this discussion on this forum a number of times before. In my personal opinion, the US doesn't have anything compared to Australia, but I'm pretty sure almost everyone feels that way about their place of birth.
I can say this though, I definitely don't want to move to the US. I doubt that I ever would. In my opinion, Australians in general have one of the most enviable lifestyles in the world. Why would i want to pass that up? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hahahaha, Aliantha you've got an extraneous 'r' there at the end of my name. I actually want to live in Australia for a while, maybe that's one of the next stops after the UK if I can convince the wifely one.
And yesman, the food reference implies that paupers (poor mexicans) choosing a slightly better lifestyle (illegal immigration) doesn't say that their minor step up is all that great, it's just better than their last situation. |
Thanks for making my point - If coming here was only marginally better than where they currently are, than it wouldn't be worth uprooting their family, taking only what they can carry, traveling a great distance, sneaking into another freakin country, breaking the law..... just to get into a little better situation? C'mon we are infinitely better than where they are coming from and you know it. Thats the reason they want to come here.
|
Correction, a legal citizen with an education is better off(though 'infinitely' might be pushing it)... an illegal citizen who has to choose between making less than minimum wage and putting himself at far greater health risks, who cannot hold a license or vote and is completely at the mercy of the community is only slighty better off.
Luckily most of us don't know what it's like to be at the bottom, but sometimes the difference between not eating regularly and eating mcdonalds is pretty important. That doesn't mean they have it great or even good. |
Sorry quee...i always think queer when i see your name even though I know there's no 'r' where i put it. ;)
I don't mean anything by it though. I'll try and leave the 'r' off from now on and just call you quee. :) |
:cool: If I had a nickel for every time someone's called me "Queerwhatever," I'd have a lot of nickels.
Queequeg's a character in a Herman Melville book, if you didn't know that. If you did I look like an ass now. :yelsick: |
you might look like an ass anyway, but not to me. ;)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.