![]() |
Quote:
Really, even after this supposed threat there is still little reason to fear getting on an airplane. You'll find more rationale to fear driving a car or riding a bicycle if you're really concerned about injury or death. In fact, you take more of a chance with your life by simply walking out the door each morning. If you take that risk, why not enjoy life and travel a bit? A fear of flying is never fun, but it is irrational and it can be treated, even on your own. I find it amazing, though, what a mere threat can do. Terrorists don't even need to actually attack people, anymore, to disrupt life, instill fear, and damage economies. They can do all of this, along with changing our political stance, values, and laws by merely making a threat or starting a rumor. We fear terrorists changing our world, but they don't need to. We do it just fine on our own at the mere mention of a potential attack. If they really wanted to take lives, they would have strolled into the unsecure, now extremely crowded areas of Heathrow wearing explosives wrapped in ballbearings and pushed a button. Why do that when the effect of panic and fear without death is just as bad? |
Quote:
I don't like to fly because it's a fucking hassle to get through security. I fly less now, especially along the East Coast. Sometimes it's almost as fast to drive, once you factor in the hassle time. Terrorists have not caused me to change my lifestyle much. We did avoid taking our kids to the playground when the DC sniper was picking random people off every couple of days. But I still presented myself as an exposed target as I walked to and from work each day. |
1 Attachment(s)
From CNN.com, this morning: "London police guard a house raided in the probe."
This is how London police guard the house of a suspected terrorist? No offense to the Brits, but I would have expected trooper-like guards in armor standing at the ready instead of someone dressed in a tap dancing cabbie outfit gnawing their nails in worry. |
It's hardly likely other terrorists are going to stop by when the occupants have already been taken into custody (and probably cordoned off outside the picture?) I would assume the WPC is simply there to check credentials of officials who need to enter.
Anyway, we need all our trooper-like armoured guards to make sure there's no pushing in at Heathrow - airport crowds can get pretty tetchy. |
Quote:
"None, and one press release" Quote:
|
That, and they want to make us all believe that air travel is vulnerable. Terror, remember?
My wife's boss just cancelled a flight to the East Coast today because of this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We learned our lesson the hard way with the accidental shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, and the recent bungled raids in Forest Gate. Doing things the 'American way' would just exacerbate an already delicate balancing act with ethnic minority communities who feel let down and persecuted by the police. It's interesting to note that Tony Blair continues to fanny about on a yacht in Barbados whilst his country remains on 'critical' state of alert. Hopefully his and Bush's days in office are numbered. |
Quote:
I've always wondered what these National Guard Troops are really there for besides the show factor. |
Quote:
|
|
Day four of chaos for UK airports
Quote:
Tell that to the US. More. |
Quote:
|
I don't know whether this is indicative of my own overpowering cynicism or the general mistrust with which our government and security forces are viewed generally these days....But the first thing that crossed my mind was "yeah right. I'll believe it when I see someone in court". We get that many people 'arrested' for supposed terrorist plots in this country only for them to be quietly released due to there being no actual evidence against them, or for them to end up being charged with video piracy, or growing pot.
I'm not the only one who felt instantly suspicious when this hit the news. I said to mum, have you heard about the terrorist threat? she just rolled her eyes. A work colleague shrugged and said "yeah, almost justifies our having to give up a 'little of our freedoms' huh?" (this was said in a voice dripping with sarcasm) All the news reports are very careful to refer to it as an 'alleged terrorist threat' or some other such caveats. Yeah man, they've been burned before. It could all turn out to be an actual threat and our security forces could have protected us from bloody slaughter. But I have my doubts and so do a lot of people in the UK. My guess is they got all this from *ahem* "a usually very reliable source". |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.