The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Philosophy (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   US Military Treatment Of Atheists (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=15503)

Happy Monkey 10-01-2007 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 391089)
No they don't.

So they aren't all the subject of the complaint.

If I complain that Republicans did something nefarious, or that Democrats are spineless, please in the future take it as given that I am not referring to the ones who did not do the thing I am complaining about; rather I am complaining that the ones who did not do it are too few. I'd rather not put that caveat in every post, but when it comes up, feel free to check that the standing caveat is still in effect.

SamIam 10-02-2007 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkzenrage (Post 391060)
I am married to one, my closest friend, many of my other friends are and many in my family are you fucking simpleton.
They all know how I feel and what I do to fight what "The Church" does and support me because they know that they hypocrisy harms the religion far more than anything else.

Punctuation would be a nice addition to your diatribes. It took me 30 seconds to decipher your first sentence, you simpleton.

Your argument sounds suspiciously like the old bromide, "some of my best friends are - (insert group of your choice - Afro-American, gays, homeless, lawyers, etc., etc.)."

I can't remember who said it - Jung, maybe? "Be careful whom you hate, for those are the ones you will most come to resemble."

xoxoxoBruce 10-02-2007 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 391098)
So they aren't all the subject of the complaint.

They are all the subject of his complaints, over and over and over and...
Quote:

If I complain that Republicans did something nefarious, or that Democrats are spineless, please in the future take it as given that I am not referring to the ones who did not do the thing I am complaining about; rather I am complaining that the ones who did not do it are too few. I'd rather not put that caveat in every post, but when it comes up, feel free to check that the standing caveat is still in effect.
If you want to make that caveat, either put it in the post or your signature. He's a homicide bomber, making no caveats.

Flint 10-02-2007 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 391093)
...Horseshit, you are trying to say all Christians are the same, because they are Christians... all Christians do the same things, think the same, act the same...

No, I'm not saying that. I've never said that, despite your repeated, hysterical claims to the contrary. Quote me, or fuck off. Your call.

Aliantha 10-02-2007 07:41 PM

Isn't the point that you can be part of the same group but still not be entirely the same?

xoxoxoBruce 10-02-2007 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 391011)
If you don't have any characteristics, then you aren't a group. If you do, then you are subject to criticism.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 391093)
Horseshit, you are trying to say all Christians are the same, because they are Christians... all Christians do the same things, think the same, act the same. That's patently ridiculous.
Are all Texans the same, think the same, act the same? I think not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 391375)
No, I'm not saying that. I've never said that, despite your repeated, hysterical claims to the contrary. Quote me, or fuck off. Your call.

That's exactly what you said, and it's bullshit.

dar512 10-02-2007 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 391011)
It's odd. A group of people choose to classify themselves as separate from the rest of humanity, but they also want immunity from criticism - because they claim that there are no defining characteristics to their classification.

If you don't have any characteristics, then you aren't a group. If you do, then you are subject to criticism.

Well, Flint, I have to say I got pretty much the same thing as Bruce did out of this.

I guess part of the problem is that I can't believe that anyone as intelligent as you seem to be could make this statement. Part of the problem is that there's so much hand-waving and generality throwing in these discussions. Let's walk through an example.

The set of all Christians are those that believe that Jesus is the son of God and that he died in atonement for our sins.

The people who believe in Creationism is a subset of the above set. So some Christians do not believe in Creationism.

So tell me why I should take flak over Creationism, when I don't believe it?

If that's not what you're saying, then maybe you could 'splain yourself better.

Aliantha 10-02-2007 08:08 PM

What I got from Flints post(s) is that people claim to be Christians which is fine, but that you can't disown part of the group just because you don't agree or believe what they do. They're still either part of the group or they're not, and if they are, then you by association must take some responsibility for the group as a whole.

For example, if you're an American, you might disagree with some things the American government does or something any other American does, but that doesn't make you any less American, and possibly, like most people who would consider themselves American, you'd want to fix the things that you think are wrong.

I could be wrong, but that's what I got out of it.

dar512 10-02-2007 08:27 PM

If that's what he's saying, then I most heartily disagree. No person can be responsible for another much less for an entire group. A person can only be responsible for their own actions.

Aliantha 10-02-2007 08:44 PM

I don't think it means you're responsible. I do think it means that you can't simply say, well I disagree with that but I'm not going to do anything about, and while I'm doing that, I'm going to stay part of the group anyway. It's not just about religion if you look at it from that perspective. You could look at any club and recognise that there are rules associated with the club and if you don't adhere to them, you get thrown out of the club. You don't get the luxury of saying, I'm part of that club, except when it comes to such and such. When that happens, I'm part of a different club.

xoxoxoBruce 10-02-2007 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dar512 (Post 391389)
I guess part of the problem is that I can't believe that anyone as intelligent as you seem to be could make this statement.

He's trolling, as usual.

xoxoxoBruce 10-02-2007 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha (Post 391415)
I don't think it means you're responsible. I do think it means that you can't simply say, well I disagree with that but I'm not going to do anything about, and while I'm doing that, I'm going to stay part of the group anyway. It's not just about religion if you look at it from that perspective.

That's a fucked up perspective. So you are responsible for the actions of every one of the 20,434,175 other Australians?
Quote:

You could look at any club and recognise that there are rules associated with the club and if you don't adhere to them, you get thrown out of the club. You don't get the luxury of saying, I'm part of that club, except when it comes to such and such. When that happens, I'm part of a different club.
It's not a club, it's something we have in common, and in many cases the only thing, those 2.1 billion people have in common.

Aliantha 10-02-2007 10:11 PM

Whatever you say Bruce. There's no point in trying to talk reasonably to you when you're on another one of your crusades.

Enjoy your day.

xoxoxoBruce 10-02-2007 10:18 PM

Fuck you, you condecending bitch.

Aliantha 10-02-2007 10:34 PM

lol...Careful you don't get too upset bruce. You might burst a blood vessel or something.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.