:eyebrow: there were

Someone skimmed a little to quickly, apparently.

Please forgive me for being thrilled that I'm not the only one that suffered emotional distress due to this post. :lol2:

Um, no...not if the flash, and the operative word is "flash" went off at a certain amount of movement from the badger. There are tons of photographs done this way. I dabble in photograpy myself. That is the same badger all over the yard...the moon could have been added later by the photographer for atmosphere with PHOTOSHOP.

But then you would expect strong shadows, and I don't see that.

The photo is taken from a high aspect which shortens the shadow. If you look closely, there are shadows under the bodies though. The photo's were taken using a flash in any case which is possibly not the only light source. This also could affect the length of the shadows.

If all the photo's were taken from the same aspect, why would the shadows be in different places?

Yeah besides badgers are digging psychos! If there were that many about that yard would probably look like a foundation dig for a 100 story building.

I dont see any shadows at all

Dare I do it again? Oh, why not.

"This is the city, Los Angeles, California. Sometimes, someone gets the urge to pet a small furry creature. That's when I go to work. My name's Friday. I carry a badger."

They could have lots of shots with one badger in each shot. Overlay them in photoshop, and bring each badger to the top. Only take the moon and other background stuff from one of the shots.

If the flash is very close to the camera lens, shadows would be hard to see at that distance.

Yeah Im still here Sundae Girl, lurking in the background, trying to wait for a news article in my neck of the woods to rock yours and every other cellars lil socks off.

And Shawnee that made me laugh so hard, can just imagine you with a badger under your arm

Are they badgering you?

:right:


but they are

here's a link to the real deal about this picture.