![]() |
Or we could get into semantics wars over what was supposed to be a joke, something that tickled me...eh. :)
I'm trying to see how you can be both, but if I was wrong I stand corrected. |
Quote:
|
eek I looked it up in wikipedia. There are a thousand types of atheism/agnosticism and levels and now my head spins. You were right, Ibby, I was wrong (no, the world is not ending.) :blush:
|
Wiki will be the end of true definitions.
|
Given the usual definitions of the supernatural, I'd say that both would be the default logical position.
Agnostic is default because the supernatural can always skip one step ahead of science. You can never state with certainty that something wasn't done supernaturally, but in such a way that it just looks natural. Atheist is default, because absence of belief is the most reasonable course in the absence of evidence. |
Re: Wiki...It's a quick reference, to me. Though it may not be all correct, I got the info I wanted without wading through theological websites; it was all on one page. Theism is all theory anyway. Before I catch it for that one, I am using the word theory in the usage that refers to "conjecture or speculation" NOT the usage of real science theory.
Disclaimers are fun! |
Quote:
|
What Happy Monkey said. ;)
|
I agree to some extent.
|
Define "extent." :lol2:
Classicman, just messing. I crack myself up, if no one else. ;) |
I think you crack up a lot of people - more than you know! Just not all in a good way :D
|
Yeah, that's the problem. I have discernation inefficiency.
|
Quote:
|
Wow. Someone just posted "You were right and I was wrong."
Wow. The world may not be ending but for me it just gave a quick backflip. |
Quote:
No reading comprehension? There are classes for that. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.