The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Pledge to America (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=23609)

Sundae 10-03-2010 11:20 AM

Royal Mail is the postal service run from the Post Office.
I have issues with the Royal Mail too, but at least they don't call themselves the People's Mail.

Lamplighter 10-03-2010 05:53 PM

Maybe it's like "corn sugar".
The only mail we get now is bills and junk mail.

So, since it is now the "people's postal service" you won't mind opening your mail as much.

Spexxvet 10-04-2010 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gvidas (Post 686174)
It's from A Taxpayer Receipt (page 3).

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 686187)

Thanks

TheMercenary 10-05-2010 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus (Post 686128)
So which of those would you eliminate?

Foreign Aid, IRS, DEA, Amtrack, cut salaries for Congress in half, they only work half a year anyway.

classicman 10-05-2010 08:45 AM

bah - Their salaries aren't the problem. Its the lifelong benefits.

Happy Monkey 10-05-2010 01:03 PM

Not for the ones who never retire. ;)

classicman 10-05-2010 01:10 PM

Yes - they are getting many of the the benefits while employed.


ETA - In the grand scheme of things ... Its not as big an issue as some other things.

TheMercenary 10-05-2010 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 686692)
Not for the ones who never retire. ;)

I don't think that is the drag on most large companies and states that pay.

Happy Monkey 10-05-2010 01:29 PM

At $0.19 per $5400, it's not a drag on the Federal government, either.

TheMercenary 10-05-2010 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 686703)
At $0.19 per $5400, it's not a drag on the Federal government, either.

Depends on how many millions you multiply that .19 by.

Happy Monkey 10-05-2010 01:45 PM

I suppose if you even multiplied it by one million, $190,000 per $5,400 would be quite a drag on the government's finances. I propose not multiplying congressional salaries and benefits by millions.

TheMercenary 10-05-2010 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 686710)
I suppose if you even multiplied it by one million, $190,000 per $5,400 would be quite a drag on the government's finances. I propose not multiplying congressional salaries and benefits by millions.

Agreed. I still say there may be some value in making the the jobs minimum wage with some really good benefits to keep them motivated. :rolleyes:

classicman 10-05-2010 01:53 PM

Can't do that - We need to attract the best and brightest. Just think of who we would have representing us if there was so little pay (Christine O'Donnell)

xoxoxoBruce 10-05-2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 686711)
Agreed. I still say there may be some value in making the the jobs minimum wage with some really good benefits to keep them motivated. :rolleyes:

They get ten times as much from the lobbyists anyway.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.