The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   The absurdity of Donald Trump (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=32145)

Griff 01-17-2018 07:03 AM

236

tw 01-26-2018 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1002398)
236

Number of days until impeachment?

Number of counts in the indictment?

sexobon 01-27-2018 02:22 AM

Trump's weight.

A little heavy for his height; but, that's due to his massive brain.

Griff 01-27-2018 07:21 AM

lol Trumps reported weight. The key thing is to lie about little things and big things alike.

Griff 01-27-2018 07:25 AM


Undertoad 01-27-2018 09:21 AM

Just seven more years.

xoxoxoBruce 01-27-2018 09:53 AM

Then Pence will make Trump a pleasant memory. :eek:

sexobon 01-27-2018 12:03 PM

When The Donald leaves office, Ivanka will become our first female President. She'll only be in her forties; so, she won't have lost her looks yet and she'll have the dirty old man vote locked in.

Then, comes the apocalypse: ... "Nations go to war over women like you. It's just a form of appreciation." ...


Griff 01-27-2018 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 1002949)
Just seven more years.

Every time there’s a Hillary sighting my gut verifies that.

Clodfobble 01-27-2018 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad
Just seven more years.

Regardless of whether he could win a second term--you think he'd sign up for it again? It seems obvious to me that he hates the job.

Happy Monkey 01-27-2018 01:57 PM

But which is stronger, his distaste for the job, or his inability to accept that he could have a successor?

Undertoad 01-27-2018 04:36 PM

He's already predicted his 2020 victory ~ which is, you know, exactly what he would do ~ so it holds no bearing. But still.

xoxoxoBruce 01-27-2018 05:39 PM

He was announcing to the acolytes he would make himself available.

sexobon 01-27-2018 05:47 PM

Trump has 2020 foresight; whereas, most people will have only 2020 hindsight.

He's so smart.

BigV 01-29-2018 05:35 PM

I know Trump doesn't type these up... But for fucking fuck's sake... Coulda been weird news, funny political pictures, but I find it absurd.

xoxoxoBruce 01-29-2018 06:33 PM

Non-union printer. :rolleyes:

BigV 01-30-2018 12:19 AM

Touche'

sexobon 01-30-2018 05:14 AM

Printer probably figured it was "Good enough for government work." Could happen to anyone.

Looked up "uniom" and found it's a word in Polish, the plural of unia (union).

Griff 01-30-2018 05:50 AM

Sending more work overseas?

sexobon 01-30-2018 04:01 PM

Not screening immigrant Polish printers carefully enough to prevent linguistic terrorism.

Ericinabox 01-30-2018 04:27 PM

Interesting
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 1002972)
He's already predicted his 2020 victory ~ which is, you know, exactly what he would do ~ so it holds no bearing. But still.

Well everyone who went against Trump is now pretty much busted as a rapist.

1. Russel Simmons.
2. Bill Cosby
3. Insert another liberal celebrity here . . .

Also try googling Hilary Clinton and Jordan Belfort (The real one). On who they made the 'Wolf Of Wall Street' movie on. I vote Trump if I could vote in American elections.

tw 01-30-2018 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ericinabox (Post 1003168)
Well everyone who went against Trump is now pretty much busted as a rapist.

Brainwashing is easily accomplished and still works.

BigV 01-30-2018 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ericinabox (Post 1003168)
Well everyone who went against Trump is now pretty much busted as a rapist.

I vote Trump if I could vote in American elections.

*This* is interesting.. Why?

Glinda 01-31-2018 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 1003119)
I know Trump doesn't type these up... But for fucking fuck's sake... Coulda been weird news, funny political pictures, but I find it absurd.

This is why the baby Jebus invented proofreaders.






* Said a freelance proofreader.

Pamela 02-01-2018 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sexobon (Post 1002984)
Trump has 2020 foresight; whereas, most people will have only 2020 hindsight.

With your permission, Ima steal this!

tw 02-01-2018 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pamela (Post 1003242)
With your permission, Ima steal this!

English words are free and in unlimited quantities. How can one steal what nobody owns?

Griff 02-02-2018 06:57 AM

most biggerly state of union evah!
or not...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ry/1086116001/

He did bump Fox news up which makes sense.


NPR has a little graphic that I'd interpret as people being sick of the bullshit that is the SotU. It looks like a slow steady drop from Clinton through Trumps first.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...story-it-didnt

glatt 02-02-2018 07:12 AM

The interesting thing to me is Bush Jr. Why did he start off low and then do better and better until he dropped again in 2004. Why was 2003 so high?

He was very unimpressive at the beginning of his term, so that makes sense that early 2001 was low. But then we had 9/11 and his subsequent war on terror, so I understand the bump up in 2002. But why so high in 2003? And then the massive drop off in 2004?

xoxoxoBruce 02-02-2018 09:47 AM

War... what is it good for... ratings.

Clodfobble 02-02-2018 01:40 PM

It's the "highest number in history" if he takes a move from Caesar's playbook and says the calendar starts over with him.

tw 02-02-2018 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 1003346)
The interesting thing to me is Bush Jr. Why did he start off low and then do better and better until he dropped again in 2004. Why was 2003 so high?

Other factors also apply. He did tax cuts. That means an immediate short term benefit that a majority blindly believed because rhetoric and half truths proved it. Followed many years later by a significant downturn.

That was predicted here (with reasons why) back then before those cuts were enacted. Cited were how all previous tax cuts that also resulted in a recession years later. Money games routinely create bad things many years later. A lesson we all should learn from today's tax cut for the rich. By 2004, the George Jr tax cuts were starting to contribute to a massive recession. Even the stock market was in constant downturn. People finally realized the myths were lies.

Meanwhile, in 2003, lies and rhetoric to promote war were peaking. Posted in the Cellar was:
Quote:

"And I'm very glad we've got the great team in office, men like Colin Powell, Don Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice.
We know all but Powell were intentionally lying to promote an unjustified war. They also constantly mocked and bad stabbed Powell who kept trying to restore sanity. As noted, "what is it good for ... ratings".

Starting in 2004, realities of a Mission Accomplished war first became obvious even to the many who drank the KoolAide.

By June 2004, Bremer had created an insurgency so massive that he could not even drive 5 miles from Baghdad to the airport (to evacuate Iraq). He also had to fly out secretly on a tiny jet. The insurgency intentionally created by Bremer, Rumsfeld, et al was that massive. Every informed American had realize we were about to sacrifice in Iraq (what turned out to be) most of the 5000 Americans for no purpose.

Every year after Mission Accomplished, reality demonstrated how much George Jr (actually Cheney) had lied blatantly and with total disregard for all American servicemen.

First an overwhelming majority of the informed saw it in 2004. Every year after that, more and more Americans realized how much and intentionally those George Jr people lied - for their own self serving reasons.

2004 is when secret torture and other Nazi like practices were finally coming to light. List of reasons why George Jr went downhill so much (and rightly so) are quite long. Above are but three.

sexobon 02-03-2018 08:21 AM

Yeah, no. Most people didn't care about any of that evidenced by the fact that he got reelected anyway. What sunk his popularity was his goofy daughters in the news. People were paying attention to that kind of stuff. Exhibit A:


Griff 02-03-2018 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 1003346)
The interesting thing to me is Bush Jr. Why did he start off low and then do better and better until he dropped again in 2004. Why was 2003 so high?

He was very unimpressive at the beginning of his term, so that makes sense that early 2001 was low. But then we had 9/11 and his subsequent war on terror, so I understand the bump up in 2002. But why so high in 2003? And then the massive drop off in 2004?

It was likely the whole hanging chad SC situation.

BigV 03-16-2018 09:28 PM

Posting from phone..


Just noticed that Andrew McCabe has been fired.

He's with the FBI, and he's publicly announced his retirement effective Saturday. Tomorrow.

Why fire him today?

To fuck up his pension.

This is not really *absurd*but it is 100 percent shitbag.

Thanks Trump.

tw 03-16-2018 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 1005841)
Thanks Trump.

How many who voted for Trump are finally apologizing?

sexobon 03-16-2018 10:14 PM

About the same as the number of Clinton supporters whose attitudes got her defeated that learned their lesson.

Dude111 03-16-2018 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw
How many who voted for Trump are finally apologizing?

They are so brainwashed they cant see it...


I HEARD A SHEEPLE ON A PHONE THE OTHER DAY YELL OUT "DONALD TRUMP IS A GREAT PRESIDENT" -- Oh my,I wanted to vomit!!!!!!!!!!

Glinda 03-17-2018 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 1005841)
Posting from phone..


Just noticed that Andrew McCabe has been fired.

He's with the FBI, and he's publicly announced his retirement effective Saturday. Tomorrow.

Why fire him today?

To fuck up his pension.

This is not really *absurd*but it is 100 percent shitbag.

Thanks Trump.

Interesting. Yet another Trump administration top advisor/agency head/long-time government employee that he's fired without actually looking them in the eye and saying "You're fired."

Very admirable. Pure class. Incredible bravery and courage in a difficult situation.

Everyone says so.

Griff 03-17-2018 08:51 AM

Time will tell, but I'm not sure you want to go out on a limb for this guy.

Glinda 03-17-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1005855)
Time will tell, but I'm not sure you want to go out on a limb for this guy.

:p:

sexobon 03-17-2018 02:32 PM

President Trump is just an analogue man in a digital bureaucracy.

Happy Monkey 03-17-2018 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1005855)
Time will tell, but I'm not sure you want to go out on a limb for this guy.

Saying that it's a dick move to fire someone the day before they retire is hardly going out on a limb.

sexobon 03-17-2018 03:04 PM

If the guy who was fired was being a dick and thought he could escape consequences by going into retirement, the golden rule is in effect.

Griff 03-18-2018 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 1005876)
Saying that it's a dick move to fire someone the day before they retire is hardly going out on a limb.

Firing someone for a fire-able offense on the recommendation of the Inspector General is not necessarily a dick move (granted Sessions is by and large a dick). When the IG's report is released, we'll have a better idea. Even assholes do the right thing now and again.

link to NYT stating recommendation by IG https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/u...epartment.html

Griff 03-18-2018 09:40 AM

As an independent voter, I want Trump out as badly as anyone because he is obviously corrupt and a threat to the Republic. This does not excuse Democrats when they do things that undermine the integrity of the various departments. I recognize that some in the GOP are actively trying to undermine public confidence in the Justice Department. My confidence is bolstered when an internal review recommends that neither party be protected from the truth. We can come out the other side of all this with integrity intact.

BigV 03-19-2018 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1005913)
As an independent voter, I want Trump out as badly as anyone because he is obviously corrupt and a threat to the Republic. This does not excuse Democrats when they do things that undermine the integrity of the various departments. I recognize that some in the GOP are actively trying to undermine public confidence in the Justice Department. My confidence is bolstered when an internal review recommends that neither party be protected from the truth. We can come out the other side of all this with integrity intact.

I agree with this whole statement.

It's *still* a dick move. It is completely in character for Trump.

Most of all, I feel the show of it is far more important to Trump, and I think he's probably right in that regard. Why now I ask. If the report's been circulating for a while, why now? I've also read that the report hasn't even been completed yet, if so, why fire him now?

I'm looking forward to reading the report when it becomes available. The dribs and drabs I've read make things sound like there's a much different standard being applied, depending on how much Trump likes or dislikes you.

THAT'S the skeeviest part. I don't want either party to be protected from the truth ;neither do I want our government enacted by only the very best toadies.

No offense UT..

Griff 03-21-2018 06:30 AM

Peters bails on Fox/Trump propaganda machine.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fo...ine-2018-03-20

tw 03-21-2018 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 1005942)
The dribs and drabs I've read make things sound like there's a much different standard being applied, depending on how much Trump likes or dislikes you.

Dribs and drabs imply propaganda - only leaking what they want to admit.

It is an old Donald trick. Leak out misinformation and lies. By the time those lies are exposed, he has moved on through two or three other lies. So nobody notices he lied again.

xoxoxoBruce 03-21-2018 02:22 PM

Or assumes he lied again unless you belong to his base.

BigV 03-22-2018 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 1006029)
Dribs and drabs imply propaganda - only leaking what they want to admit.

It is an old Donald trick. Leak out misinformation and lies. By the time those lies are exposed, he has moved on through two or three other lies. So nobody notices he lied again.

Correct.

#likeabrokenclock

Happy Monkey 03-22-2018 12:43 PM

The term is "Gish gallop".

tw 03-22-2018 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 1006081)
"Gish gallop".

Excellent contribution.

Griff 03-23-2018 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 1006039)
Or assumes he lied again unless you belong to his base.

Still cruising along at what 43%? He is virtually untouchable. His base thinks it's a coup attempt. Good thing this country is full of AR-15s.

tw 03-23-2018 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1006113)
Still cruising along at what 43%? He is virtually untouchable. His base thinks it's a coup attempt. Good thing this country is full of AR-15s.

Hey Hey Mr Toupee. Who is it you fired today?

Well most of the 'war should never be a first and only option' advisers are now gone. McMaster was famous as a Captain in Desert Storm for leading nine tanks in the destruction of all 28 Iraqi tanks. Ted Koppel (Nightline) defined this first tank engagement in the Battle of 73 Eastings.

McMasters also wrote a doctoral thesis and later a scathing book detailing top management in the Vietnam war that was more than 85% responsible for that disaster.

This is the kind of officer that creates victories because, in part, he is not bombastic. Since negotiations always result in greater victories. Being intellectual, then Trump (who never even reads books) would eventually hate him.

43%? Are that many Americans so obviously anti-American?

Trump will replace McMaster with one who openly advocates war as the first and only solution. Who openly endorses torture. Whose entire life is never about consensus (which is the job of a National Security Adviser). Who, like Trump, knows without first learning facts.

Replacing Tillerson and McMaster with right wing wacko extremists who even openly endorse Nazi style torture makes war a likely certainty. Since both advocate attacking others without provocation. Both have openly endorsed unilateral attacks on North Korea using the same pompous rhetoric that they approved of and promoted in Mission Accomplished.

Griff 03-23-2018 01:32 PM

Honestly, I'm way more concerned about Iran than NK.

tw 03-23-2018 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1006137)
Honestly, I'm way more concerned about Iran than NK.

The Iran problem is solved if Trump and the extremists do not screw it up.

The North Korean problem was solved long ago by Jimmy Carter - until American extremists screwed it up. And then George Jr used diplomacy (his axis of evil speech) to subvert that entire solution.

An Iran situation was also being solved. Iran was actually working as an American friend to attack and conquer the Taliban. That solution was also destroyed by the "Axis of Evil" speech - given by a most evil one.

From PBS Fronline:
Quote:

In November, Secretary of State Colin Powell shook hands with the Iranian foreign minister, Kamal Kharrazi, at the U.N. headquarters in New York City -- a simple yet historic gesture that seemed the most tantalizing hint of rapprochement between the U.S. and Iran since the Islamic revolution and the hostage crisis in 1979.

But on Jan. 29, 2002, in his State of the Union address, President George W. Bush branded Iran and its "terrorist allies" as part of "an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world." And on Jan. 31, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice summed up the administration's position on Iran. "Iran's direct support of regional and global terrorism," she said, "and its aggressive efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction, belie any good intentions it displayed in the days after the world's worst terrorist attacks in history."
How dumb were we (because of George Jr and people who elected him)? The Iranian situation was solved multiple times. Then wackos screwed it up. Bolton (a lover of Nazi style torture) was one who openly wanted us to invade Iran and North Korea. Which is why Trump likes him. And apparently will screw everything up but again. When will he give his axis of evil speech?

Always learn from history. Extremists even in the Cellar will deny all this because it contradicts what their propaganda sources have ordered them to believe. And because they use emotions rather than facts from history to know otherwise.

Dexter Filkins details what has long been known in the New Yorker on 30 Sept 2013. Yes, this reality has been known for that long.
Quote:

In the chaotic days after the attacks of September 11th, Ryan Crocker ... flew discreetly to Geneva to meet a group of Iranian diplomats. “I’d fly out on a Friday and then back on Sunday, so nobody in the office knew where I’d been,” Crocker told me. “We’d stay up all night in those meetings.” It seemed clear to Crocker that the Iranians were answering to Suleimani, whom they referred to as “Haji Qassem,” and that they were eager to help the United States destroy their mutual enemy, the Taliban. Although the United States and Iran broke off diplomatic relations in 1980, after American diplomats in Tehran were taken hostage, Crocker wasn’t surprised to find that Suleimani was flexible. “You don’t live through eight years of brutal war without being pretty pragmatic,” he said. Sometimes Suleimani passed messages to Crocker, but he avoided putting anything in writing. “Haji Qassem’s way too smart for that,” Crocker said. “He’s not going to leave paper trails for the Americans.”

Before the bombing began, Crocker sensed that the Iranians were growing impatient with the Bush Administration, thinking that it was taking too long to attack the Taliban. At a meeting in early October, 2001, the lead Iranian negotiator stood up and slammed a sheaf of papers on the table. “If you guys don’t stop building these fairy-tale governments in the sky, and actually start doing some shooting on the ground, none of this is ever going to happen!” he shouted. “When you’re ready to talk about serious fighting, you know where to find me.” He stomped out of the room. “It was a great moment,” Crocker said.

The cooperation between the two countries lasted through the initial phase of the war. At one point, the lead negotiator handed Crocker a map detailing the disposition of Taliban forces. “Here’s our advice: hit them here first, and then hit them over here. And here’s the logic.” Stunned, Crocker asked, “Can I take notes?” The negotiator replied, “You can keep the map.” The flow of information went both ways. On one occasion, Crocker said, he gave his counterparts the location of an Al Qaeda facilitator living in the eastern city of Mashhad. The Iranians detained him and brought him to Afghanistan’s new leaders, who, Crocker believes, turned him over to the U.S. The negotiator told Crocker, “Haji Qassem is very pleased with our coöperation.”

The good will didn’t last. In January, 2002, Crocker, who was by then the deputy chief of the American Embassy in Kabul, was awakened one night by aides, who told him that President George W. Bush, in his State of the Union Address, had named Iran as part of an “Axis of Evil.” Like many senior diplomats, Crocker was caught off guard. He saw the negotiator the next day at the U.N. compound in Kabul, and he was furious. “You completely damaged me,” Crocker recalled him saying. “Suleimani is in a tearing rage. He feels compromised.” The negotiator told Crocker that, at great political risk, Suleimani had been contemplating a complete reëvaluation of the United States, saying, “Maybe it’s time to rethink our relationship with the Americans.” The Axis of Evil speech brought the meetings to an end. Reformers inside the government, who had advocated a rapprochement with the United States, were put on the defensive. Recalling that time, Crocker shook his head. “We were just that close,” he said. “One word in one speech changed history.”
Could the George Jr wackos have done any more to screw it up? Notice how The Donald is replacing educated people with many of the same wackos. In part, because Fox News tells him what to think. (The Donald does not read books.) How many educated people were fired or quit just this week?

Every responsible person in the Cellar should know this internationally known story. Suleimani remains a legendary leader of the Quds and is probably now a if not the most powerful person in the Middle East. He could have very easily become an America friend if not for a wacko extremist (dumb, uneducated) George Jr administration.

(How many forget that Ho Chi Minh five times ask for Vietnam to become a protectorate of the US. Same wackos wasted 50,000 American lives uselessly there. How many Nam Vets are appropriately angry about that. Learn from history.)

Same wackos destroyed an entire North Korea solution that was made at great risk and courage by North Korea's Fatty Two (Kim).

Wars are averted by international diplomacy followed by trade. A president so dumb is doing everything to destroy both all over the world to make America a first, a second class power. He wants war. He is so dumb (educated only by a propaganda machine called Fox News) that he does not even realize he only wants war.

The North Korean problem had been solved until wacko extremists destroyed it. The Iranian problem was solved twice. And again, wackos are doing everything they can to destroy it.

Meanwhile Putin is successfully playing chess with Trump at the expense of America. Where did North Korea get all those rockets and nuclear technology? Where is the Taliban suddenly getting so many weapons?

Which theater is a greater danger? Easily debated. But both dangers exist only because so many Americans vote for people who don't even read books, have low intelligence, ignore history, and are driven only by their political extremist agenda inspired by a big dic mentality. IOW they are not moderates so they are anti-Americans. We are expected to suffer even in our schools, infrastructure, influence, an already decreasing number of friends, economic power, military power, and, well we are raising generations of militaristic inspired youth who have no idea what once made America great. A military and wars did not do that. Diplomacy and free trade do.

Which is a greatest threat? Iran? North Korea? Actually it is Trump and the people who tell him what to think (Limbaugh, Alex Jones, Bolton, Fox News, and the wackos who voted for him).

tw 03-29-2018 07:52 PM

Because he is so dumb, so anti-American, and so egotistical - from the NY Times of 29 Mar 2018 -
Quote:

The Trump administration is expected to launch an effort in coming days to weaken greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy standards for automobiles,
Anyone with basic technical knowledge knows innovation (not enriching the central committee - top management) made America great. But Trump only campaigns to people so dumb as to even want carburetors, leaded gas, $120 tune ups every three months or 5000 miles, massive NO2 clouds, annual wheel alignment, and lower gasoline mileage.

We know why technologies required by EPA standard made innovators relevant and wealthier. EPA requirements massively increased auto reliability that even required fuel injection, no more lead, and electronics ignitions (meaning all cars after 1970s needed no tuneups).

Trump hates innovation and other factors that make America great. So now wants to stop all innovation in automobiles. Because he is preaching to people (supporters) so dumb as to be told (and believe) that is good.

Even a 70 Hp per liter engine, stifled in America by people so much like The Donald, is necessary in all cars. Innovation and EPA standards even forced crap automakers such as GM and Chrysler to innovate. Trump wants to fuck that over. Profanity only resevred for those as evil and dumb as a leader of 1940 Germany. Another wacko extremist.

Urbane Guerrilla 04-08-2018 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 1001467)
As much as you and I enjoyed No Drama Obama despite his failings some folks prefer bluster constant fucking bullshit. They wanted a disgusting individual and we all get him.

Griff, dear fellow: are you really going to state you'd want the Unindicted Felon over somebody who has done more to keep the Bill of Rights than the last three Democrats at the helm combined?

Fortunately, I'm smart enough to appreciate the mouthy blowhard for the libertarian things he's managed to do, and which the Unindicted Felon would never do, because the statist Democratic Party would be inconvenienced. As a Libertarian, I say if you inconvenience, even infuriate, just one statist every day, you're doing the Republic a lot of good.

Urbane Guerrilla 04-08-2018 09:39 PM

Right. Out of date sig. Edited.

Urbane Guerrilla 04-08-2018 10:11 PM

Absurdities of... Hmm
 
So... 70hp per liter displacement. Brief google on such terms. Oh, lookee... on this list -- a Dodge, two Cadillacs, and a Chrysler, all in the top ten of a list of cars doing 70hp/liter or better. These models do not seem remotely remarkable -- and this list dates from 2004. Where have you been these fourteen years since, tw? Apparently your neurotic mentality prevents growth, or -- anything, really. I am glad that I disagree with you.

Quote:

1. Honda S2000: 240hp/2.2L = 109hp/L
2. Mercedes-Benz CL65: 604hp/6.0L = 101hp/L
3. Dodge SRT-4: 230hp/2.4L = 96hp/L
4. Honda Accord: 240hp/3.0L = 80hp/L
5. Nissan Maxima: 265hp/3.5L = 76hp/L
6. Nissan Altima: 250hp/3.5L = 71hp/L
7. Cadillac CTS: 255hp/3.6L = 71hp/L
8. Cadillac CTS-V: 400hp/5.7L = 70hp/L
9. Toyota Camry: 210hp/3.0L = 70hp/L
10. Chrysler 300C SRT-8: 425hp/6.1L = 70hp/L
11. Kia Spectra: 138hp/2.0L = 69hp/L
12. Pontiac Grand Prix: 260hp/3.8L = 68hp/L
13. Ford Taurus: 201hp/3.0L = 67hp/L
14. Chevrolet Corvette: 400hp/6.0L = 67hp/L
15. Chevrolet Aveo: 103hp/1.6L = 64hp/L
16. Chevrolet Impala SS: 240hp/3.8L = 63hp/L
17. Dodge Viper: 500hp/8.3L = 60hp/L
18. Pontiac Bonneville: 275hp/4.6L = 60hp/L
19. Chrysler 300C: 340hp/5.7L = 60hp/L
20. Chevrolet Malibu: 200hp/3.5L = 57hp/L
21. Ford Crown Victoria: 239hp/4.6L = 52hp/L
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...mparison-6726/

And some other none-too-special-grade factory models coming only a little short of the 70hp threshhold, which may be quite arbitrary, the better to utter micro-bitchery about. As of, I repeat, fourteen years ago. Where is any reason to suppose there has been falling back from 70hp/L? There is no reason to assert there is or was an active effort to hold power per displacement down on the part of Big Government (my fave swearword, isn't it?), Big Labor, Big Auto -- or Big Anybody, really. Technological advance ignores both conspiracies and conspiracist thinking.

My own vehicle is an example: a 2008 VW with the 2.5L normally aspirated engine, 177hp: 78.8hp/L. Heh, not bad. My mechanic thinks it's a terrific engine too.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.