The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Deadly Swine Flu Outbreak (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=20147)

Griff 07-28-2009 05:26 AM

Glad to hear he's doing well.

jinx 08-04-2009 06:55 PM

Hey merc, can you confirm/deny that the swine flu vaccine is using squalene as an adjuvant? Thanks in advance...

Quote:

A study linking squalene, as experimental vaccine adjuvant, to individuals with the clinical signs of Gulf War syndrome was published in 2002. The published findings strongly suggest that the squalene contaminated vaccines could be responsible for the Gulf War Syndrome symptoms seen in the study group, and recommended that a large scale epidemiological study be performed to verify or correct this.[4] Despite repeated assurances that the vaccine was safe and necessary, a U.S. Federal Judge ruled that there was good cause to believe it was harmful, and he ordered the Pentagon to stop administering it in October 2004.[5]

TheMercenary 08-04-2009 07:45 PM

You can do your own research:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Sounds like a sensationalized blame game to me.

TheMercenary 08-04-2009 07:49 PM

Since I got 6 of the shots before they were given to the troops at large I would call bull shit on it. But hey, I am just one person.

I never got GWS.

But wait. I never went to the First Gulf War. So is it only the people who got the shots and then were deployed? or did you have to get the shots only if you were deployed? and so if people who got the vaccine and did not deploy never got the disease, how would you account for that?

jinx 08-04-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

You can do your own research
Yes, I can. I thought maybe you'd know though. Not interested in opinion...

Aliantha 08-04-2009 07:50 PM

TIWGTGWS? (thought I was going to gulf war syndrome)

TheMercenary 08-04-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 586047)
Yes, I can. I thought maybe you'd know though. Not interested in opinion...

All I can tell you is that every person who got it, in my experience, about 20 people or so, were deployed. We all got the same vaccines. About 40 who never deployed to the Gulf. None of us who did not deploy got the disease. Among the other, they got it in some degree, some much worse than others. Some were medically boarded from the Army because of it, others carried on. All of them were exposed to the areas that had either chemical weapons burning or the burning oil fields. That is the extent of my experience.

No conclusive studies have shown that people who got the vaccine got GWS who did not also deploy, which blows the theory out of the water that it was only vaccine related.

I am not willing to jump on “your band wagon”.

jinx 08-04-2009 08:05 PM

I don't think you understood my question...

Quote:

Hey merc, can you confirm/deny that the swine flu vaccine is using squalene as an adjuvant? Thanks in advance...

skysidhe 08-05-2009 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 581547)
Seems like the more effective/less abused antibiotic route would make more sense than iffy vaccines then. Swine flu vax didn't work out too well last time, what with it killing more people than the flu and all...

Good info. ( re: the link )

I do worry about vaccine.

They say people that have asthma or other lung conditions should get the shot. However I seem to have a better physical constitution for eliminating these things out of my body naturally. ( 99.9% of the time )

A couple years ago my bronchitis would not go away. I think I coughed for a year. My doctor would not give me antibiotics because I didn't have a fever. ( I never run fevers )

When I went to the pulmonologist he thought I had something serious because I could barely move the spirograph but the image tests were clear. He gave me antibiotics and an inhailer and I was healed after awhile.


Usually things don't hang on to me like that. I don't know where the asthma thing came from or why it developed after getting bronchitis twice.
I don't use the inhailer now.

SO they say people with lung problems SHOULD get the vaccine. I keep wondering if a past lung problem means me. The biggest part of me tells me NOT to get the shot. If I didn't die then I probably won't die this time.

I keep running this stuff through my head.
sorry for all that...it just spilled out

Aliantha 08-05-2009 05:30 PM

I haven't ever had a flu shot, and I don't intend to get one for swine flu either. I am of the belief that you're probably better off without it, but it's a personal health choice. If others want to do it, it's up to them.

jinx 08-05-2009 07:47 PM

New-age Vaccine Adjuvants: Friend or Foe?

Quote:

A major unsolved challenge in adjuvant development is how to achieve a potent adjuvant effect while avoiding reactogenicity or toxicity.3 Most newer human adjuvants including MF59 (this is the one in the swine flu vaccine, just fyi),4 ISCOMS,5 QS21,6 AS02,7 and AS048 have substantially higher local reactogenicity and systemic toxicity than alum. Even alum, despite being FDA-approved, has significant adverse effects including injection site pain, inflammation, and lymphadenopathy, and less commonly injection-site necrosis, granulomas, or sterile abscess.9
...

Because of frequent adverse reactions, the major human use of oil-in-water emulsions has been in therapeutic cancer and HIV vaccines29 although Adjuvant 65 was previously used in a prophylactic influenza vaccine.

Although potent, such adjuvants induced severe local reactions in some recipients.33


Originally, Syntex adjuvant (containing squalene oil, a non-ionic surfactant, poloxamer L121, and threonyl muramyl dipeptide) was developed as a replacement for CFA.39 However, this adjuvant proved too toxic for human use40 and Chiron subsequently developed MF59 adjuvant as an alternative.


Because of excessive reactogenicity and/or toxicity, the current version of MF59 used in an adjuvanted influenza vaccine (FLUAD) registered in Italy does not contain MTP but instead just squalene oil and surfactants.43,44 Published data suggests addition of MF59 only induces a modest (about 25%) increase in antibody levels in the elderly and no difference in younger individuals when compared to unadjuvanted influenza vaccine.4,45 Furthermore, there was little evidence that MF59 is antigen-sparing for influenza vaccines, since the same antigen dose is required for MF59 as for the unadjuvanted vaccine.4,45


Limitations of MF59. On the negative side, MF59, like all other oil-in-water adjuvants, is associated with major increases in injection site pain and reactogenicity.4 Another concern with squalene oil is its ability to induce chronic inflammatory arthritis in susceptible animal models.48 Susceptibility to squalene arthritis is genetically determined, raising the risk that adjuvants based on squalene oil may also induce or exacerbate inflammatory arthritis in genetically susceptible humans.48


skysidhe 08-06-2009 07:08 AM

More about Squalene oil.

Squalene oil is used in vaccines
According to Matsumoto, today, “Squalene adjuvants are a key ingredient in a whole new generation of vaccines intended for mass immunization around the globe. Squalene is not just a molecule found in a knee or elbow - it is found throughout the nervous system and the brain.” When injected in the body, the immune system attacks it as an enemy to be eliminated. Eating and digesting squalene isn’t a problem. But injecting it “galvanize(s) the immune system into attacking it, which can produce self-destructive cross reactions against the same molecule in the places where it occurs naturally in the body - and where it is critical to the health of the nervous system.” Once self-destruction begins, it doesn’t stop as the body keeps making the molecule that the immune system is trained to attack and destroy,
It is a dangerous additive and should be banned

ZenGum 08-19-2009 06:56 AM

Here are some up to date statistics, but they are all about South Australia.

We have had 6842 confirmed cases of H1N1 2009 influenza A (sounds much more scientific when I say it that way, doesn't it?) AKA swine flu.

There have been 12 people who have died with the disease. However, at least nine of involved "significant" other health problems - bone cancer, emphysema, etc.

6842 / 12 = 570.

That is a one in 570 chance of dying from swine flu, if you get it. That's 0.175%. That is less than the usual 0.2% for regular seasonal flu.

Of course, if you are fit and healthy, it might be more accurate to say 6842 / 3 (three otherwise healthy people died) = 2280.

One in 2,280 chance for a healthy person to die from swine flu if they get it. That is 0.04% chance.

Presumably, there have been quite a few people who had swine flu but were never tested. So if that 6,842 is actually, I dunno, 10,000 ... fuckit.

I will still be washing my hands before eating, and if I get sick I will visit the doctor, but I'd do that anyway.

As you were.

classicman 08-19-2009 11:34 AM

Sounds like just more media hype - scare tactics too.
Who "profits" from this? Thats what I want to know.

Clodfobble 08-19-2009 12:52 PM

The pharmaceutical companies that produce the vaccine.

xoxoxoBruce 08-20-2009 12:50 AM

And the people that get paid to distribute them.

jinx 09-03-2009 11:19 AM

Eh? What's this mean?
WHO
Quote:

Also in Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called “mock-up” vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus. Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.

xoxoxoBruce 09-03-2009 11:27 AM

Sounds like they are filling their, Just In Case arsenal. :confused:

Clodfobble 09-03-2009 11:47 AM

Sure, gotta get ready for horse flu, and gecko flu, and capybara flu...

monster 09-03-2009 12:41 PM

....shark flu

or is it.....

Cicero 09-03-2009 04:38 PM

I was listening to a radio show today....The host was saying that through "herding instinct" the herd will get vaccinated and leave everyone else to die. A new social class will develop that has been vaccinated vs the ones who have not.

I thought that was utter bullshit.

classicman 09-03-2009 10:12 PM

I saw that movie too, Cic! I think it sucked IIRC.

ZenGum 09-04-2009 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cicero (Post 592446)
I was listening to a radio show today....The host was saying that through "herding instinct" the herd will get vaccinated and leave everyone else to die. A new social class will develop that has been vaccinated vs the ones who have not.

I thought that was utter bullshit.

Well, as reported here, it is BS. Notice: " ... leave everyone else to die" ... new social classes ... have Vs Have Not vaccinated...

The premise was that all nonvaccinated die, wasn't it?

But apart from that, there is some thought that we should not allow unvaccinated kids into schools because of the risk they pose to the too-young-to-vaccinate siblings of their classmates. That *could* lead to social segregation.

Shawnee123 09-04-2009 07:20 AM

So when the world mimics The Stand, which side will you be on? I want to be on the side that Gary Sinise is on, 'cause he was hawt in that movie!

capnhowdy 09-04-2009 07:20 AM

192 hospitalizations and 5 deaths in Georgia.

piercehawkeye45 09-04-2009 08:24 AM

120 people got it at the Minnesota state fair yesterday....

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/251761/

glatt 09-04-2009 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 (Post 592587)
120 people got it at the Minnesota state fair yesterday....

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/251761/

Article says 120 were sent home because they were in the same dorm as a handful who got it. It does not say 120 people got the flu.

Clodfobble 09-04-2009 09:34 AM

My son's doctor warned me that another of his patients, who lives in Killeen, Texas, told him they were starting a swine flu vaccination program in the school building next week. Not without parental notification/permission (which is how she knew it was happening) but nonetheless, they're starting to inject some kids already. Make sure you know what your school's plan is.

xoxoxoBruce 09-04-2009 10:38 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Symptoms.

skysidhe 09-04-2009 10:58 AM

I have been thinking to get the Pneumovax vaccine even before the swine flu scare began. I ran across this article this morning. Even though I am not into the flu vaccines I am highly considering this one. It lasts for 10 years and since the deaths from the swine flu are pneumonia related I thought is might be a good alternative.

http://www.latimes.com/features/heal...,6872284.story


http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller/miller27.html

Avoid Flu Shots, Take Vitamin D Instead

by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD

Two-thirds of the vaccines made for the 2008–09 flu season, 100 million of them, contain full-dose thimerosal, an organomercury compound, which is 49% mercury by weight.:eek: (well I knew there was mercury in them but I didn't realize how much!)

There is some evidence that flu shots cause Alzheimer’s disease. This most likely is a result of combining mercury with aluminum and formaldehyde, which renders them much more toxic together through a synergistic effect than each would be alone. One investigator has reported that people who received the flu vaccine each year for 3 to 5 years had a ten-fold greater chance of developing Alzheimer’s disease than people who did not have any flu shots :eek:

misplaced post
I think I should have posted this here instead.
http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=20308

Cicero 09-06-2009 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 592572)
So when the world mimics The Stand, which side will you be on? I want to be on the side that Gary Sinise is on, 'cause he was hawt in that movie!


Yes!! I have loved him ever since....I often wonder why he never made it as big as some of the other guys...

glatt 09-07-2009 07:24 PM

The Washington Post today endorsed the swine flu vaccine. For whatever that's worth.

Clodfobble 09-07-2009 09:16 PM

Is there a second page I'm not seeing? I don't see an endorsement to take the vaccine, but it also seems to end rather abruptly so I figure I must be missing something.

xoxoxoBruce 09-07-2009 09:48 PM

According to the news tonight, the hundreds of college kids that have gotten it (H1N1 not vaccine), have gotten over it in 2 or 3 days. Much faster than normal flu, and without intestinal distress either.

glatt 09-08-2009 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 593265)
Is there a second page I'm not seeing? I don't see an endorsement to take the vaccine, but it also seems to end rather abruptly so I figure I must be missing something.

That's a good question. I read the paper edition yesterday, and it came across as an endorsement to me. So I looked for an electronic version I could link to here. Now I'm at work and re-reading the electronic version, I don't see an outright endorsement either. Either I read it wrong, or there was a headline or something in the paper edition that made me think they were endorsing it.

If I misread it, and I probably did, it was probably the quoted expert saying "The benefit of the vaccine far outweighs the risks." that came across to me as the paper's endorsement.

jinx 09-08-2009 10:07 AM

Flu drugs inappropriate for healthy adults
Quote:

The flu drugs Tamiflu and Relenza may not be worthwhile to treat seasonal influenza in healthy adults, British researchers reported on Friday. "Recommending the use of antiviral drugs for the treatment of people presenting with symptoms is unlikely to be the most appropriate course of action," wrote Jane Burch of the University of York and colleagues.


The drugs worked a little better in people who have a high risk of complications, such as patients with diabetes or asthma, with Relenza cutting sickness by almost a day and Tamiflu by three-quarters of a day, on average.

TheMercenary 09-19-2009 10:07 PM

I am not sure what to make of this report, if it is true. Usually these things are leaked for a purpose. So I am trying to figure out what that purpose is and who would benefit from the leak.

Swine flu 'could kill millions unless rich nations give £900m'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...osts-un-report

spudcon 09-19-2009 10:53 PM

Shhhh. I think I just heard a piece of the sky falling.

TheMercenary 09-20-2009 05:16 AM

Eh. I don't think I could go that far. It was more of an interest to me that there was some sort of moral blackmail going on.

piercehawkeye45 09-23-2009 12:58 PM

That article isn't even discrete. But, the death rate is much higher in South American countries.

http://www.flucount.org/

classicman 10-07-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Do NOT Let Your Child Get Flu Vaccine -- 9 Reasons Why

Posted by: Dr. Mercola October 06 2009


This year it is more important that you protect your children and loved ones from the flu vaccines than influenza itself. This article on Lew Rockwell discusses how:

1. The swine flu is simply another flu. It is not unusually deadly.

2. This is the first time both seasonal and pandemic flu vaccines will be administered. Both seasonal flu and swine flu vaccines will require two inoculations. This is because single inoculations have failed to produce sufficient antibodies. This is an admission that prior flu vaccines were virtually useless. Can you trust them this time?

3. Adjuvants are added to vaccines to boost production of antibodies but may trigger autoimmune reactions. Some adjuvants are mercury (thimerosal), aluminum and squalene. Why would you sign a consent form for your children to be injected with mercury, which is even more brain-toxic than lead?

4. This is the first year mock vaccines have been used to gain FDA approval. The vaccines that have been tested are not the same vaccines your children will be given.

5. Over-vaccination is a common practice now in America. American children are subjected to 29 vaccines by the age of two. Meanwhile, veterinarians have backed off of repeat vaccination in dogs because of observed side effects.
6. Modern medicine has no explanation for autism, despite its continued rise in prevalence. Yet autism is not reported among Amish children who go unvaccinated.

7. Researchers are warning that over-use of the flu vaccine and anti-flu drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza can apply genetic pressure on flu viruses and then they are more likely to mutate into a more deadly strain.
8. Most seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus strains tested from the United States and other countries are now resistant to Tamiflu (oseltamivir). Tamiflu has become a nearly worthless drug against seasonal flu.

9. Public health officials are irresponsible in their omission of any ways to strengthen immunity against the flu. No options outside of problematic vaccines and anti-flu drugs are offered, despite the fact there is strong evidence that vitamins C and D activate the immune system and the trace mineral selenium prevents the worst form of the disease.
Anyone else gotten an email like this?

TheMercenary 10-07-2009 11:31 AM

Sounds like BS

Clodfobble 10-07-2009 01:37 PM

Do you have a cite that shows anything she says to be factually incorrect, Merc?

TheMercenary 10-07-2009 03:58 PM

It is the broad generalizations which are possibly based in fact but don't really make a cogent argument against the specific H1N1 vaccine, but they are the basis of the repeated arguments against vaccines of any kind.

Clodfobble 10-07-2009 04:53 PM

So, yes, the statements are factual. Got it.

You want something specific that makes the H1N1 shot more dangerous than the others? Looks to me like #2 and #4 do that, but it's faulty logic even if they didn't. Are you going to tell me that there's nothing unhealthy about smoking Camel cigarettes, since I can't prove to you that Camels are significantly worse for you than Pall Malls?

piercehawkeye45 10-07-2009 05:17 PM

Quote:

2. This is the first time both seasonal and pandemic flu vaccines will be administered. Both seasonal flu and swine flu vaccines will require two inoculations. This is because single inoculations have failed to produce sufficient antibodies. This is an admission that prior flu vaccines were virtually useless. Can you trust them this time?
I thought the reason why annual flu shots are offered is because the seasonal flu virus evolves so quickly that last year's immunity won't help this year?

Quote:

3. Adjuvants are added to vaccines to boost production of antibodies but may trigger autoimmune reactions. Some adjuvants are mercury (thimerosal), aluminum and squalene. Why would you sign a consent form for your children to be injected with mercury, which is even more brain-toxic than lead?
This is worded horribly or is complete bullshit. Just because mercury is an adjuvalnt doesn't mean it is the one being used.

Quote:

9. Public health officials are irresponsible in their omission of any ways to strengthen immunity against the flu. No options outside of problematic vaccines and anti-flu drugs are offered, despite the fact there is strong evidence that vitamins C and D activate the immune system and the trace mineral selenium prevents the worst form of the disease.
I do strongly agree with this though. A healthy diet is probably one of the best ways to avoid getting sick.

TheMercenary 10-07-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 599646)
So, yes, the statements are factual. Got it.

No actually, you don't "got it".

This is false:
Quote:

Both seasonal flu and swine flu vaccines will require two inoculations. This is because single inoculations have failed to produce sufficient antibodies. This is an admission that prior flu vaccines were virtually useless.
Fear mongering:
Quote:

Why would you sign a consent form for your children to be injected with mercury, which is even more brain-toxic than lead?
Opinion, not based in fact:
Quote:

Over-vaccination is a common practice now in America.
Misleading:
Quote:

Meanwhile, veterinarians have backed off of repeat vaccination in dogs because of observed side effects.
Incomplete data:
Quote:

Researchers are warning that over-use of the flu vaccine and anti-flu drugs like Tamiflu and Relenza can apply genetic pressure on flu viruses and then they are more likely to mutate into a more deadly strain.
False:
Quote:

Tamiflu has become a nearly worthless drug against seasonal flu.
Highly controversial:
Quote:

No options outside of problematic vaccines and anti-flu drugs are offered, despite the fact there is strong evidence that vitamins C and D activate the immune system and the trace mineral selenium prevents the worst form of the disease.




Quote:

Are you going to tell me that there's nothing unhealthy about smoking Camel cigarettes, since I can't prove to you that Camels are significantly worse for you than Pall Malls?
No.

Clodfobble 10-07-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45
This is worded horribly or is complete bullshit. Just because mercury is an adjuvalnt doesn't mean it is the one being used.

The seasonal flu shot this year contains thimerosal (mercury,) as it almost always does. The pandemic shots are about half thimerosal and half squalene, depending on the source (that is, half the shots are one and half are the other, not a mixture of the two in the same shot.)

jinx 10-07-2009 08:13 PM

Is FluMist for swine or seasonal flu?

TheMercenary 10-07-2009 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 599669)
Is FluMist for swine or seasonal flu?

They have both. But the only H1N1 vaccine out is in the mist form which should not be given to prego women.

jinx 10-07-2009 08:23 PM

What do you mean they have both? There is a name brand seasonal vaccine called Flumist, as well as an h1n1 vaccine with the same name? Or the seasonal FluMist contains h1n1? Same question for Fluzone.

jinx 10-07-2009 08:36 PM

If you choose to be vaccinated - pay attention to which one you are getting. Even if it's free at work or whatever.

Quote:

Afluria® is indicated for active immunization of persons age 18 and older against influenza disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B present in the vaccine. The indication is based on the immune response elicited by Afluria®; no controlled clinical studies have demonstrated a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Afluria®.

FLULAVAL is indicated for active immunization of adults (18 years of age and older) against influenza disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B contained in the vaccine. This indication is based on immune response elicited by FLULAVAL, and there have been no controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL. FLULAVAL is not indicated for use in children.

FLUARIX is indicated for active immunization of adults (18 years of age and older) against influenza disease caused by influenza virus types A and B contained in the vaccine. This indication is based on immune response elicited by FLUARIX, and there have been no controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLUARIX. FLUARIX IS NOT INDICATED FOR USE IN CHILDREN.

Influenza Virus Vaccine, Fluvirin vaccine, Types A and B (Surface Antigen) is a sterile parenteral for intramuscular use only. It is a purified sub-unit vaccine. Fluvirin vaccine is prepared from the extraembryonic fluid of embryonated chicken eggs inoculated with a specific type of influenza virus suspension containing neomycin and polymyxin. Multidose vial, 5-mL. Contains thimerosal, a mercury derivative (25 mcg mercury
per 0.5-mL dose). Thimerosal is added as a preservative.

Characteristics of Fluzone vaccine
* Fluzone vaccine contains three inactivated (killed) influenza viruses: type A (H1N1), type A (H3N2), and type B1,2
* Fluzone vaccine is a split virus vaccine; this type of vaccine is generally associated with fewer adverse reactions in children1,2
* Fluzone vaccine viruses are grown in chicken eggs and the final product contains small amounts of egg protein; therefore, it should not be given to anyone with hypersensivity to eggs or egg products1,2
* Fluzone vaccine is available in both pediatric (0.25mL per dose) and adult (0.5mL per dose) formulations1,2
* Fluzone vaccine is available with no thimerosal as a preservative (prefilled syringe) and with thimerosal as a preservative (multi-dose vial)1,2
* All presentations of Fluzone vaccine are latex free1,2


FluMist® is a vaccine indicated for active immunization of individuals 2 - 49 years of age against influenza disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B contained in the vaccine.
Each 0.2 mL dose contains 106.5-7.5 FFU (fluorescent focus units) of live attenuated influenza
virus reassortants of each of the three strains for the 2009-2010 season: A/South Dakota/6/2007
(H1N1) (an A/Brisbane/59/2007-like), A/Uruguay/716/2007 (H3N2) (an A/Brisbane/10/2007-like), and
B/Brisbane/60/2008. (3)
During the 2004-2005 flu season, a large study was done comparing FluMist to the flu shot. This study included over 4,000 children 2 years to 5 years of age. In this study, the group of children who received FluMist had fewer cases of flu than the group who received the flu shot. However, since flu strains change from year to year, past study results do not guarantee future flu season results.

In Adults, Shots are Best
- NYT article


TheMercenary 10-07-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

2009 H1N1 Vaccine
Every flu season has the potential to cause a lot of illness, doctor’s visits, hospitalizations and deaths. CDC is concerned that the new H1N1 flu virus could result in a particularly severe 2009-2010 flu season. Vaccines are the best tool we have to prevent influenza. CDC hopes that people will start to go out and get vaccinated against seasonal influenza as soon as vaccines become available at their doctor’s offices and in their communities. The seasonal flu vaccine is unlikely to provide protection against 2009 H1N1 influenza. However a 2009 H1N1 vaccine is currently in production and may be ready for the public in the fall. The 2009 H1N1 vaccine is not intended to replace the seasonal flu vaccine – it is intended to be used along-side seasonal flu vaccine.

CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a panel made up of medical and public health experts, met July 29, 2009, to make recommendations on who should receive the new H1N1 vaccine when it becomes available. While some issues are still unknown, such as how severe the flu season, the ACIP considered several factors, including current disease patterns, populations most at-risk for severe illness based on current trends in illness, hospitalizations and deaths, how much vaccine is expected to be available, and the timing of vaccine availability.

The groups recommended to receive the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine include:

Pregnant women because they are at higher risk of complications and can potentially provide protection to infants who cannot be vaccinated;
Household contacts and caregivers for children younger than 6 months of age because younger infants are at higher risk of influenza-related complications and cannot be vaccinated. Vaccination of those in close contact with infants younger than 6 months old might help protect infants by “cocooning” them from the virus;
Healthcare and emergency medical services personnel because infections among healthcare workers have been reported and this can be a potential source of infection for vulnerable patients. Also, increased absenteeism in this population could reduce healthcare system capacity;
All people from 6 months through 24 years of age
Children from 6 months through 18 years of age because cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza have been seen in children who are in close contact with each other in school and day care settings, which increases the likelihood of disease spread, and
Young adults 19 through 24 years of age because many cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza have been seen in these healthy young adults and they often live, work, and study in close proximity, and they are a frequently mobile population; and,
Persons aged 25 through 64 years who have health conditions associated with higher risk of medical complications from influenza.
No shortage of 2009 H1N1 vaccine is expected

http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/acip.htm

Clodfobble 10-07-2009 08:57 PM

Why does the CDC say babies under 6 months cannot get the flu shot, Merc?

jinx 10-07-2009 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 599670)
They have both. But the only H1N1 vaccine out is in the mist form which should not be given to prego women.

What's the name of it?
And not just preggos
Quote:

FluMist must not be given to: people with history of hypersensitivity to eggs, egg proteins, gentamicin, gelatin, or arginine; people with life-threatening reactions to previous influenza vaccinations; and children and adolescents receiving aspirin or aspirin-containing therapy.
The following people either may not be able to get FluMist or may be able to get it only in certain situations: children less than 24 months of age; people with asthma or active wheezing, or children less than 5 years of age with recurrent wheezing; people with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome; people with a weakened immune system; people with long-term medical conditions including heart disease, kidney disease, and metabolic diseases, such as diabetes; and pregnant women.

TheMercenary 10-07-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 599688)
What's the name of it?

I can't find it.

This was in our local paper today:
Quote:

Area health departments receive H1N1 vaccine
Healthy 2- to 4-year-olds given priority for nasal spray vaccine
Posted: October 7, 2009 - 12:15amAdvertisement
By Dana Clark Felty
Toddlers are most likely to spread colds and viruses and suffer worst from the flu, public health officials say.

That's why 2- to 4-year-olds will be the first to receive the area's first shipment of H1N1 vaccine.

"We know that 2- to 4-year-olds are a group that is experiencing a high rate of hospitalization from H1N1, and we know they're very effective at spreading germs," said Dr. Diane Weems, chief medical officer for the Coastal Health District.

The District's eight-county region will receive 3,200 doses this week, about 6 percent of the initial batch of 54,800 doses of vaccine received by the state.

Healthy children visiting public health clinics with their parents in Bryan, Camden, Chatham, Effingham, Glynn, McIntosh, Liberty and Long counties will be offered H1N1 vaccine in the form of nasal spray.

Late this week or next week, some doses will be distributed to private and nonprofit clinics that have expressed an interest in ordering vaccine for their patients, Weems said.

"The hope is that as parents take their children to their pediatricians office, they may be able to access the vaccine or talk to their pediatrician about the vaccine," she said.

More vaccine is expected in coming weeks, as nasal spray and injections.

Public health officials say the spray contains live flu virus, but cannot cause the flu. Side effects include low-grade fever, runny nose, nasal congestion and cough.

Spray vaccine takes less time than shots to produce, which is why it was the first to become available. Public clinics will not charge for the vaccine itself but may charge an administrative fee that can be billed to Medicaid, Medicare and some private insurance companies.

The spray vaccine requires two doses, about a month apart, for children younger than 10.

Local officials expect more shipments to arrive in time for patients to receive their second doses.

Facts about H1N1 vaccine
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend getting vaccinated as soon as vaccine is available. Area health departments now have H1N1 flu vaccine in the form of nasal spray for healthy children 2 to 4 years old.
-- The H1N1 vaccine does not prevent seasonal flu.
-- The nasal spray does not contain thimerosal or other preservatives some people believe are linked to autism.
-- The vaccine requires two doses - about a month apart - for children younger than 10.
-- Officials say the spray contains live flu virus, but cannot cause the flu.
-- Side effects include low-grade fever, runny nose, nasal congestion and cough.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
http://savannahnow.com/news/2009-10-...e-h1n1-vaccine

jinx 10-24-2009 01:02 PM

While the CDC claims that "Most flu cases are H1N1", even though

Quote:

In late July, the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases.
CBS does their own research state by state, and finds otherwise.

Quote:

If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn’t have H1N1 flu.

In fact, you probably didn’t have flu at all.

It’s unknown what patients who tested negative for flu were actually afflicted with since the illness was not otherwise determined. Health experts say it’s assumed the patients had some sort of cold or upper respiratory infection that is just not influenza.

With most cases diagnosed solely on symptoms and risk factors, the H1N1 flu epidemic may seem worse than it is.
http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2...age5404580.gif

capnhowdy 10-25-2009 07:42 AM

And now Hussein 'Bama declares we have a state of emergency.

TheMercenary 10-25-2009 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jinx (Post 603021)
While the CDC claims that "Most flu cases are H1N1", even though

Funny. I have heard nothing but the opposit. Most cases are and have always been the routine seasonal flu.

Jaydaan 10-25-2009 12:24 PM

My best friend and her hubby (who live in the suite below us and we spend a lot of time with) Just went through a week of the flu. It was first diagnosed as a chest infection, then progressed to a full out vomit fest with a nasty high fever. They took blood and did confirm H1N1. They isolated themselves, and even the three of us living upstairs took two days "quarantine/movie watching" We would not have gone to that drastic of a measure except we had accidentally switched wine glasses twice on Wed night. And her and my hubby shared a smoke, instead of smoking two at the time. Add to that I had a sore throat and slight cough, hubby had a cough and the chills... we did not want to get anyone sick. The health department here is telling us that we are contagious 24 hours BEFORE first symptoms, and up to 48 hours After the fever has broke. We all work in a hotel/banquet/beer store (same building) and did not want to be blamed for giving some 400 quests a a wedding H1N1 because we were sick. Problem is, I doubt everyone working there will be as cautious. So, so far H1N1 has hit 40% of our household... lets hope that is all.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.