![]() |
Its not just the people on the plane that are the problem. Its when the plane gets used as a weapon - ie: its flown into a building and such. The collateral damage is much greater than just the passengers and one planeload of people. It affects more, much more than just the people flying.
|
Quote:
|
It had never happened before and hasn't happened since.
|
Quote:
|
Unless they're the pilot. Then we'll be sorry we locked those doors!
|
No, because if it's the pilot you can't stop him from crashing anyway, even with an unlocked door. You might be able to keep him from hitting a particular building, but I doubt he'd announce it beforehand.
|
This guy has an artificial hip, so he sets off the metal detector every single time he flies... and so he gets the pat-down every single time he flies... which is quite often. So here he strips down to a speedo when going through the metal detector, so he can show once and for all what's going on.
They refuse to let him board, and make him go through security again with his pants on, so they can pat him down. It's just the utter insanity that gets me on this one. It's come to this: there is a complete lack of logic or common sense involved here. That tells us that the system is ineffective by design. The lowest level employee is not empowered to make the simplest of decisions. As a result, enormous time is wasted on things that are obviously not security threats. TSA workers are often compared to McDonalds workers. That's unfair. I've worked at McDonalds. Ordinary employees are allowed to make common sense decisions. A simple decision like Hey, cleaning fluid got on the burgers, so we have to throw the burgers out, is made by McDonald's employees all the time. A TSA employee would not be allowed to make that call. So it leads to this. |
More correctly, TSA employees should be compared to people who could not get hired as McDonald's employees.
There is a use for people who are incapable of thinking for themselves: Suicide missions and cannon fodder. |
Quote:
Can you imagine how a TSA employee would be cricified if (s)he let someone through, and that someone blew up a plane? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All the TSA people will quit their jobs then everyone will bitch that they don't want to work and want handouts.
Seriously, it's not the employees' fault. I bet they lose their job if they stray even slightly from the protocol. It seems rather harsh to judge the people who are just doing what they're told to do, saying they must be more stupid than fast food employees. *knocks on people's heads* I'm not saying it's not a stupid stupid stupid policy, but the employees have no say in the matter, I'm sure. "You do your job as best you can within your limits." What limits do you suppose the TSA puts on its employees? Do you think they would love to use common sense? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Otherwise, their ass in on the line. They don't get to pick and choose. It is, I'm sure, a very set protocol. I bet their procedures dont' allow for individual expression. I think this is where people are getting way off track. In other words, everyone is raping the messenger. The messenger just doesn't want to be unemployed in this economy. *shrug* |
I'm sure their protocol is extremely rigid, just as it is here in the EMS world. Public safety has gotten that way over the years in all forms fire, EMS, police, TSA, etc. Deviate and you're screwed because that protocol is your Bible and you better have it memorized word for word. I get tired of seeing people in pain and family members suffering all the time, but it's my job that I chose and I wouldn't be here if I wasn't willing to deal with it.
I have a degree of sympathy for them in regards to just needing the job in this economy. They're in a sucky situation, I'm sure many of them were employed long before the enhanced pat downs and scanners were implemented. What should they do, quit over moral issues? Not in this economy. |
Quote:
Maybe not more stupid, maybe more stupid. I was talking about the ability to think for yourself and within that concept is encompassed "despite what your superiors may have told you." And I stand by my original assertion, we need people like that, people who follow orders without question. "Run into that cave and flush out the enemy? Fuck you, sarge." <---not that kind of attitude. |
How many people sign up for this job now, do you think? Before it probably held a little prestige, now maybe not so much. I'd be hard pressed to go for it.
|
never name the well you won't drink from
|
Ha...good point, but the odds are really slim.
|
I sure wouldn't want to do that job. But I don't want the one I have. :rolleyes:
Thing is, they pay me...and it takes money to not be homeless. Unless you have rich relatives or something, I guess. I doubt that's the case for most of those people, or else many would rise up and say "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore." |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Those were two different issues. I don't feel sorry for them if something happens after they follow all their protocol. And neither should they. I do feel sorry for their economic position of just needing a job in this economy, and many probably don't like the new rules and procedures any more than the average passenger.
|
1 Attachment(s)
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."
|
That dude is totally playing with himself.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.