![]() |
Quote:
So I figure I may as well act as ultra left wing as I please - hell, I may even join the communist party (IS there still a communist party?). No liberal excess is going to be too much for me, since I'm going to be rounded up regardless. ;) |
Quote:
Rambo "they drew first blood colonel, now i am going to make them pay. they took my money, now i'm going to destroy the welfare system from the inside" Deathrace 2000 "1300 points for a democrat, 4000 for anyone named reagan" anyone else have ideas here? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My bad dawg! |
IMO you don't have to be black to be a nigger. But I'm trying to curtail labelling people....
|
I'm not paraphrasing anyone. America is falling apart and you are either part of the problem, or you are part of the solution. Those who vote for Republicans or Democrats are the problem. They perpetuate and worsen the problem by voting over and over for the people who created the problem in the first place. They make government larger, costlier, and more intrusive. Those who vote for these people are responsible for poverty, sickness due to lack of healthcare, unemployment, poor education, loss of freedom, attacks on civil rights, and even murder. :mad:
Guys like me are the ONLY ones who will actually take steps to fix the problems those people have caused. |
But you'll never get elected because you have the personality and charm of a shit sandwich.
|
nicely put. That and a few cherries short of a cake.
|
are all dems and reps a part of the evil hoard? because i was thinking that our elected officials are each individual souls. unfortunately most of them are affiliated with one of the parties, because that is the only way to have a real chance at being elected.
i take issue with someone who will only vote if there is a D or an R next to a name. but i won't refuse to vote for someone with a D or an R either. step back, look at the individuals. does there philosophy match with what you think is the right course for the country? vote for them. be aware that they will fail and disappoint you at times, no matter how good they are. if they prove to disappoint too often don't vote for them. but your stance that everyone else is the problem and only you and your select few like minded individuals is a little over the top. you may actually have more people swayed to your philosophy if brought the rhetoric down a notch. i don't disagree with everything you say, but i find myself pissed when i do agree with you oftentimes simply because your approach to most issues is so annoying to me. but back to the earlier issue: i am not reagan's biggest fan, but have some respect for the office, if not the man. i think that is a major problem in america today. people have forgotten that whether or not we like "pres john jones" or not, he is the president. show respect for the office, if you can't manage it for the man. IMO the R's started a very nasty tradition in 92/3 when they decided to go after clinton on a personal level all the way through his presedency. the D's have picked up where they left off and gone after bush in the same way. how can we expect the world to show respect to our leaders if we don't? edit: spelling |
Quote:
I appreciate your passion, radar. I agree with what you're saying. but, OC has a point. you could do with a bit more decorum, and you'd win more people over to the good guy's team. know what i'm saying? this goes back to the frustration i started to express earlier. We're on the same side of things usually, but you go about arguing our side in such a way as to make me cringe. oh, and just in case you actually DO use your ignore feature, this is what cougar said that i was referring to: Quote:
|
I really think he uses it. It's the "LALALALALALA" feature for him. I'm a blithering idiot, remember?
|
yeah, i remember. marichiko is too. got it.
|
He's directly responded to at least one post I've made since he claimed I was on ignore so even if he does have it on, he still reads them.
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'll readily admit that sometimes my fatal flaw is that I am more interested in winning arguments than in winning people. But generally those who want to argue aren't interested in change anyway. Quote:
And as far as getting elected, I absolutely will be elected without a doubt. It will most likely be a lower office at first like city council, but I'll work my way up. I will be a member of Congress or higher before I die and some statist wants to spit on my casket and piss on my headstone. It's also ironic to see someone with so little tact and total lack of charm or class suggesting I can't be elected for lack of charm when they use phrases like "shit sandwich". |
He must find you worthy of arguing with, then.
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Radar
Quote:
One scenario: since the gummint has no tax money to build roads, that means that all roads are privately supplied meaning they are all toll-roads meaning you'll DIE on the way to the hospital because you can't pay the TOLL to get there because you forgot your WALLET - wait, there are NO public ambulances. Wait, there's only ONE hospital - for the wealthiest of citizens (no hospitals can be built with tax money) and since you are an elected official -a servant of the people, that probably doesn't include you - unless you are corrupt which for now, I'll assume you aren't. SO, you die and get to spend the rest of eternity roasting on a bar-b-que spit next to former president Reagan and y'all can spit and urinate on each other for ever and ever and ever. Not such a pretty vision, now is it? Here, I'll save you the trouble: Beestie, you ignorant slut. Love, Radar. |
I like the acronym UT used... WOTR... World According to Radar.
Mostly because it pissed Radar off when he used it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by lumberjim
Quote:
|
no, technically in any proper acronym you use the 4th letter of the 2nd word if you are creating it on the 3rd tuesday of a month with more than 3 letters in its name on a partially cloudy day after blinking 3 times with your left eye.
just wanted to clear up any confusion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a little tired by now, that's all. the whole martyr thing you two do. it must make you nuts that he put you on his list. it's fairly obvious that it does. don't you think that when radar is logged in under "spivey" that he sees it and laughs heartily to himself? is that what you want? no, i don't think so. so, my ADVICE. ( not a rule, bruce) is to ignore him too. not with the ignore feature, but with your buddhism. radar is but a wave breaking against your consciousness unless you let him in. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
goddammit. and i was just touting your sense of humor. lighten up, people!
|
Quote:
|
Just this one time.....
|
Quote:
|
ok. your beating is back on.
aaaahhhfice, fucker. |
Quote:
|
Steve spent 12 years in Jersey, and the way he says coffee cracks me up.
co-wah-fee |
Quote:
ok, radar. sigh. |
Want some ketchup with that shit sammich, Jim?
Might go down easier. |
still a shit sammich......just ketchupier.......
did i steal that from Hmonkey or jag?.... |
Out in the west, there is a saying about "eating the shit sammich", referring to the shit we all eat in life. It's evolved to "You want ketchup with your shit sammich?", ketchup being the universal lubricant, as in you won't taste so much of the shit.
Here, I was eluding to my previous comment about Radar's personality being like a shit sandwich, and your obvious frustration. |
Quote:
It's an ugly word for an ugly human being. |
[quote]Originally posted by lookout123
people have forgotten that whether or not we like "pres john jones" or not, he is the president. show respect for the office, if you can't manage it for the man. [quote] This I have often heard from Americans and I have not understood.. I don't think it a healty attitude to hold too much reverence or respect for a politician. What ever their party colours, by nature of having arrived to the top of "the greasy pole" some of the grease has probably rubbed off on to them. They have power and could abuse it, a cynical disrespectful attitude would be a more healthy attitude. If you need a national figurehead, I think it would be better to do as other countries do, seperate the job into prime minister a politician and head of state (President or if you must King) a non-politician. The Head of States job is figurehead and protection of the constitution. Remember, the purpose of democrary is to save us from tyranny |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nah...gotta keep things fresh.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know I have a tendency to do the "martyr thing." I apologize for this, and I've apologized before, and I'll probably have to apologize again at some point. One symptom of my neurological difficulty is that my temper has become paper thin. I used to be the most easy going person in the world, and now look at me cross-eyed and I turn into a bitch, I admit it. I don't like bringing this point up because to me it feels like a cop out ("oh I'm a sick person, I can't help myself" whine, whine, whine. I actually DO try to avoid doing such things). If you want to read just a little of my story it's here: http://www.csindy.com/csindy/2003-12-18/cover.html But its not required reading by any means. I didn't know Radar had a "nome de guerre." Doesn't it say somewhere on this board that you can't do that? So that's news to me. How do I explain my situation without coming off as whining? That's a serious question, and I'd love a serious reply. Should I make no mention of it when someone does me an incredible kindness? Should I avoid expressing my frustration when I make some REALLY stupid mistake because of my memory? Should I never mention the fact that I'm terrified much of the time because I don't know what's going to happen to me? Maybe bringing those things up is "playing the martyr", but those things are just basic facts of my life. So how do I get a "nome de guerre"? I was just thinking how I'd love to impersonate the person I once was and create a cyber character for myself where the past 7 or 8 years of my life never happened. I don't like being critisized any more than anyone else does. I'm tired of always feeling like I need to defend myself. Tell me how to pull off the name change and you got it. |
I htink the martyr comment was just referring to you and Onyx "playing martyr" over RADAR's ignore list. I hope that's all it was anyway, because I dont see that you have been the martyr over your disability at all.
|
Since when did I play martyr? Especially over fuckwit's ignore list? Like I give a rat's ass. I think it's funny that he turns off any opinion that disagrees with his and belittles any ideas but ones that agree with his.
How is that me being a martyr? |
Quote:
Fucker. |
[quote]Originally posted by Yelof
[quote]Originally posted by lookout123 people have forgotten that whether or not we like "pres john jones" or not, he is the president. show respect for the office, if you can't manage it for the man. Quote:
Respect the office is fine, but ex-presidents go in the same bin with ex-wives. :) |
i think you guys are getting the ideas of "respect" and "blindly worship" mixed up. they shouldn't get a free pass from any negative comment about them, but damn - we have fallen a long way from the days when the media wouldn't photograph FDR in awkward positions with his wheelchair - they generally tried to get standing shots of him. they did this from a desire to show the office respect. the president should not be seen as weak and unsupported. it is difficult for the rest of the world to respect him/the office if all the world sees is our own citizens endlessly disrespecting the man/the office of the president.
both parties and the media are equally guilty of dragging the presidency through the mud. i see no problem in going after the policies/politics of the individual, but i have a serious problem with going after the individual. it is not helpful to anyone, and i believe it is just plain wrong. |
Quote:
|
With all due respect, guys, it's all about perception. I don't respect our current president, and I'm sure there are plenty of people that didn't respect Reagan. Just because someone doesn't respect the person doesn't make them bad.
As far as Radar...well, I think this should answer your questions: http://ciberbosque.org/images/sycamore/koolaid4.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One and two definitely do not apply... I only suffer unto Radar when he opens his flap, and since I'm not under great suffering, and I don't want anyone's sympathy (in this case, it doesn't matter even if I did..I mean, it's Radar...) I would say, nope, you're wrong Syc. |
Eh, wrong person, Onyx.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what i said had nothing at all to do with your symptoms. Not unless whining is one of the symptoms of CO poisoning or depression. but, since you brought it up....again: The thing about a message board is that it levels the playing field. you could be a quadriplegic pygmi homosexual typing with your penis, and i wouldnt know the difference. it also means that you should stop trying to use it as an excuse or a defense for what you write. Don't think i'm saying this to be mean to you. You're a big girl, and I think you can tell the difference between mean spirited attacks, and plainly stated feedback from someone who cares enough to tell you about it. If you ever see me come out of the bathroom with toilet paper stuck to my shoe, or a booger hanging from a nose hair, or my fly is down, I want you to tell me about it immediately. If I have bad breath, tell me. I'd rather be embarrassed and know it than embarrassed and not know it. I rip on you because I feel that it is my duty. Just ask Perth. |
Glad to hear you have such a strong sense of duty. :p
One other thing. I went back and actually wrote down the names of the people who "contributed" to this, and how many posts each made, and there were lots of folks besides me and Onyx making comments about Radar. I also noticed that you jumped right in quite a few times to heighten the effect - like quoting Onyx's remarks so Radar could see them, and it was YOU who reminded me that Radar had called me a "blithering idiot" and it was also you who accused Radar of "spying" on posts under a different name. If you don't like the smell, I suggest you quit stirring the shit. |
Quote:
|
and it was also you who accused Radar of "spying" on posts under a different name
Jesus Christ guys, was I the only person who got the joke about Radar being Spivey? Do you REMEMBER Spivey's posts? It was a joke. See, watch: "Sometimes Lumberjim logs on as Perry5 just to stir the shit some more..." See how that was humor, because they're obviously different people but on an ironic level there are similarities? It's like every time Radar is involved in a thread the rest of you lose all sense of perspective. |
I don't remember Spivey's. In fact I don't remember a Spivey. I never heard the name before Jim mentioned it.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.