The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Weird News (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=16997)

Sundae 04-14-2013 04:28 AM

Blimey, all those cars zhooming past! (not a typo, an attempt at onomatopoeia)
And then some git-face decides to beep him when it must be obvious why he is in the middle of the road. Saving a beaver here, people!

I thought Canucks were supposed to be polite!

ZenGum 04-14-2013 07:12 AM

We just had a fireman end up in hospital with minor injuries after he fell out of a tree while attempting to rescue a koala.


From a tree.


Errrmmm....


Okay, it was in the suburbs, and said koala had just run across a road, narrowly avoiding death, and was now in a tree from which the most plausible exits were also across dangerous roads. It did need assistance. But, the national parks people have long lasso-on-a-stick devices which can secure a koala without some human attempting to out-climb it.

orthodoc 04-14-2013 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae (Post 860653)
I thought Canucks were supposed to be polite!

That's just in the tourist brochures. ;)

ZenGum 04-14-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae (Post 860653)

I thought Canucks were supposed to be polite!

Quote:

Originally Posted by orthodoc (Post 860671)
Sorry!

FTFY

footfootfoot 04-14-2013 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 860670)
We just had a fireman end up in hospital with minor injuries after he fell out of a tree while attempting to rescue a koala.


From a tree.


Errrmmm....


Okay, it was in the suburbs, and said koala had just run across a road, narrowly avoiding death, and was now in a tree from which the most plausible exits were also across dangerous roads. It did need assistance. But, the national parks people have long lasso-on-a-stick devices which can secure a koala without some human attempting to out-climb it.

I have it on good authority that is was actually a drop bear, but that fact was covered up to prevent panic. Actually one fireman was killed and the other was horribly mutilated.

ZenGum 04-15-2013 06:29 AM

I guess that's why they sent in the drop firefighter.

footfootfoot 04-15-2013 08:30 AM

I think they sent this dude.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McHViMSzQdI&t=5m5s

Pete Zicato 04-15-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 860766)
I guess that's why they sent in the drop firefighter.

Ha! :D

Gravdigr 04-26-2013 12:07 PM

US sailor thwarts Dubai bus driver rapist after putting him in strangehold with her thighs and then beating him into submission

Go Navy!

ZenGum 04-26-2013 07:38 PM

I whole-heartedly approve of this. Sister should go and give lessons to the bus-riding women of India.

Gravdigr 04-28-2013 02:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Now this really pulling one outta ya ass:

Attachment 43871

ZenGum 04-28-2013 06:45 PM

:lol:

If she vomited, would it look like peas and karats?

xoxoxoBruce 04-28-2013 11:14 PM

Anyone who's had a colonoscopy, knows the doctor didn't retrieve the stone.:eyebrow:

ZenGum 04-30-2013 08:06 AM

PUSSY SHAVER STRIKES AGAIN

Oh Darwin, you never fail to amuse.

ZenGum 05-07-2013 08:11 AM

http://www.natureworldnews.com/artic...nes-photos.htm

That's right, the link says http ://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/1313/20130410/eel-shoved-up-mans-anus-eats-way-through-intestines-photos.htm

You might want to think about that before you click.

Sundae 05-07-2013 08:30 AM

Glad for the warning Zen.
Will I be clicking?

No.

Lamplighter 05-07-2013 08:34 AM

What do Jenny McCarthy and January Jones have in common ?

The Register-Guard
Lauren Gambino
The Associated Press
5/7/13

Senate approves bill to let mothers keep placentas
Quote:

SALEM — The Oregon Legislature has agreed that mothers who
have just given birth should be able to take home their placentas.<snip>
Under current state law, hospitals are prohibited from releasing
hazardous medical waste, which includes human placentas.
Some Oregon hospitals, however, have allowed mothers to take home
their placentas for cultural and religious reasons.

Some mothers have their placentas put into capsules,
which they consume in the belief it boosts their energy
and staves off post-partum depression.<snip>

Actress January Jones spotlighted the issue when she claimed that
ingesting her placenta helped boost her energy and get her back to work
just weeks after giving birth.

Experts have said there is no scientific evidence of a health benefit.

“There’s no scientific evidence stating that it’s entirely safe,” said
Dr. Mark Kristal, a behavioral neuroscientist at the University of Buffalo.

Kristal said placenta-eating was first reported in the 1970s
when people living in communes cooked the organ into stew.
The increasing number of American women eating their placentas
today means the fad is back, he said.
<snip>

glatt 05-07-2013 08:45 AM

cannibals

Sundae 05-07-2013 09:03 AM

I wouldn't be squeamish about eating placenta.
If it was given freely and well seasoned. Like drinking breast milk - I wouldn't have it direct from the source, but I have no problem with it.

Then again I'm European ;)
Except when I want to call myself a Briton.
Or English.
Or a Southerner....

Clodfobble 05-07-2013 09:23 AM

Quote:

Kristal said placenta-eating was first reported in the 1970s
when people living in communes cooked the organ into stew.
Kristal is obviously not up on her anthropology. Many ancient societies ate the placenta, and many animals instinctively do it today. When food is scarce, you don't let that many nutrients go to waste.

I'm not saying I would do it, but it's silly to pretend this is somehow a modern invention.

footfootfoot 05-07-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 864310)
Kristal is obviously not up on her anthropology. Many ancient societies ate the placenta, and many animals instinctively do it today. When food is scarce, you don't let that many nutrients go to waste.

I'm not saying I would do it, but it's silly to pretend this is somehow a modern invention.

Not to mention that predators can smell that shit a million miles away and will come and eat your defenseless ass and that of your hard-got babbehs.

Clodfobble's obviously not up on her predatory thinking.:p:

footfootfoot 05-07-2013 05:30 PM

But, that's not why I'm here. I'm here for this bit of sickening irony. Enough iron in this irony to build an aircraft carrier...

Quote:

Head of U.S. Air Force's anti-sexual assault unit arrested for sexual battery

Sheldonrs 05-07-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot (Post 864346)
But, that's not why I'm here. I'm here for this bit of sickening irony. Enough iron in this irony to build an aircraft carrier...

Talk about letting the fox guard the hen house.

Pete Zicato 05-08-2013 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs (Post 864350)
Talk about letting the fox guard the hen house.

Wouldn't that be the wolf guarding the foxes?

ZenGum 05-09-2013 04:51 AM

"Research, your honor."

glatt 05-09-2013 08:27 AM

Vegetarian catches anthrax while eating salad at drum circle.

Here's how it happened. An anthrax infected goat in Africa was skinned and made into a drum head. The drum was brought to New Hampshire, and played in a basement multipurpose room drum circle. Hitting the dried drum head aerosolized the anthrax bacteria, which then floated across the room and onto the salad. She ate the salad.

You just never freakin' know.

Lamplighter 05-09-2013 09:20 AM

Aerialized spores from the drums is likely, but this article doesn't
really incriminate the lettuce. But so be it, CDC may have good evidence for it.

It does remind me of my first (1960's) and worst (potentially) career mistake.

As a graduate teaching assistance for a course in Medical Microbiology,
one of my first assignments was to set up a class exercise to demonstrate "virulence".
That is, how one strain of a pathogenic microorganism can
produce severe disease while another strain does not.

So I wrote a letter on university stationery to Fort Detrick, MD,
the US Army's Center for Biological Warfare, asking for
one culture of virulent- and one of avirulent- B.anthrasus.
Within a few days, the cultures arrived, along with a letter giving the LD50 .
This is the dose (number of cells/spores) it takes to kill 50% of the animals infected.

The LD50 for avirulent strain was something like billions.
In other words, you could not inject enough to kill 50% of the mice.
The LD50 for that virulent strain of anthrax was 1. :eek:

This so scared the bejesus out of me and I immediately
autoclaved the entire package for several hours.

It also gave me a lifelong fear of what the military was capable of
doing to "prevent and protect" the US from biological warfare.

glatt 05-09-2013 10:01 AM

Funny how times change. They just mailed that shit to you.

My dad as a physics prof had an underground closet in his old lab that was full of radioactive samples. Dangerously radioactive samples. About 20 years ago, as various regulation were getting tighter, he started worrying about the stuff and worked really hard to get rid of all of it through quickly disappearing appropriate channels. If he had waited any longer, he would have had to devote the entire department budget to paying to get rid of the stuff. He had pulled one sample out of there once to show me, and the sample actually glowed in the dark. Very cool. Actually, now that I think about it, he took my grandmother's radium clock up there to get rid of it. That clock was cool. Its hands would glow in the dark too.

Lamplighter 05-10-2013 08:34 AM

I hope the hackers were also smart enough to get
the movie rights to this scheme.
It smacks of George Clooney and Julia Roberts

NY Times
MARC SANTORA
Published: May 9, 2013
In Hours, Thieves Took $45 Million in A.T.M. Scheme
Quote:

It was a brazen bank heist, but a 21st-century version in which
the criminals never wore ski masks, threatened a teller or set foot in a vault.

In two precision operations that involved people in more than two dozen
countries acting in close coordination and with surgical precision,
thieves stole $45 million from thousands of A.T.M.’s in a matter of hours.

In New York City alone, the thieves responsible for A.T.M. withdrawals
struck 2,904 machines over 10 hours starting on Feb. 19, withdrawing $2.4 million.
<snip>
The hackers, who are not named in the indictment, then raised the withdrawal limits
on prepaid MasterCard debit accounts issued by the National Bank of Ras Al-Khaimah,
also known as RakBank, which is in United Arab Emirates.
<snip>
With five account numbers in hand, the hackers distributed the information
to individuals in 20 countries who then encoded the information on magnetic-stripe cards.
On Dec. 21, the cashing crews made 4,500 A.T.M. transactions worldwide,
stealing $5 million, according to the indictment.

While the street crews were taking money out of bank machines, the computer experts
were watching the financial transactions from afar, ensuring that they would
not be shortchanged on their cut, according to court documents.
<snip>

glatt 05-10-2013 08:40 AM

We live in interesting times.

Lamplighter 05-11-2013 09:19 AM

The Columbian
PDX stripper fights $1K federal fine
5/10/13
Quote:

PORTLAND — John Brennan, who stripped naked last year
to protest a security check at Portland International Airport,
said he expects to lose the first round of his legal fight against a $1,000 fine.

Still, he plans to press his free-speech argument in an appeal
and push for effective security checks that aren't as invasive.
"I totally support airport screening," Brennan said.
"I just don't want it to be at the expense of my constitutional rights."<snip>

In April 2012, as Brennan started a business trip to California,
he declined to step into a Transportation Security Administration body scanner.
He was asked to walk through a metal detector and submit to a pat-down.
A screener said traces of nitrates, which could indicate an explosive, were detected.
Brennan took off his clothes to show he wasn't carrying anything explosive
and to get the security check over quickly, he said.<snip>

In July, a judge in Multnomah County found Brennan not guilty
of violating a Portland ordinance that forbids exposing genitals in public
and in the presence of the opposite sex.
The judge said Brennan was acting in protest and his strip was protected speech.

A few weeks later, Brennan said, he was told he'd be fined for violating
a rule that forbids passengers to interfere with, assault, threaten or intimidate the screeners.

Flint 05-12-2013 11:43 PM

Sounds he like he was complying with the explicit purpose of the entire procedure--albeit more thoroughly and willingly than was requested. I would rather he ditch the 'free speech' argument and argue directly that this is what they wanted, so this is what they got. What is it--jump this high, but no further? No, goddamnit, if you want to pry into a man's privacy you will pry all the way or not at all--you don't get to pick and choose.

footfootfoot 05-14-2013 10:52 AM

"We only want to look into your anal cavity, we have no desire to look into your pee pee hole, sir."

People need to start defecating and urinating during these searches with an apology of "I was nervous" speaking as someone who has really cleaned up more than enough poop and pee accidents I'm fairly certain that they'll decide they'd cleaned up enough poo and pee.

Or not.

glatt 05-14-2013 11:04 AM

Problem is the people in power aren't the ones cleaning up the poo. So they will just helpfully say "make sure to wear gloves."

BigV 05-14-2013 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 865086)
Problem is the people in power aren't the ones cleaning up the poo. So they will just helpfully say "make sure to wear gloves."

waaaitaminit.

Aren't *WE* the "people in power"? I know we're not the people who directly write the rules (or pick up the poo). I like the strategy of making this onerous policy even more onerous in the hopes that it will be abandoned, but I agree that this is applying leverage at the wrong place. I think the right place to apply leverage would be where changes in the policy could be made--those people who make the rules--lawmakers, administrators, etc. If *they* were subjected to the same indignities and hassles and costs (and for the same justification, namely none), I think the likelihood of having some reasonable changes made would improve.

The question then becomes "how can we make those people eat their own dog food?" That, I don't know. I imagine such people are exempted from the searches (and the lines!) and therefore don't really get it. Right now, it works out that the people that benefit (and decide) from the rules are not the people paying the costs. That disconnect is a recipe for trouble everywhere it occurs.

footfootfoot 05-14-2013 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 865086)
Problem is the people in power aren't the ones cleaning up the poo. So they will just helpfully say "make sure to wear gloves."

Explosive diarrhea?

ZenGum 05-14-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigV (Post 865091)
waaaitaminit.

Aren't *WE* the "people in power"?

Have you been paying any attention at all for the last thirty years???

infinite monkey 05-14-2013 07:17 PM

ouija people
in order to form...

footfootfoot 05-14-2013 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infinite monkey (Post 865140)
ouija people
in order to form...

haggii

Ocean's Edge 05-16-2013 12:35 PM

Ok.. well only a little bit 'Weird' but, the organization I volunteer with was instrumental in making this 'Med-evac flight for a turtle' happen..

http://www.cbc.ca/ontariomorning/epi...peterborough/#

xoxoxoBruce 05-16-2013 08:31 PM

OMG, imagine waiting for this woman to pick out an outfit. :zzz:

Quote:

Newcastle University neuroscientist Dr. Gabriele Jordan, recently announced that she has identified a woman who is a "tetrachromat," that is, a woman with the ability to see much greater color depth than the ordinary person.
~snip~
Most people have three types of cones, and are said to be "trichromats." Color blind individuals have only two types of cones and they are said to be "dichromats." Almost all animals, including dogs and New World Monkeys are dichromats.
However, scientists have long believed that there are people with four cones who can see a wider range of colors than most of us can detect. These persons are called "tetrachromats," and can see a hundred million colors.

link

Clodfobble 05-17-2013 11:35 AM

Well that's cool. I wonder if her ability to see infrared and ultraviolet are enhanced as well.

BigV 05-17-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble (Post 865393)
Well that's cool. I wonder if her ability to see infrared and ultraviolet are enhanced as well.

Certainly some creatures can. I strongly suggest you enjoy this episode from Radiolab, Ripping the Rainbow a New One.

Quote:

We tear into this show with a dark scene from 1665. A young Isaac Newton, hoping to ride out the plague by heading to the country to puzzle over the deep mysteries of the universe, finds himself wondering about light. And vision. He wants to get to the bottom of where color comes from--is it a physical property in the outside world, or something created back inside your eyeball somewhere? James Gleick explains how Newton unlocked the mystery of the rainbow. And, as Victoria Finlay tells us, sucked the poetry out of the heavens.

Jonah Lehrer restores some of the lost magic by way of Goethe--who turned a simple observation into a deep thought: even though color starts in the physical world, it is finished in our minds.

Which, thanks to Mark Changizi, brings us to a very serious question: what do dogs see when they look at the rainbow? We humans see seven colors: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet (ROYGBiV!). But as Thomas Cronin and Jay Neitz--two guys who study vision--explain, that's just a sliver of the spectrum. Along the way, we get some help imagining the rainbow from a choir, and we meet this little sea creature, who with 16 color receptors, blows the rest of us earthlings out of the water:

Lamplighter 05-17-2013 01:32 PM

2 Attachment(s)
On another forum, I asked a similar question about Hunter's Orange and how it was seen by those who are color-blind.
These pics of a cormorant was one reply.

Attachment 44067 Attachment 44068


When this pic was taken, it was in the process of getting it's head screwed on right.

glatt 05-17-2013 02:04 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Here's a simple test. Do you see the number 8?
This measures red/green color blindness.
Attachment 44069




How about this one? Can you see the number 7?
This one measures the more rare blue/yellow color blindness.
Attachment 44070


[/fucking with you]

glatt 05-17-2013 02:05 PM

:p:

footfootfoot 05-17-2013 02:49 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Last year I did a lot of research into deer color vision, it's quite comlpex, actually. There are some programs for web designers that approximate the different types of human color blindness that allow you to test your web colors to see how they will appear to a color blind person.
One is called Visicheck the other is ColorOracle

I'lll look around for some photos and graphs I downloaded. In the meantime, here is a good article.

Lamplighter 05-17-2013 02:53 PM

Saturday's Powerball jackpot now a record $600 million

Now tell me:Someone has to win it, it might as well be...

Sundae 05-18-2013 03:48 AM

Euromillions last night was £54m ($83m).
I haven't checked the results yet. It's fun to dream a little longer.

I have my house and car picked out already.

richlevy 05-18-2013 03:03 PM

Well, I did give you all of the luck from that penny I found (heads side up). Considering that the universe already owes you some good luck, that should put you over the top.

Good times are coming.

tw 05-18-2013 04:28 PM

Lotteries are just another way to tax those naive enough to want to pay more taxes.

Ocean's Edge 05-18-2013 04:55 PM

and stock brokers are just bookies in better suits
and insurance companies are just glorified casinos...

everything in life is a gamble in one way or another - at least it's voluntary

ZenGum 05-18-2013 06:43 PM

As an investment, lotteries deliver negative return.

As a form of consumption, they entitle you to have daydreams about suddenly becoming really rich.

Sundae 05-19-2013 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by richlevy (Post 865471)
Well, I did give you all of the luck from that penny I found (heads side up). Considering that the universe already owes you some good luck, that should put you over the top.

Good times are coming.

Thanks hon! In truth good times are already here when someone is kind enough to call me and give me their luck.
Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 865482)
As a form of consumption, they entitle you to have daydreams about suddenly becoming really rich.

You're right. And it's better to spend £2 on daydreams than two cans of cider.

ZenGum 05-30-2013 03:15 AM

In its entirety from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-3...-visit/4723132

Quote:

For the second time in a month, a sandwich has been thrown towards the Prime Minister during a visit to a school.

A salami sandwich was launched towards Julia Gillard as she visited the Lyneham High School in Canberra this morning.

Ms Gillard was visiting the school to announce that the ACT had decided to sign up to the Government's Gonski education reforms.

Ms Gillard has laughed the incident off, saying the student who threw the sandwich must have thought she was hungry.

Earlier this month, a student in Brisbane was suspended when he was blamed for throwing a vegemite sandwich at the Prime Minister.

The ACT Education and Training Directorate says the school is currently looking into today's incident and is speaking to the student involved.
How can it be wrong to throw a vegemite sanger at the PM? That should be a constitutional right!

No-one is at all worked up about this. Being disrespectful to authority figures is a national tradition.

glatt 05-30-2013 07:43 AM

That's awesome. I love you Aussies.

footfootfoot 05-30-2013 12:18 PM

So is Julia the antipodal analogue of Thatcher?

Lamplighter 05-31-2013 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamplighter (Post 831824)
Maybe this belongs in the "You know you are old" thread
... but I find this completely weird and insane.
California Legalizes Self-Driving Cars
<snip>

Today, this was in the PC World...

US road safety agency issues policy on driverless cars
Quote:

Self-driving vehicle technology is not yet at a stage that
it can be authorized for use by the public for general driving,
according to a U.S. Department of Transportation recommendation to state governments.

If a state decides to permit operation of self-driving vehicles other than for testing,
at a minimum it should require that a person licensed to drive self-driving vehicles
should be seated in the driver's seat, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
said in a preliminary statement of policy on automated vehicles released Thursday.

The licensed driver should "be available at all times in order to operate
the vehicle in situations in which the automated technology is not able
to safely control the vehicle," it said.

<snip>
As they did when the first automobiles were introduced to the horse-drawn carriage age,
they should also require an adult on-foot carrying a red flag and a lighted lantern
to precede each driver-less car at all times.

.

tw 05-31-2013 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamplighter (Post 866591)
... they should also require an adult on-foot carrying a red flag and a lighted lantern to precede each driver-less car at all times.

Meanwhile, over the past decade, Google already has driven these automated cars for almost one-half million miles. But only in states that permit innovation and the creation of jobs - CA, NV, and FL.

DARPA's Grand Challenge in 2004 and 2007 should be known to all. Since (if I recall) a Federal law required half the military convoy type vehicles to be autonomous long before 2020.

Lamplighter 05-31-2013 10:39 AM

My latest post above was a feeble attempt at humor. But more to the point...

How many times do drivers demonstrate their intent or courtesy
by interior hand-signals to another driver ? e.g., "you go first"
It's one of the reasons cited for not allowing darkened front windshields.

If a "licensed person" is required to be in the driver's seat and ready to take over.
What's the point of a driver-less car ?

For free-way driving, maybe... and especially on long, uninterrupted trips.
But as someone who thinks some basic decisions were wrong back
when we allowed train transportation to wither in favor of cross-country trucking,
I think car+passenger transport trains running on tracks along side our existing freeways
would be more economical, faster and safer than Google/GM/etc's driver-less cars "just because they can".

ETA: The insurance companies will have a ball figuring out who
is responsible, and who will pay, for accidents that are bound to happen
Alert to Programing Engineers: Get your liability insurance now.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.