The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=21150)

Urbane Guerrilla 10-09-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pie (Post 600054)
I don't doubt that Mr. Obama will accomplish many things, but has he done so yet?

Given the kind of accomplishments he's after making, he shouldn't. That will serve the Republic well. What he wants will not.

TheMercenary 10-09-2009 05:54 PM

I would have loved to see Pete Seeger get the award. He did a huge environmental clean-up along the Hudson River, among other things and for being a great musician.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloop_Clearwater

ZenGum 10-09-2009 06:18 PM

All this talk about "Obama hasn't achieved anything".

Well what has Aung San Suu Kyi achieved? SFA. Sat at home on her ass all the time, not even in a real prison like Mandela.

Sharon/Arafat? Oh sure, there's peace a plenty in the Middle East. Not.

The ILO? There are still sweatshops and slaves today.

Actually achieving stuff does not seem to be a requirement. Making the world feel warm and fuzzy is the thing, I think.

Shawnee123 10-09-2009 06:48 PM

All we are saying, is give peace a chance.

:lol:

I just love watching people writhe. Now you know how we felt for 8 years.

Cloud 10-09-2009 06:49 PM

He has given a lot of people in the world hope that there's someone in charge thinking with their brain, not their gonads, when it comes to peace. That is quite an accomplishment.

TheMercenary 10-09-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 600184)
I just love watching people writhe. Now you know how we felt for 8 years.

I really doubt people are "writhing", I mean really. We could have done much worse if McCain were elected.

Shawnee123 10-09-2009 06:58 PM

Well, if anyone would bother to read what I posted about the intent of the award, there would be so much less gnashing of teeth.

The award has been called meaningless. Fine. I'm not arguing that. What I am arguing is, if it's so meaningless, why are people so pissed off?

Huckabee reminded his constituents that to bitch about this would only make them look petty. Why stop now? He said it would be better to ask what Obama has done? Fair enough...until you actually pay attention to what the award is supposed to be about. Do I think it means much? Well, I believe in ideals, and what could be accomplished if we set our minds to it. I think this bestowment paves the way for honoring better ideas about what could really happen, if everyone wasn't so worried about someone else pissing in their spot. Arf.

TheMercenary 10-09-2009 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 600192)
Well, if anyone would bother to read what I posted about the intent of the award, there would be so much less gnashing of teeth.

The award has been called meaningless. Fine. I'm not arguing that. What I am arguing is, if it's so meaningless, why are people so pissed off?

Because now it is much more meaningless. :D

richlevy 10-09-2009 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 600166)
Given the kind of accomplishments he's after making, he shouldn't. That will serve the Republic well. What he wants will not.

Ooooh, a thumbs down from UG. Now I know he deserves it.:D

Seriously, I think it's way too soon. Obama had the same advantage an average looking girl does going to the beach with her ugly best friend - people automatically think shes prettier than they would if she were alone.

Following the Bush/Cheney act, all Obama had to do was show that he could tie his shoelaces and chew gum at the same time.

Shawnee123 10-09-2009 07:18 PM

Americans are so egocentric.

Shawnee123 10-09-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 600193)
Because now it is much more meaningless. :D

I don't agree.

Please list all the recipients (easily googled) and explain to me the meaning of each. In triplicate.

jinx 10-09-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nobel's will
The whole of my remaining realizable estate shall be dealt with in the following way:
The capital shall be invested by my executors in safe securities and shall constitute a fund, the interest on which shall be annually distributed in the form of prizes to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind. The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the person who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work of an idealistic tendency; and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity among nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.

:eyebrow:

TheMercenary 10-09-2009 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 600200)
I don't agree.

Please list all the recipients (easily googled) and explain to me the meaning of each. In triplicate.

The thing speaks for itself. No need for all that work.

classicman 10-10-2009 07:04 AM

He was in office for a whole two weeks when he was nominated.:eyebrow:

Still better him than, say Ahmajinedad. :eek:

wolf 10-10-2009 07:12 AM

During all of the chaos involving momwolf, this is the one news story that I heard yesterday.

Well, that and Archbishop Dougherty and Northeast Catholic closing.

I had to check my calendar to make sure that it was October 9th, not April 1st.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.