Good a place as any to slap a commie around like a hockey puck. They've got a hell of a lot to answer for; let them be pilloried until vultures come pluck out their eyes and livers.

UG...are you giving yourself a boner? ;)

What, to fuck the commies with? Or if commies are on one's Won't-Bang List, perhaps one should get them to autosodomize and then nail their pricks permanently into that orifice with sixteen-penny nails.

wow. I mean that, just wow.

And yet again I find myself wondering.....is UG really the person he presents on here? Or is he just a parody, well and consistently played?

UG is still fighting the Cold War. That post must be a quote from some comic book character. Maybe Sgt Rock in Korea?

Naw, he is a real person. With the experience to back it up. Your credentials are????

I would imagine most of us have the experience to back up being a real person.

What a shitload of biologically toxic waste reasoning complete with speculation based in wacko right wing 'screw all women' reasoning.

Experience without fundamental knowledge makes one his own worst enemy. Urbane Guerrilla's experience? He was an expert on Vietnam and yet he never even read nor understood facts in The Pentagon Papers.

Experience found in his posts is about as credible as TheMercenary's posts on military matters. Fully based in a political agenda while devoid even of basic knowledge of a high school education.

UG's posts based in insufficient knowledge and his biased political agenda are demonstrated by another stunning example: Then he discovered either how complex Thomas Barnett's book was or discovered that Barnett completely invalidated UG's political agenda. Either way, he could not read it until challenged. Well its been 9 month now since he so politely responded to a request for that discussion - and still no discussion.

Where is his credibility? At minimum, his posts only lied to us with contempt. However, I suspect his post's credibility lie in a political agenda where routinely rewriting history justifies his beliefs. I have suggested this often in response to inaccuracies in UG posts complete with pontiff tone. UG's posts continue to demonstrate the validity of my premise.

Serving as a soldier never justified support for the troops. Credibility in those posts so tarnished as to repeatedly advocate contempt for the troops - especially by advocating and defending "Mission Accomplished"- a war that even violates numerous and fundamentally simple military science 101 principles.

At no time does this discredit the integrity of UG. According to UT, anything that demonstrates his conclusions as excrement is neither an attack on UG nor insulting. The fact that his posts are often exposed as lies says nothing about UG; just exposes the credibility of everything in his posts. UG's posts simply expose a repeated lack of intelligent grasp complete with outright contempt for the American soldier by advocating their massacre. Meanwhile UG is a nice guy. Nothing here insults his intelligence - only the pompous, naive arrogance found in his pathetically 'poorly worded' posts. Some of those posts even beg for anal intercourse. But again, that says nothing about UG the person. It simply replies to the questionable validity of everything he posts - implies nothing about a penile nature in his character - which clearly does not exist.

UT - this is perfectly acceptable posting based upon your standards for civil and acceptable behavior defined in Violent crime up again in USA, more murders, robberies . Only UG's posts and the integrity of TheMercenary's clearly discredited, biased, unreasonable, and insulting posts are discussed. This new tone for the Cellar is refreshing? Screw the motherfucking posts from TheMercenary. Those diarrhea profusion posts represent simplistic 'pedophile like' agendas based in conclusions of mental infortitude. But TheMercenary is a nice guy.

Hah... I love it. tw fails in the argument and resorts to personal attacks. Hello Kettle!:)

Nor has tw ever proven me wrong -- he has alleged I'm wrong, up down and sideways. What he has demonstrated, proven that is, is persistent, obdurate delusive thinking. Allegation, for him, suffices. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy, and weak of reasoning. Somehow, someday, he's going to get different results from trying the same old thing, over and over.

So and meanwhile, we can expect tw to continue to act like tw: in a couple of adjectives, both immature and anti-American. Direct question to you, tw: Do you want the United States to win? Your entire history of posting for as long as I've been here says No, and in boldface.

And tw does not have credentials in this field. (He's just missed an excellent opportunity to recite some. I doubt he will fill the lack.) He's never even served in the military, and has said so. Nor will someone of tw's temperament be any good at politics in any case, which leaves him in even worse case. But this incapacity does not stop this would-be pundit from shooting his mouth off. Thus, not only is contempt the response called for, it is a perfectly true and applicable response. What you say, tw, is what makes us despise you -- and any of the friends you don't have the people skill to make -- there's never evidence of any healthy adult relationships in your postings. There are not even hints. The man who cannot connect cannot do politics.

So. The only people qualified to hold an opinion, make comment , or take a stance on the war are those who have served in the military or in the field of politics?

Again you make assumptions about tw's capacity to form relationships. This stuff is really, really boring and unpleasant. It was funny at first, watching you go off on a rant. Watching tw go off on a rant too. But this is just getting pathetic. Your posts are much more interesting, UG, when you are arguing a political point than when you are playing out a personal feud on the boards.

I took UG's posts to be fairly amusing and I think he realized that and played up for the camera so to speak.

I can't imagine anyone took those particular posts seriously...did they?

I don't take it seriously. I think its a rant and taken in isolation probably funny. I just think the joke's getting tired.

Well maybe so. But I guess I don't take anything UG says very seriously, so I look forward to the times he decides to put on a show. ;)

I always considered a UG type as the missing color in a Pat Paulson for President campaign. It would have been the political contrast that Pat need for his platform - the absurdity of politics.