richlevy |
05-15-2005 08:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie
Wow, tw, I had no idea that North Korea was so misunderstood.
|
No, but it does show the unintended consequences of politics and government.
If Nixon had taken a hardline stance towards China, would the world be better off?
The US embargo of oil to Japan is cited as one of the provocations for the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, the Iraq oil for food program shows that corruption is one of the results of attempts at humanitarian relief.
All I can say is that I don't have any good answers. But all of this shows that diplomacy is a minefield mixing human emotions with the possibility of devastating outcomes affecting millions of lives. A 'beat on it with a stick' approach is generally not good. Whether the results are tens of thousands starving to death, or some 19-year-old kid from Ohio dying on a street during a military operation, there are consequences for almost every action.
One thing never changes in politics, the people making the decisions are very rarely the ones who bear the brunt of the suffering from their failures.
Personally, I am not a big fan of the 'starve them to make them free' approach.
|