The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Osama Bin Laden is Dead!!! (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=25119)

Uday 05-04-2011 05:32 PM

Incidentally:

And if all that doesn’t convince the Cheney family, father and daughter, try Ethics 101. The ends do not justify the means.
Mohammed did not reveal the names while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former officials said. He identified them many months later under standard interrogation, they said, leaving it once again up for debate as to whether the harsh technique was a valuable tool or an unnecessarily violent tactic.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...H9mF_blog.html

TheMercenary 05-04-2011 05:56 PM

Obama is really not dead.

I hope you all realize this is nothing more than ruse by Obama to get re-elected and they photoshoped everything. You fools believed him.

infinite monkey 05-04-2011 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 730655)
Obama is really not dead.

I hope you all realize this is nothing more than ruse by Obama to get re-elected and they photoshoped everything. You fools believed him.

Obama killed himself to get re-elected? Oh NOES. :eek:

TheMercenary 05-04-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infinite monkey (Post 730658)
Obama killed himself to get re-elected? Oh NOES. :eek:

Cool! I will vote for him! I mean over obamy!

Uday 05-04-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 730655)
Obama is really not dead.

He wasn't as of ten minutes ago. He is still the president of the United States.

TheMercenary 05-04-2011 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 730662)
He wasn't as of ten minutes ago. He is still the president of the United States.

No, Osama is now in charge. You must obey.

DanaC 05-04-2011 06:04 PM

Merc's been at the wacky baccy.

Trilby 05-04-2011 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 730669)
Merc's been at the wacky baccy.

Why do you think they call it 'dope' -?

Sheldonrs 05-04-2011 09:28 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The situation room gets crazy after the confirmation:

TheMercenary 05-04-2011 09:46 PM

Dude, what? we need to get out a magnifying glass to see that!

Aliantha 05-04-2011 09:52 PM

Yeah, I've gotta say, it's all just blur to me.

[old fart]Let me get my glasses sonny...[/old fart]

plthijinx 05-04-2011 09:53 PM

isn't that the same as this only minus the character names?

Nirvana 05-04-2011 10:14 PM

They are all wearing the Princess Beatrice hat :lol: Yah I can see mini

plthijinx 05-04-2011 10:19 PM

ahhh now that you mention it!

TheMercenary 05-04-2011 11:05 PM

Where do I get one???!!?!

Or can I just get a piece of Pippa?

dmg1969 05-05-2011 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 730631)
If that is what you want your country to be, far be it from me to get in the way.

What I WANT is the ability to use unconventional methods to break these people and have them give up information which can potentially save thousands of lives!

I don't consider the techniques that I have heard used (making someone stand for many hours at a time, sleep deprivation or threatening their families with death) torture in the classic sense. And while waterboarding (simulated drowning) may be terrifying to the person on the receiving end, these methods are designed to not cause permanent physical injury. These methods are MAINLY psychological in nature.

Are you saying that you would be against these methods being used if they stopped another 9-11 here or in another country?

DanaC 05-05-2011 06:59 AM

Sleep deprivation is not mainly psychological in nature. It can cause serious physiological damage.

dmg1969 05-05-2011 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 730635)
Incidentally:

And if all that doesn’t convince the Cheney family, father and daughter, try Ethics 101. The ends do not justify the means.
Mohammed did not reveal the names while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former officials said. He identified them many months later under standard interrogation, they said, leaving it once again up for debate as to whether the harsh technique was a valuable tool or an unnecessarily violent tactic.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...H9mF_blog.html

And who is to say that he WOULD have given up the names using on standard interrogation methods? :eyebrow:

dmg1969 05-05-2011 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 730977)
Sleep deprivation is not mainly psychological in nature. It can cause serious physiological damage.

As if someone who is willing to strap a bomb to themselves and blow themselves up to kill you and I isn't already seriously psychologically damaged?

Misread that. I see you said physiological. My opinion remains. If it provides information which prevents you or I from getting killed, I'm good with it. It's a far cry from shoving bamboo shoots under their fingernails, cutting off fingers or burning them with red hot knife blades. Again, we're not dealing with people with the same thought process as you and I. Your chances of getting information from them using standard techniques (especially high value detainees) are almost nil.

One final addition is that the physiological effects of sleep deprivation appear to be from LONG term deprivation...not short term.

DanaC 05-05-2011 07:12 AM

From what i read (there's a link somewhere around here) the information was not given up during that 'enhanced' interrogation. It was given up much later under normal interrogation techniques.


As to whether or not it's worth it if it prevents more terrorist attacks, that relies rather heavily on the idea that the person being tortured has any information to give up. I have serious doubts as to the terrorist credentials of most of the people who passed through Guantanamo's gates. Several of my countrymen were captured and tortured, sorry no interrogated with the above methods, seemingly on very little (read no) evidence.

dmg1969 05-05-2011 07:25 AM

I highly doubt that every detainee in Gitmo was waterboarded...only those deemed to likely have valuable information. No justice system is perfect. I'm sure there are people in Gitmo who shouldn't be, but that is true of any prison anywhere is the world.

I have to believe Rep. King when he says that KSM revealed information on the courier who ultimately led us to bin Laden's doorstep. And I'm fine with that. We agree to disagree. It's all good.

DanaC 05-05-2011 08:10 AM

I think the difference between Gitmo and 'any prison anywhere in the world' is that most of those in other prisons have been convicted of a crime.

dmg1969 05-05-2011 08:16 AM

Agreed, but you can't lump enemy combatants in the same category as civilian criminals. We can't arrest them, have them pay bail and promise to show up for court. Anyone in Gitmo is not there for mugging an old lady or shoplifting...they have direct or indirect ties to terrorism.

DanaC 05-05-2011 08:29 AM

Some of them weren't combatants. Their connection to terrorism may just be geographical proximity to the areas where battles were fought.

classicman 05-05-2011 09:32 AM

This morning on MSNBC they reported that the three men who were killed were NOT armed.
Then this from The WSJ -
Quote:

The Pakistani official said bin Laden's 12-year-old daughter, who is among those in Pakistani custody,
told authorities the Americans took two people when they left, including bin Laden.
U.S. officials say bin Laden's body was the only one removed from the scene.
From armed, to human shields, to some undefined resistance, to this...
I am really confused as to why any info was given in the first place and why the story from the Admin keeps changing.

Spexxvet 05-05-2011 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 730979)
If it provides information which prevents you or I from getting killed, I'm good with it.

The CIA has a tip that your mom has information that will prevent you or me from getting killed. The information might not be accurate, but they have to waterboard her, just to make sure.

infinite monkey 05-05-2011 10:13 AM

A Q-tip? My mom always has Q-tips.

dmg1969 05-05-2011 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 731039)
The CIA has a tip that your mom has information that will prevent you or me from getting killed. The information might not be accurate, but they have to waterboard her, just to make sure.

Oh please, you act like they just grab random people off the street and waterboard them to see if they know anything. While I am not saying that a few innocent people may have been caught up in it, the vast majority are there for a reason. And by the way, my Mom doesn't travel to the middle-east or hang around known or suspected terrorists so I think she's safe. I'll be sure to ask her on Sunday when I see her for Mother's Day...just to be sure. ;)

Nirvana 05-05-2011 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infinite monkey (Post 731040)
A Q-tip? My mom always has Q-tips.

Just don't stick them in your ear...:)

like no one does that:rolleyes:

tw 05-05-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 730978)
And who is to say that he WOULD have given up the names using on standard interrogation methods?

How many times must examples be repeated before learning starts? Greatest intelligence that resulted in complete destruction of entire terrorist networks meant, first, keeping Americans away (because Americans and Nazis torture). And second, taking the prisoner out even for fine dinners.

Go back and read the so many descriptions of how terrorist networks were so successfully destroyed. No torture. Search the Cellar for the term Jemaah Islamiya.

Or from the Washington Post entitled "Fort Hunt's Quiet Men Break Silence on WWII
Interrogators Fought 'Battle of Wits'":
Quote:

For six decades, they held their silence.

The group of World War II veterans kept a military code and the decorum of their generation, telling virtually no one of their top-secret work interrogating Nazi prisoners of war at Fort Hunt.

When about two dozen veterans got together yesterday for the first time since the 1940s, many of the proud men lamented the chasm between the way they conducted interrogations during the war and the harsh measures used today in questioning terrorism suspects.

Back then, they and their commanders wrestled with the morality of bugging prisoners' cells with listening devices. They felt bad about censoring letters. They took prisoners out for steak dinners to soften them up. They played games with them.

"We got more information out of a German general with a game of chess or Ping-Pong than they do today, with their torture," said Henry Kolm, 90, an MIT physicist who had been assigned to play chess in Germany with Hitler's deputy, Rudolf Hess. ...

Several of the veterans, all men in their 80s and 90s, denounced the controversial techniques. And when the time came for them to accept honors from the Army's Freedom Team Salute, one veteran refused, citing his opposition to the war in Iraq and procedures that have been used at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.

"I feel like the military is using us to say, 'We did spooky stuff then, so it's okay to do it now,' " said Arno Mayer, 81, a professor of European history at Princeton University.

When Peter Weiss, 82, went up to receive his award, he commandeered the microphone and gave his piece.

"I am deeply honored to be here, but I want to make it clear that my presence here is not in support of the current war," said Weiss, chairman of the Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy and a human rights and trademark lawyer in New York City.

The veterans of P.O. Box 1142, a top-secret installation in Fairfax County that went only by its postal code name, were brought back to Fort Hunt by park rangers who are piecing together a portrait of what happened there during the war.

Nearly 4,000 prisoners of war, most of them German scientists and submariners, were brought in for questioning for days, even weeks, before their presence was reported to the Red Cross, a process that did not comply with the Geneva Conventions. Many of the interrogators were refugees from the Third Reich.

"We did it with a certain amount of respect and justice," said John Gunther Dean, 81, who became a career Foreign Service officer and ambassador to Denmark.

The interrogators had standards that remain a source of pride and honor.

"During the many interrogations, I never laid hands on anyone," said George Frenkel, 87, of Kensington. "We extracted information in a battle of the wits. I'm proud to say I never compromised my humanity."

Exactly what went on behind the barbed-wire fences of Fort Hunt has been a mystery that has lured amateur historians and curious neighbors for decades.

During the war, nearby residents watched buses with darkened windows roar toward the fort day and night. They couldn't have imagined that groundbreaking secrets in rocketry, microwave technology and submarine tactics were being peeled apart right on the grounds that are now a popular picnic area where moonbounces mushroom every weekend.

When Vincent Santucci arrived at the National Park Service's George Washington Memorial Parkway office as chief ranger four years ago, he asked his cultural resource specialist, Brandon Bies, to do some research so they could post signs throughout the park, explaining its history and giving it a bit more dignity.

That assignment changed dramatically when ranger Dana Dierkes was leading a tour of the park one day and someone told her about a rumored Fort Hunt veteran.

It was Fred Michel, who worked in engineering in Alexandria for 65 years, never telling his neighbors that he once faced off with prisoners and pried wartime secrets from them.

Michel directed them to other vets, and they remembered others.

Bies went from being a ranger researching mountains of topics in stacks of papers to flying across the country, camera and klieg lights in tow, to document the fading memories of veterans.

He, Santucci and others have spent hours trying to sharpen the focus of gauzy memories, coaxing complex details from men who swore on their generation's honor to never speak of the work they did at P.O. Box 1142. ...

By gathering at Fort Hunt yesterday, the quiet men could be saluted for the work they did so long ago.
Torture works only because those who 'feel' therefore know it must work. The term junk science reasoning applies.

Because he was tortured, investigators had to spend the next ten years sorting through every word to find the only word that was truthful. That is what torture does. Mask information that could be obtained without torture into reams of lies and myths.
In but a year (long after the WTC came down and long before bin Laden was finally found), the other terrorist network was completely destroyed. Because they did not torture anyone. They also used fine dinners to extract far more useful information.

infinite monkey 05-05-2011 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nirvana (Post 731051)
Just don't stick them in your ear...:)

like no one does that:rolleyes:

Eargasm! :p:

plthijinx 05-05-2011 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infinite monkey (Post 731057)
Eargasm! :p:

so earwax is essentially the cum of the ear?? :rolleyes:

glatt 05-05-2011 11:38 AM

1 Attachment(s)
A bigger version of that Princess's hat picture.

I'm actually really impressed with this. Whoever did this took the time to collect several different pictures of the hat so they could put it correctly on everyone's head, according to the angle in relation to the camera.

DanaC 05-05-2011 11:42 AM

http://www.tom-baker.co.uk/assets_cm...ssin_445px.jpg

infinite monkey 05-05-2011 12:10 PM

Ali, I thought you would love this video. Not everyone is dancing in the streets, that's for sure. This kid looks like a downright noodge! As I mentioned yesterday, I've heard nary a word on this campus. Takes all kinds. ;)

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/off...ant.cnn?hpt=T2

Aliantha 05-05-2011 05:53 PM

I got a video about possible rail attacks on the anniversary of 9/11. Not sure if that's what you were directing me to.

Uday 05-05-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 730976)
What I WANT is the ability to use unconventional methods to break these people and have them give up information which can potentially save thousands of lives!

I don't consider the techniques that I have heard used (making someone stand for many hours at a time, sleep deprivation or threatening their families with death) torture in the classic sense. And while waterboarding (simulated drowning) may be terrifying to the person on the receiving end, these methods are designed to not cause permanent physical injury. These methods are MAINLY psychological in nature.

Are you saying that you would be against these methods being used if they stopped another 9-11 here or in another country?

Yes. Torture is inexcusable. Any civilization that would tolerate it is unworthy of the name. There are some prices for safety that are simply too high...Not because of what torture does to your enemy, but because of what it does to you.

It is impossible to both torture and to be the "good guy". You have to choose.

Uday 05-05-2011 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 730996)
Agreed, but you can't lump enemy combatants in the same category as civilian criminals. We can't arrest them, have them pay bail and promise to show up for court. Anyone in Gitmo is not there for mugging an old lady or shoplifting...they have direct or indirect ties to terrorism.

People are remanded without bail all the time. They still get trials.

lookout123 05-06-2011 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 731299)
It is impossible to both torture and to be the "good guy". You have to choose.

Some of us disagree with that on a theoretical level. Unfortunately most of us don't trust our government or "deciders" any further than we can throw them so... guess we're all screwed.

DanaC 05-06-2011 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 731299)
Yes. Torture is inexcusable. Any civilization that would tolerate it is unworthy of the name. There are some prices for safety that are simply too high...Not because of what torture does to your enemy, but because of what it does to you.

It is impossible to both torture and to be the "good guy". You have to choose.

Well said.

Trilby 05-06-2011 08:05 AM

Ditto RE: DanaC RE: Well said, Uday.

I think Bob Dylan said "Ya gotta serve somebody..."

Spexxvet 05-06-2011 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 731333)
Some of us disagree with that on a theoretical level. Unfortunately most of us don't trust our government or "deciders" any further than we can throw them so... guess we're all screwed.

You forfeit the privilage to complain when our citizens are tortured up to and including the "theoretical level" of torture that you choose to be acceptable for our enemy. If you think waterboarding an AQ operative is acceptable, you can't complain when dmg's mom or General Petraeus is waterboarded.

dmg1969 05-06-2011 08:23 AM

Let me, once again, remind you of what happens when radical Islamists are finished interrogating you...

http://www.veteransforacademicfreedo...ng-300x230.jpg

Waterboarding and sleep deprivation don't seem so bad now, do they?

piercehawkeye45 05-06-2011 10:10 AM

I don't see how that is a valid point dmg? Here is a good article that I feel lays down some very good points against torture.

Quote:

In fact, the information about the existence of a courier working for bin Laden was provided by several detainees, not just waterboarded al Qaeda operatives Kalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Faraj al-Libi -- we had one detainee in Iraq who provided information about a courier in 2006. The key pieces of information, however, were the courier's real name and location. His family name was first uncovered by CIA assets in Pakistan through other sources. The NSA subsequently figured out his full real name and location from an intercepted phone call. Waterboarding had nothing to do with it.

........

Understanding these cultural nuances is just one critical skill interrogators must have to be effective. The other is an understanding of the social science behind interrogations, which tells us that torture has an extremely negative effect on memory. An interrogator needs timely and accurate intelligence information, not just made-up babble.

What torture has proven is exactly what experienced interrogators have said all along: First, when tortured, detainees will give only the minimum amount of information necessary to stop the pain. No interrogator should ever be hoping to extract the least amount of information. Second, under coercion, detainees give misleading information that wastes time and resources -- a false nickname, for example. Finally, it's impossible to know what information the detainee would have disclosed under non-coercive interrogations.

.....

the fact that torture handed al Qaeda its No. 1 recruiting tool, a fact confirmed by the U.S. Department of Defense's interrogators in Iraq who questioned foreign fighters about why they had come there to fight. (I have first-hand knowledge of this information because I oversaw many of these interrogations and was briefed on the aggregate results.) In addition, future detainees will be unwilling to cooperate from the onset of an interrogation because they view all Americans as torturers. I heard this repeatedly in Iraq, where some detainees accused us of being the same as the guards at Abu Ghraib.

The more you think about, the less sense torture makes. U.S. allies will become unwilling to conduct joint operations if they are concerned about how detainees will be treated in U.S. custody (an argument made by the 9/11 Commission, among others). And future enemies will use our actions as justification to torture American captives. Torture also lowers our ethical standards to those of our enemies, an ugly shift that spreads like a virus throughout the Armed Services; witness the abuses of Abu Ghraib or the recent murders of civilians in Afghanistan.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...logic?page=0,0

Spexxvet 05-06-2011 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 731378)
Let me, once again, remind you of what happens when radical Islamists are finished interrogating you...

http://www.veteransforacademicfreedo...ng-300x230.jpg

Waterboarding and sleep deprivation don't seem so bad now, do they?

When you compare it to what the dredges of humanity do, hacking off hands and feet don't seem so bad, either, now do they?

We're supposed to be the good guys. We're not supposed to torture. That's what makes the bad guys bad.

dmg1969 05-06-2011 12:04 PM

From an article in The Washington Post titled "How a Detainee Became an Asset"...

"These scenes provide previously unpublicized details about the transformation of the man known to U.S. officials as KSM from an avowed and truculent enemy of the United States into what the CIA called its "preeminent source" on al-Qaeda. This reversal occurred after Mohammed was subjected to simulated drowning and prolonged sleep deprivation, among other harsh interrogation techniques. "

"KSM, an accomplished resistor, provided only a few intelligence reports prior to the use of the waterboard, and analysis of that information revealed that much of it was outdated, inaccurate or incomplete," according to newly unclassified portions of a 2004 report by the CIA's then-inspector general released Monday by the Justice Department."

Link to the entire artcle:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...T2009082804015

tw 05-06-2011 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 731471)
From an article in The Washington Post titled "How a Detainee Became an Asset"...

Information was so good that it took almost ten years to understand it? Of course not. Posted was a half story. Reality was so buried in myths and lies as to be all but useless. It took almost ten years and tens of millions of dollars to separate reality from the lies. Meanwhile, those who did not use torture had truth in less than one year - often in less than one month. Fine dinners more effective at extracting truths. A reality that cannot be understood when feelings replace facts and experience.

Zero reasons prove nothing useful from torture. Torture only muddies the waters. Torture makes finding truth nearly impossible. It took almost ten years to finally filter out reality because some idiot used torture.

Fine dinners do more to extract the truth. But that contradicts what a TV show called "24" taught our current flock of 'experts'.

Uday 05-06-2011 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmg1969 (Post 731378)
Let me, once again, remind you of what happens when radical Islamists are finished interrogating you...

http://www.veteransforacademicfreedo...ng-300x230.jpg

Waterboarding and sleep deprivation don't seem so bad now, do they?

Yes. The bad actions of fanatics do not excuse anyone else's bad actions. Also, are you certain you wish to base your moral code by relating it to the actions of criminals?

dmg1969 05-09-2011 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uday (Post 731766)
Yes. The bad actions of fanatics do not excuse anyone else's bad actions. Also, are you certain you wish to base your moral code by relating it to the actions of criminals?

That's part of the whole problem...you view them as criminals. They are not criminals, they are TERRORISTS. The guy who steals your car is a criminal. The guy who flies planes into buildings killing thousands is a terrorist. No wonder some of you want them tired in "criminal" courts as opposed to military tribunals.

I won't change your mind and you won't change mine, so we will agree to disagree on this one.

Hey, at least I give Obama props for getting the guy. That's something. :D

dmg1969 05-09-2011 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 731754)
Information was so good that it took almost ten years to understand it? Of course not. Posted was a half story. Reality was so buried in myths and lies as to be all but useless. It took almost ten years and tens of millions of dollars to separate reality from the lies. Meanwhile, those who did not use torture had truth in less than one year - often in less than one month. Fine dinners more effective at extracting truths. A reality that cannot be understood when feelings replace facts and experience.

Zero reasons prove nothing useful from torture. Torture only muddies the waters. Torture makes finding truth nearly impossible. It took almost ten years to finally filter out reality because some idiot used torture.

Fine dinners do more to extract the truth. But that contradicts what a TV show called "24" taught our current flock of 'experts'.

Fine dining? Will there be candlelight? Soft music? Black tie? That has to be one of the funniest (and most ridiculous) things I have ever heard. Sure, it might have worked in WWII, but I'm sure most of those prisoners would have rathered live. Those we are battling today would rather die. You are dealing with an entirely different mentality.

And I have never watched 24.

DanaC 05-09-2011 06:33 AM

There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that torture is the least effective way of gathering information. The information gathered under toture is the minimum needed to stop the pain; the informant is not clear headed and therefore the information is prone to inaccuracy; prisoners who believe themselves beloved of God become more entrenched and unwilling.

'Enhanced interrogation' has been used in some instances, but the useful information gathered from prisoners has generally been through theuse of ordinary interrogation techniques. Added to that there are several prominent cases of individuals who have been subjected to normal interrogation techniques actually changing their minds and begun to work for their captors, against their former groups. Several such figures have become active in the fight against extremism within universities and the like, performing outreach with youths who are believed to be vulnerable to extremist propoganda.

Now, there may be odd cases where information given up during waterboarding or sleep deprivation turns out to be genuine and useful. But there is no way to know whether they'd have given more information through ordinary techniques. There is good evidence however to suggest that clever interrogators get more and better information than brutal interrogators.

So, whilst waterboarding may well get you a name, a long and well-crafted standard interrogation may well get you more. And has the added benefit of possibly breaking through the brainwashing and turning one of them. Then you really do have a useful informant.

Quite aside from the moral dimension, it is the least effective way of information gathering.

sexobon 05-09-2011 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by General Stall

Words are the weapons of women folk.
Designer drugs are the way to go: better informants through modern chemistry!

DanaC 05-09-2011 08:28 AM

*coughs*Staal*coughs*

infinite monkey 05-09-2011 08:29 AM

Wait...what? Bin Laden is dead? When the hell did this happen? :confused:

DanaC 05-09-2011 08:43 AM

The Sontarans got him.

infinite monkey 05-09-2011 08:44 AM

The who?

DanaC 05-09-2011 08:46 AM

No, the Sontarans.


(sorry. Couldn't help that pun. They're a villain in Who)

infinite monkey 05-09-2011 08:47 AM

I can't resist puns. When I googled Sonatrans I saw it was a Dr Who thing...hence my "the who?"

:)

DanaC 05-09-2011 09:41 AM

ahhhhh


You outpunned me.


I feel I have shamed my nation.

infinite monkey 05-09-2011 09:44 AM

It's not your fault. My mom got me this book when I was in HS. ;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.