Closing Gitmo and moving them onto US soil are two VERY different situations and, I believe, have very different legal ramifications.

Hey! Where did that ^^^^ smiley come from?

That's strange, I tried the "quote" button, and the "edit" button, and the smilie doesn't show up in either.
It must be Jesus in shades!

someone must have slipped the cellar a lil some somethin'

You have to Edit and then Go Advanced and it's the Post Icon below the edit box.

Thanks, I must have hit it accidentally.

A twenty five minute discussion of a US military guard in Guantanamo and two of the first prisioners held there.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p005trqp

Supposedly Saudi Arabia has a rehabilitation center for gitmo victims and it has a 80% rate of getting gitmo detainees to live normal lives again. But unfortunately, many of the 20% have started their own terrorist group, AQAP, and took responsibility for the Christmas Day bombing...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Care_Rehabilitation_Center

define normal . . .

Not blowing up people....

http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/04/27/71553.html

Here's a PBS documentary video of the center
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/un...and-back/4180/

Newsnight did a really interesting piece about that last week.

There is proof enough we should have just shot them. Releasing them back into the wild is just begging for trouble.;)

Cause that would NEVER backfire.....

Not if you kill enough of them.

Not if you get two people to join the terrorist movement for every person you kill. But eh, you are looking for a reaction now.