![]() |
Quote:
And I'm not a dude. But try pulling yer head outcherass....'dude'. |
Quote:
|
Certainly. Your exact quote was "George Jr sat on his righteous ass - did nothing - for 5 days as people were dying." My link was a press conference held on day three which showed that he had done something on day two... announcing the creation of the "regional core group" of the US, Australia, Japan and India for the mobilization, on the basis of diplomatic work done on day two. And all of that is less than four hours old and is present in this very thread.
So, why your inaccuracy? |
Quote:
In the meantime, that coalition which I understood to be Japan, Australia, the US, and China was later disbanded because the UN could do a better job. In the meantime, what action did that coalition accomplish? Action - like stock the USS Kitty Hawk with supplies and helicopters. Like dispatch C-17s with so many single pallets of emergency aid for remote villages? Where was the action for 5 days while people were dying? Action like in get satellite pictures to the Indonesian Interior minister. Like ask the president of Sri Lanka what she needs on day one and get it to her. You cite a coalition that I understood broke up because it was unworkable. What action resulted from that coalition? |
On the same day as that conference, the Pentagon rolled out the biggest military relief project in history. Why your inaccuracy?
In the meantime, here's what the Financial Times says about the UN's response. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
It was a famous commerical - "Where's the Beef?" No significant action occurred for five days while George Jr thought about making a decision. Maybe he could not contact Cheney for five days? The Pentagon probably has rolled its biggest relief project in history - after George Jr stopped stifling the Pentagon for five days. Aid that should have been flowing on Sunday could not move because a lovable George Jr took five days to make a decision. Does the name Dan Quayle sound familiar? |
Quote:
|
This Telegraph article summarizes the tensions between the US and UN
Talking points on both sides in that article, but it's clear one side wants to act and one side wants to talk about acting. Guess which side is which. Quote:
|
Quote:
Dude. Until you respond and tell me what YOU personally have done, I'm just going to ignore your drivel for what it is. |
He won't answer that. Nor will he answer if he has ever been part of a relief effort, wither in the air or on the ground co-ordinating. Nor will he answer why Lookout is somehow responsible for GWB's actions. (I still can't figure that one out.) Nor will he apologize for his libel.
Because if he did, it just might prove he's talking directly out of his ass. |
That's pretty much what I figured, which is why I decided to just stop trying to be sensible.
Not enough hours in my day for the drama. |
I think tw has a secret man-crush on W.
|
Ohhhh...so HE's the 'man-date' eh?
|
:love: :lol:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Once George Jr made a decision, then massive aid started moving. It was always there waiting to be deployed. Within two days of being ordered into action, the USS Lincoln was on scene. Day after George Jr finally ordered a US government response, only then did a Marine reactionary force respond. On the day after George Jr finally made a decision, a convoy of ships with massive supplies left from Guam. These are all responses that sat stifled because the mental midget president could not make a decision. That fact remains completely unchallenged by Dagney. Dagney, if you are going to make a logical post, you must challenge the timeline. Where is this massive US response to a disaster in the first five days? Tens of thousands of lives probably could have been saved it something had arrived in the first three days. What did George Jr do? As UT demonstrates - he finally got on the phone on day three. That is 'moral' leadership - to let victims die? Please learn to post without your emotional outbursts. I can understand your problem. You have feelings that are not supported by any facts. Your only alternative is to attack the messenger. That does not make your case. You want to prove me wrong? Then provide facts. Show me where the thousands of US Government employees were moving to save lived in the first five days of the disaster. Show me where this president demonstrated leadership for five days? You cannot. Was he waiting for Cheney to tell him what to do? It does explain five days of indecision. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.