The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Obama's first failed appointment (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19164)

TGRR 03-02-2009 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 539176)
Well, that's different. Somehow.


sugarpop 03-02-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 540446)
Too late! NEXT! I'm fuckin sick to death of all the politicians who don't pay their taxes, yet expect us to do so. Fuck that.

Me too. I think, though (and this is not an excuse, it's an observation), that in the climate we've had for the past 8 years (more than 8 actually), with all the corruption everywhere, it would be more surprising to me to find anyone in politics who HADN'T cheated on their taxes (or who doesn't owe money).

And just because you have back taxes doesn't necessarily mean you cheated. It just means you didn't pay them. Is that wrong? YES, especially when you work in politics. I'm sick to death of all the greed and corruption in our society. But owing back taxes, there could be a reasonable explanation for that. I'm just saying...

classicman 03-02-2009 08:58 PM

I'm not interested in excuses anymore - These people need to be held to a HIGHER standard than the rest of us.

The IRS should investigate every single one of them. Starting at the top and going through the Senate and then the House, until every elected official has been done. Then they can work on the lobbyists and so on. The IRS needn't bother with the average American. I'm certain they will have more than enough to keep them busy with these guys till the next crop comes in in 2010 and 2012.

sugarpop 03-02-2009 09:06 PM

I think they should start with the lobbyists, and then go through the government.

classicman 03-02-2009 09:10 PM

How many of them are there? nah - Lets get the ones up for reelection first - start with them.

TheMercenary 03-02-2009 09:12 PM

We will never change the balance of power until we introduce a viable third party that can gain seats from the majority party and take away their overall majority in both houses.

classicman 03-02-2009 09:19 PM

2 of the 3 will go in cahoots and there will be no equality.

TheMercenary 03-02-2009 09:28 PM

Yes but that would force compromise agreements to be formed among uncommon thinkers. That might be refreshing.

sugarpop 03-02-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 540611)
How many of them are there? nah - Lets get the ones up for reelection first - start with them.

There are probably hundreds of them for each person in Congress. Let's start with them. hell, just do them at the same time.

sugarpop 03-02-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 540613)
We will never change the balance of power until we introduce a viable third party that can gain seats from the majority party and take away their overall majority in both houses.

HEAR, HEAR!

TGRR 03-02-2009 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 540613)
We will never change the balance of power until we introduce a viable third party that can gain seats from the majority party and take away their overall majority in both houses.

Not gonna happen, for a variety of reasons, the first of which is the fact that the people that fund the two major parties will crush a third party like a bug.

Why pay for three, when you only have to pay for two?

Also, any 3rd party that actually gained any power would be corrupted instantly, because the problem isn't with the parties, it's with the people.

sugarpop 03-03-2009 12:16 AM

It's with the way elections are run. I said this somewhere else, but we really to change that. No more lobbying, no more donations. Elections should be paid for from a public fund. They should last only about 4 months, so politicians actaully WORK instead of campaigning for the next election the moment they're in office. TV networks should give equal access to all politicians (commerical time), because the airwaves are owned by the people and should be for the benefit OF the people. No more smear commercials paid for by third parties or PACs. There should be weekly debates between ALL candidates for the 4 months prior to the election.

It's ridiculous how much campaigns cost nowadays, and it's ridiculous how campaigns and elections seem to be ongoing now. For crying out loud, they are already talking about (and asking people) who will be the next presidential nominations. Are you kidding me? We JUST had an election. The next one is almost 4 years away. WTF!?

TGRR 03-03-2009 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 540750)
It's with the way elections are run. I said this somewhere else, but we really to change that. No more lobbying, no more donations. Elections should be paid for from a public fund. They should last only about 4 months, so politicians actaully WORK instead of campaigning for the next election the moment they're in office. TV networks should give equal access to all politicians (commerical time), because the airwaves are owned by the people and should be for the benefit OF the people. No more smear commercials paid for by third parties or PACs. There should be weekly debates between ALL candidates for the 4 months prior to the election.

It's ridiculous how much campaigns cost nowadays, and it's ridiculous how campaigns and elections seem to be ongoing now. For crying out loud, they are already talking about (and asking people) who will be the next presidential nominations. Are you kidding me? We JUST had an election. The next one is almost 4 years away. WTF!?

Don't ask me, I'm just a troll, right?

classicman 03-03-2009 12:29 AM

rite

sugarpop 03-03-2009 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 540753)
Don't ask me, I'm just a troll, right?

Well, sometimes you do engage in troll-like behavior. Do you not know that?

tw 03-03-2009 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 540600)
The IRS should investigate every single one of them. Starting at the top and going through the Senate and then the House, until every elected official has been done.

But Senators and Congreemen don't do their own taxes. Another perk. The government does their taxes for them. Tax laws are too complex for Senators and Congressmen to comprehend. Irony and reality.

TheMercenary 03-03-2009 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 540661)
Not gonna happen, for a variety of reasons, the first of which is the fact that the people that fund the two major parties will crush a third party like a bug.

Why pay for three, when you only have to pay for two?

Also, any 3rd party that actually gained any power would be corrupted instantly, because the problem isn't with the parties, it's with the people.

Pure speculation on your part. You have little to back that up. It can be done if the people will it.

TGRR 03-03-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 540793)
Pure speculation on your part.

Possibly. I am a very avid student of monkey-ass pack behavior, though.

Also, history is on my side:

Quote:

Duverger's law — After Maurice Duverger. Winner-take-all (or first-past-the-post) electoral systems tend to create a 2 party system, while proportional representation tends to create a multiple party system.
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 540793)
You have little to back that up. It can be done if the people will it.

Okay. So will it.

See what I mean?

TGRR 03-03-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 540762)
Well, sometimes you do engage in troll-like behavior. Do you not know that?


I blame society.

And the drugs.

DanaC 03-03-2009 07:19 PM

and the boogie?

TheMercenary 03-03-2009 07:23 PM

I blame first Bush. Beause everybody blames him for everything.

Second Al Gore. If he never would have invented the internet or global warming we would never have gotten into this mess.

DanaC 03-03-2009 07:27 PM

I blame you. yes, you. It's all your fucking fault.

Aliantha 03-03-2009 07:29 PM

I thought it was Obamas fault?

TheMercenary 03-03-2009 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 541017)
I blame you. yes, you. It's all your fucking fault.

Ok. But it's not. It is the fault of Bush.

Oh, and Al.

And the Illuminati. Serious.

Aliantha 03-03-2009 07:36 PM

I think the little green men did it.

Or was it the mice?

TGRR 03-03-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 541008)
and the boogie?

ALWAYS!
\
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/fo...hammertime.gif

TGRR 03-03-2009 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 541014)
I blame first Bush. Beause everybody blames him for everything.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/fo...ault/balls.gif

TheMercenary 03-03-2009 07:47 PM

Cute, it fits you.

TGRR 03-03-2009 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 541030)
Cute, it fits you.

I have to have that done once in a while. It clears my sinuses.

TheMercenary 03-03-2009 08:48 PM

That would clear my adnenoids!

TGRR 03-03-2009 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 541054)
That would clear my adnenoids!

Them too. It's very theraputic.

I'm told it also adjusts your chakras, whatever the hell they are.

sugarpop 03-05-2009 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 541087)
Them too. It's very theraputic.

I'm told it also adjusts your chakras, whatever the hell they are.

Energy centers in the body.

Got some drugs?

TGRR 03-05-2009 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 541582)
Energy centers in the body.

Got some drugs?

Them I got. Sleepers, wakers, the whole 9 yards. Like Elvis. But if I have to die on the crapper, please God let it happen while I'm "upper decking" the local American Legion post's bathroom. Amen.

classicman 03-05-2009 11:09 PM

Gupta Withdraws

Quote:

Dr. Sanjay Gupta has withdrawn his name from consideration to become surgeon general, the White House confirmed to CBS News today.

Gupta, a neurosurgeon, pulled out from consideration "in order to continue devoting time to his medical career and of course his work at CNN,” according to CNN U.S. President Jon Klein.

Jerry Farrell, head of the Commissioned Officers Association, which represents the group overseen by the surgeon general, told Fox News that possible candidates have been calling his office to express their interest in the job now that Gupta has withdrawn and “the bidding process [is] open again."

News broke in early January that Gupta had sat down with President Obama and had been offered the position. It looked likely at the time he would take the job.

"He has asked for a few days to figure out the financial and logistical details of moving his family from Atlanta to Washington but is expected to accept the offer,” the Washington Post reported at the time.

Since then, however, there has been little discussion of Gupta taking up the offer. Had he done so, the CBS News and CNN contributor, who had been a White House fellow, would likely have become the highest-profile surgeon general in U.S. history.

Gupta did not attend today’s health care summit at the White House.
Not because of taxes, but an apparently good candidate chose not to serve.

elSicomoro 03-05-2009 11:11 PM

Hmmm...wonder if it was a money issue. He's probably making some nice cheddar on TV...he wouldn't make shit in politics (relatively speaking).

TGRR 03-05-2009 11:32 PM

Jesus. Obama's the only person in America hiring, and nobody wants anything to do with it.

:lol:

elSicomoro 03-05-2009 11:44 PM

Depends on what I have to do...I just had to fill out a 20-page application for a fucking civilian job with the St. Louis County Police Department. Can a government job be much worse, especially given the track record of the people that work in it?

TGRR 03-05-2009 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542012)
Depends on what I have to do...I just had to fill out a 20-page application for a fucking civilian job with the St. Louis County Police Department. Can a government job be much worse, especially given the track record of the people that work in it?

Wait. What? You want to be a COP in ST LOUIS?

No, no job can be much worse.

elSicomoro 03-05-2009 11:50 PM

Civilian job...and it's St. Louis County, which is separate from St. Louis City. Not that I have any problems with the City, since I live in it.

TGRR 03-05-2009 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542021)
Civilian job...and it's St. Louis County, which is separate from St. Louis City. Not that I have any problems with the City, since I live in it.

Mark your highway exits, please. :mad2:

elSicomoro 03-05-2009 11:57 PM

Huh? Which highway were you on here that didn't have markers? Shit, we're not California (though I hear they're working on things out there). ;)

TGRR 03-06-2009 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542025)
Huh? Which highway were you on here that didn't have markers? Shit, we're not California (though I hear they're working on things out there). ;)


55W --> 44W, middle of the night, during construction (this was about 4 years ago). No detour signs. No alternate route. Nada.

classicman 03-06-2009 12:12 AM

they must have known it was tigger

elSicomoro 03-06-2009 12:13 AM

Especially since 55 West doesn't even exist. ;)

sugarpop 03-07-2009 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542025)
Huh? Which highway were you on here that didn't have markers? Shit, we're not California (though I hear they're working on things out there). ;)

ummm, California has very well marked roads. I lived there for ten years, and have travelled across country 4 times, and from Miami to Toronto. California has the best marked freeways I have ever seen.

TGRR 03-07-2009 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542035)
Especially since 55 West doesn't even exist. ;)

55 whichever, out of Chicago. Fer Chrissakes.

elSicomoro 03-07-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sugarpop (Post 542377)
ummm, California has very well marked roads. I lived there for ten years, and have travelled across country 4 times, and from Miami to Toronto. California has the best marked freeways I have ever seen.

I was referring to the lack of exit numbers, which road geeks used to bemoan on Usenet all the time. Threw me off too when I was out there a few years ago. Last I heard, CalTrans is now working on that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TGRR (Post 542392)
55 whichever, out of Chicago. Fer Chrissakes.

I knew what you meant...I was fucking with you. :)

classicman 03-07-2009 01:05 PM

Take it to the travel channel

sugarpop 03-07-2009 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 542448)
I was referring to the lack of exit numbers, which road geeks used to bemoan on Usenet all the time. Threw me off too when I was out there a few years ago. Last I heard, CalTrans is now working on that.

ahhh, ok. Well, they mark roads 3-4 exits in advance, so you have plenty of time to get over. Most freeways don't do that, and I think it's dangerous not to, especially for freeways in/near big cities that have a lot of lanes.

sugarpop 03-07-2009 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 542520)
Take it to the travel channel

topic nazi. :p

classicman 03-11-2009 12:09 AM

Another one rides the bus...

Freeman Withdraws as Top Intelligence Analyst

Quote:

Charles Freeman, the veteran diplomat slated to become the top U.S. intelligence analyst, withdrew under intense pressure from a largely Republican group of lawmakers.

The lawmakers had criticized Freeman’s statements on China, Israel, and the 9/11 attacks, and they had raised concerns about his business ties in the Middle East and China. Dennis Blair, director of national intelligence, said today that he accepted “with regret” Freeman’s decision to give up the post of National Intelligence Council chairman.

Just hours earlier, Blair defended his longtime colleague under sharp questioning at a Senate hearing, calling Freeman, a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, “a person of strong views,” and adding that Freeman wouldn’t serve “precooked pabulum” to policy makers. He also said Freeman’s provocative comments were taken out of context.

Critics focused on Freeman’s comment that the Chinese government acted too slowly to crack down on protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

TGRR 03-11-2009 07:25 AM

Quote:

Charles Freeman, the veteran diplomat slated to become the top U.S. intelligence analyst, withdrew under intense pressure from a largely Republican group of lawmakers.
These dems...no balls AT ALL these days. :lol:

classicman 03-25-2009 06:43 PM

Obama's pick for EPA No. 2 withdraws

Quote:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's pick for the No. 2 post at the Environmental Protection Agency abruptly removed himself from consideration Wednesday, saying the controversy surrounding a foundation he once belonged to would distract from the agency's work.

Jon Cannon, a professor of environmental law at the University of Virginia and the former top EPA lawyer, said he was withdrawing as the nominee for deputy EPA administrator because the nonprofit America's Clean Water Foundation had become the subject of scrutiny. Cannon once served on the now-defunct organization's board of directors.

The EPA's inspector general concluded in 2007 that the foundation mismanaged $25 million in EPA grants that it had received to help identify environmental risks on farms and to assist states and tribes in complying with water pollution laws. The report found that the foundation could not properly account for the money it had been granted.
What the heck is going on? I don't remember this many appointees resigning or being refused in, well forever.

TGRR 03-25-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 549396)
Obama's pick for EPA No. 2 withdraws



What the heck is going on? I don't remember this many appointees resigning or being refused in, well forever.

This is what happens when you actually apply standards in Washington. Obama has managed to fill about 43 out of 350 or so positions.

On the other hand, his pics haven't been exactly stellar. I mean, TOM DASCHLE? Fer Chrissakes.

Redux 03-26-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 549396)
Obama's pick for EPA No. 2 withdraws

What the heck is going on? I don't remember this many appointees resigning or being refused in, well forever.

Yep...its been sloppier than recent administrations..but not so much out of the norm.

Just off the top of my head...

I recall Bush first treasury secretary having tax issues, his first Labor secretary withdrawing because of an illegal immigrant issue, his first homeland security secretary withdrawing because of an illegal immigrant issue and alleged mob ties.

And Bush sub-cabinet nominees withdrawing their names...the top EPA enforcement official because of ties to industries to be enforced, the top mining official at the Dept of Interior for numerous mining violations by his company, top officials at HUD, Energy and Agriculture with questionable past practices in their former industry lives.....

Shawnee123 03-26-2009 10:19 AM

No one wants the job anymore, what with the public scrutiny. Of course, we can hope this brings us more people who DON'T have anything to hide, but these transgressions are nothing new. These issues have always existed: previous administrations were just better at keeping them hidden.

Undertoad 03-26-2009 11:14 AM

It's getting easier to mine information about people's lives.

Shawnee123 03-26-2009 12:21 PM

Good point.

Undertoad 03-26-2009 02:57 PM

And also, I don't think they used to really go after people for each and every detail. Politics is now teams of lawyers, teams of investigators, and teams of digicam shooters waiting for a candidate's macaca moment. It's fucked up.

Happy Monkey 03-26-2009 03:14 PM

I think this is the first time nominees have gotten full IRS audits.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.