The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Home Base (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Riddles (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=4827)

lumberjim 01-22-2004 08:20 PM

well you must be right, cuz i got a 135......and i'm also, coincidentally, worth my weight in dead slugs. ( that's a lot of slugs, btw)

Torrere 01-22-2004 09:13 PM

and that might even be without considering the graphs which show the dramatic increase in average IQ scores over the past 100 years.

(edit: toned down... hehehe)

lumberjim 01-22-2004 09:51 PM

hey, gotta a link to those graphs? what's the explanatoin for it? better education? diet? information technology?

Torrere 01-22-2004 10:30 PM

It's called the Flynn Effect.

I think that class and rising standards of living + education might be part of it; but I don't really know.

http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/00...EF21_arch3.gif

Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

Linked to in Wikipedia:
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/FLYNNEFF.html

SciAm article:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...mber=2&catID=2

An explanation attempt:
http://www.fairtest.org/examarts/Winter%2001-02/IQ.html

A humorous religious correlation:
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001527.html?entry=1527

Torrere 01-22-2004 10:30 PM

What a fantastic coincidence that this is posted in a thread of Riddles!

lumberjim 01-23-2004 12:25 AM

this bit is interesting:
Quote:

Such a result has unexpected implications for the relation between intelligence and age. Older people tend to have lower scores on IQ tests than younger people. Until now, it was always assumed that this means that intelligence diminishes with age. However, this observation can be explained as well by noting that older people were raised in a period when the general level of intelligence was lower. Flynn showed that if people's IQ is evaluated with tests calibrated for the period during which they grew up, an old person scores as well as a young one. The reason that older people do less well on IQ tests is not that they have become more stupid with age, but that the younger generation simply got a head start.
no wonder all my teachers were such idiots.

and i can look forward to dealing with a bunch of smart-ass kids.

wolf 01-23-2004 12:49 AM

HP rocks ... he got the cabin one ... "The plane crashed" is the answer.

Torrere 01-23-2004 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
no wonder all my teachers were such idiots.

and i can look forward to dealing with a bunch of smart-ass kids.

No - but this should be discussed in a different thread.


I met my sister Jenny on London Bridge; I broke her neck and drank her blood and left her out to dry.

xoxoxoBruce 01-23-2004 03:50 AM

140:rolleyes:

Torrere 01-23-2004 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by hot_pastrami
There are three light bulbs in a room with no windows, and a closed door. In front of you are three on-off switches. You know that each switch controls one of the light bulbs inside the room, but you don't know which switch matches which bulb, and they are not wired in any particular order.

Your job is to match each switch to it's bulb. You may only enter the room once, and you may not leave the door open. How do you accomplish your task?
[/b]
I posed this question to my roommate.

His quick response was: "That'd be really easy! You rig up a servo and attach it to a computer and program it to turn the lights on one by one. It turns on one light at the beginning, at ten seconds it turns on a second light, and at twenty seconds it turns on the third light."

Riddle me this: what is his occupation?

Slartibartfast 01-23-2004 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torrere


I met my sister Jenny on London Bridge; I broke her neck and drank her blood and left her out to dry.

Is Jenny a wierd name for a liquor?

I'm still trying to figure out the sister part, maybe its some silly British colloquialism or something.

lumberjim 01-23-2004 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xoxoxoBruce
140:rolleyes:
wow. i think that makes you a genius.

SteveDallas 01-23-2004 09:10 AM

I'm a "facts curator". Interestingly enough the score is lower than what I got in 6th grade when I was tested by a psychologist. Don't know if that's due to differences in the test, or me--not that I'll lie awake worrying about it. (I also am not very convinced of the value of such tests.)

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
and i can look forward to dealing with a bunch of smart-ass kids.
Look forward to??? I don't know about you, but I'm already there! :cool:

Undertoad 01-23-2004 09:29 AM

I'm sticking to my 6th grade score because it indicated that I was a fucking genius and I would be really really saddened if a subsequent test told me that I was not.

That's the actual score, "fucking genius".

I have never found it to have any worth whatsoever in the real world. Most people value what you actually do, not what you're capable of, and rightly so. (If you can find someone who values you based on what you're capable of, hang onto them with both hands.)

Michael Roth 01-23-2004 10:00 AM

I must have drank too much at some point. As a youth I scored a 181, but now it is 154.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.