![]() |
You could hang out with them on a message board for a few weeks. It's not very efficient, I know. I'm pretty sure I could put the more active users in order from smartest down and be fairly accurate, though.
|
Quote:
|
overacheiving does not equate to intelligence. has he gotten smart all of the sudden, or just working really hard?
|
Quote:
|
Personally, I think the IQ or any personality test shouldn't be a be a main determinant for any job since someone with a lower IQ can easily outperform someone with a higher IQ if they know what they are doing and have common sense.
In football for example, they don't determine who is going to be on the team just from forty times or how much someone can bench, they determine that from who performs best on the field and it should be the same way for any job. Being extremely fast helps a receiver a lot but I guarantee that 7 out of 10 times, the fastest guy will not be the best just like I bet the person with the highest IQ will rarely be the best person for a job. If they are not smart enough to make the cut they will naturally be left behind just like an unathletic person will be left behind at football. The IQ or whatever tests can be good to weed out some people but it should never have the final say. |
Quote:
|
One of the classes I used to help out in for Community College was an entry class, humanities.
Occasionally I would get kids who could not read... that was one thing, but every now and again I would get those who could not communicate at all. How those in their previous schools passed them from class to class, year to year is unconscionable. |
I don't think so -- IQ isn't a really reliable predictor of success. I have a high IQ, for instance, but I suck at office work and a lot of other practical things because I don't have a lot of mental discipline, and my mind wanders.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.