The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   ACORN (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=18380)

TheMercenary 10-10-2008 07:30 PM

ACORN
 
What the hell were these people thinking. Do they not realize how bad this makes the process look? I wonder how many people were actually registered as Republickins and how many were registered as Demoncrats. And people think that there was fraud when Bush was elected. If Obama gets the nod people are going to make the issues with Bush look like child play.

1 VOTER, 72 REGISTRATIONS
'ACORN PAID ME IN CASH & CIGS'

http://www.nypost.com/seven/10102008...ons_132965.htm

Missouri officials suspect fake voter registration

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081009/...ge/voter_fraud

The State Auditor's Office conducted an audit of the voter registration system at the Secretary of State's Office last November.

Auditors identified 49,049 registered voters state-wide who may have been ineligible to vote. Approximately 23,576 may have been deceased and another 23,114 were possible felons. And they found more than 2,359 duplicate records.

http://www.click2houston.com/investi...75/detail.html

tw 10-10-2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 492231)
1 VOTER, 72 REGISTRATIONS
'ACORN PAID ME IN CASH & CIGS'

How does ACORN register anyone. All they can do is provide a voter registration card and maybe deliver the completed card to the voter registration board. Only the citizen and voter registration board can register that citizen. Or does it work differently in some states?

You fill out the form, sign it, and mail it (or have it delivered) to the voter registration board. That board either registers you to vote or rejects you. How does ACORN get involved other than give you a blank form and beg you to fill it out?

TheMercenary 10-10-2008 08:19 PM

And then ACORN submits the form for you. Walla, you are registered. There are registration drives all over the country. The Dems are targeting rock concerts a lot lately. We had a community music fest that lasted 4 days. They were at every event.

lookout123 10-10-2008 11:50 PM

ACORN is a dirty nasty organization that I've personally had the displeasure of dealing with. They took Jesse Jackson's business model to the next level.

ZenGum 10-11-2008 02:10 AM

Is ACORN handing out enrollment forms at rock concerts any different (ethically) from the behavior of that Southern Christian college (I forget then name) which we discussed elsewhere, of doing everything they could to get their students voting?

Seriously folks, I'm just asking for information, or at least informed opinion. What rules are being broken, how, and by whom?

Down Under, enrollment is compulsory and the Australian Electoral Commission has frequent media campaigns (especially before elections) to encourage people to sign up. They have info at most government offices and do other outreach stuff. It is completely non-partisan.
I think the left-er of our two main parties does sometimes have enrollment encouragement drives since younger voters tend to be left. It's not a big thing. Don't think handing out cigarettes would work too well for their image, though.

TheMercenary 10-11-2008 07:14 AM

I think when you sign up the same guy 72 times and use different names and pay him to sign up, that might be a problem. I could be wrong but.....

lookout123 10-11-2008 09:04 AM

My personal experience involves them contacting a company I worked for and demanding a shakedown check, "to help minority homeowners". The company refused.

-Their people contacting mortgage holders with hispanic last names and telling them if they'll go to court and say they didn't know english when they signed loan docs, they might not have to repay their loans.

-Their people paraded in front of our buildings wearing shark costumes

-They worked with the press and named individual loan officers and lied about the events.

-They prepped clients who were perfectly fluent in english to go into court and say only, "no habla".

-Then when the company finally handed over more than $200,000,000 to make the press stop, very little of it went to our actual former clients

Then they moved on to the next company. I'd like to see anyone associated with that organization die a very slow and painful death.

TheMercenary 10-11-2008 09:18 AM

I didn't know that they were that diverse in thier illegal acitons. Sounds just like PUSH and Jessie Jackson.

tw 10-11-2008 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 492345)
I think when you sign up the same guy 72 times and use different names and pay him to sign up, that might be a problem. I could be wrong but.....

If you sign up the same guy 72 times, the same voter registration board registers him to vote only once. Where is the problem? Apparently the guy is making money off Acorn by sending in the same form 72 times. No problem. In November, he can still only vote once.

Shawnee123 10-11-2008 11:25 AM

Good point, tw.

tw 10-11-2008 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 492422)
Good point, tw.

However I made the same point in yesterday's post #2. Why does this post say anything different?

Shawnee123 10-11-2008 11:38 AM

My job precludes me reading every single post and hanging on to every word. You egocentric goof. ;) Mostly, I felt this last post was more succinct and got right to the point.

Clodfobble 10-11-2008 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw
How does ACORN register anyone. All they can do is provide a voter registration card and maybe deliver the completed card to the voter registration board. Only the citizen and voter registration board can register that citizen. Or does it work differently in some states?

You fill out the form, sign it, and mail it (or have it delivered) to the voter registration board. That board either registers you to vote or rejects you. How does ACORN get involved other than give you a blank form and beg you to fill it out?

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw
If you sign up the same guy 72 times, the same voter registration board registers him to vote only once. Where is the problem? Apparently the guy is making money off Acorn by sending in the same form 72 times. No problem. In November, he can still only vote once.

It's just a question of writing style. The second quote makes it much more clear what you're trying to say.

Undertoad 10-11-2008 12:00 PM

It does sort of bollix things up at the always-undermanned voter registration board, when they have to account for your load of crap.

TheMercenary 10-11-2008 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 492420)
If you sign up the same guy 72 times, the same voter registration board registers him to vote only once. Where is the problem? Apparently the guy is making money off Acorn by sending in the same form 72 times. No problem. In November, he can still only vote once.

According to the news reports they are not using the same name or address, they are changing the names and or address each time. What they have effectively done is placed the Sec of State to have to verify a flood of names. I think they should withhold all election results til after the names have been verified after the polls close. It may take a few weeks (again) to find out who won, but it would eliminate this fraud.

richlevy 10-11-2008 12:50 PM

The problem with the 'possible felon' designation is that the Florida experience showed that this was fraught with error. It appears that if someone with your name was in prison in that state, they can challenge your vote and the onus is on you to prove that you were never a felon.

I don't want fraudulent votes, but I don't want fraudulent challenges either, and a part of me wonders if the anti-fraud campaign is a method for lowering legitimate turnout and pushing up wait times at the polls to discourage voting.

While arguments can be made for tactics like caging, more arguments can be made against it. Nowhere in the Constitution does it mention giving up your right to vote because you weren't home to sign for a letter.

I agree that there will be a lot of challenges in this election. Thankfully after the disastrous results from the last two elections (and for once I'm not referring to who was elected), we came up with a clear procedure for provisional ballots. Forcing people in poor districts to wait for hours in line to vote as opposed to wealthier districts is in my opinion a violation of the equal protection clause.

There is a significant chance that provisional and absentee ballots will decide this election.

FYI, Tim Griffin, the GOP's current Deputy Head of Research was tied to voter caging by Monica Goodling during her testimony.

TheMercenary 10-11-2008 12:55 PM

The "felon" issue is not as big as the "dead people" and the blatant fraud by ACORN re-registering people over and over with slightly different names and paying them to do so. If they have to delay the results till all the names are vetted, so be it.

Shawnee123 10-11-2008 01:10 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here we go again.

glatt 10-11-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by richlevy (Post 492464)
a part of me wonders if the anti-fraud campaign is a method for lowering legitimate turnout and pushing up wait times at the polls to discourage voting.

It's interesting being in a battleground state. Never happened for me before. The Obama volunteers are extremely active. They have called us at least a dozen times in the last few months. Our Democratic "neighborhood chiefs" sent us a letter recently urging us to vote early in order to help reduce wait times at the polls for others on election day. That had never occurred to me, but it's a great idea. Virginia has very lenient standards for early voting. The fact that I work in DC, and am out of my county for more than 11 hours of the day means that I'm eligible to vote early. I just voted today, which was way more convenient for me. Took 20 minutes and was on a Saturday. Plus I can also impact the election by lowering wait times slightly for others

I think one of the reasons that my household has been targeted so heavily is that we voted in a Democrat school board primary a couple months ago. Only 5% of the county voted in that election.

TheMercenary 10-11-2008 03:24 PM

Early voting has been a life saver and something they should have done years ago. We started early voting, this year, 4 weeks before the election, M-F.

Cicero 10-12-2008 12:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
:D
Attachment 19849


He must be looking at my ballot...lol! Did you know you can just write stuff in?:headshake

Happy Monkey 10-12-2008 12:25 PM

They're legally required to submit all forms that are filled out, even if one person fills out multiple forms. Even if it's an obvious fake, like Mickey Mouse. Filtering out names they don't like would be much worse than submitting extra names (who obviously won't be actually voting).

On the scale of voting problems, extra registrations are a nuisance, extra voting is a problem, and preventing legitimate votes is nefarious. Only the first and third are in any way common. If people were actually voting 72 times, the registration story would be background info for that story.

TheMercenary 10-12-2008 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 492769)
They're legally required to submit all forms that are filled out, even if one person fills out multiple forms. Even if it's an obvious fake, like Mickey Mouse. Filtering out names they don't like would be much worse than submitting extra names (who obviously won't be actually voting).

On the scale of voting problems, extra registrations are a nuisance, extra voting is a problem, and preventing legitimate votes is nefarious. Only the first and third are in any way common. If people were actually voting 72 times, the registration story would be background info for that story.

More total Bull Shit. Flooding a election office with 6000 fake votes is an obvious attempt to overwhelm the system and suspect of voter fraud. I doubt there is a single registered republickin in the batch.

TheMercenary 10-12-2008 08:10 PM

Florida fucks the country again............

Florida Sun Sentinel

More than 30,000 Florida felons who by law should have been stripped of their right to vote remain registered to cast ballots in this presidential battleground state, a Sun Sentinel investigation has found.

Many are faithful voters, with at least 4,900 turning out in past elections.

Another 5,600 are not likely to vote Nov. 4 — they're still in prison.

Of the felons who registered with a party, Democrats outnumber Republicans more than two to one.

xoxoxoBruce 10-13-2008 02:01 AM

I find it hard to believe the state doesn't know the Social Security numbers of the felons they've incarcerated. I find it easy to believe the state hasn't bothered to clean their voter roles, as nobody gives a shit about them till election time.

I wonder if the felons get called for jury duty? :eyebrow:

If the election board can't clear all the names before the election, have those people vote on paper ballots and hold the ballots until they can clear the names.

If the difference in the vote count, between the winner and loser is greater than the held paper ballots, go with that result. If it's not, hold the final count until the names are cleared.

If the result of the Presidential election were delayed a week or two, I'll bet when the next election rolled around, they'd have their shit together.
There's no reason they can't set a registration deadline, say, three months before the vote, and staff the board with enough people.

Cicero 10-13-2008 09:29 AM

Nevermind.

Shawnee123 10-13-2008 09:40 AM

Early voting is stupid. A lot can change in a month, but you've already voted when you find out Candidate A is actually an outer space alien with a book called To Serve Man, which is actually a cookbook.

What happened to having to work for your vote, getting up early or stopping after a long day of work? Maybe waiting in line? It MEANS something, you've had to make an effort. If you absolutely can't be there, that's what absentee ballots are for.

Next thing they will come to each and everyone of our residences, ask who you want to vote for, then fill in a ballot for you. No risk of tampering there. :rolleyes: Let's start mid-summer to avoid the cold weather.

I don't know that I want voting to be the easiest thing on earth. Make people work a little for their vote. Is there a better feeling than walking out of the voting area on election day, knowing you did your part as a citizen, knowing it meant enough to you to make the effort?

Eh, unpopular opinion, I'm sure.

Happy Monkey 10-13-2008 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 492835)
More total Bull Shit. Flooding a election office with 6000 fake votes is an obvious attempt to overwhelm the system and suspect of voter fraud. I doubt there is a single registered republickin in the batch.

Maybe, maybe not. But the fact remains that they're legally required to turn in every form they get.

You seem to like to toss out the term "bull shit", and then not respond to the post you're quoting.

This isn't the first time that GOTV people have been paid by the signature. If it had led to people voting 72 times, that would be the story. As it is, ACORN threw their money away, and the guy who signed up 72 times has a bit of extra cash. Maybe they thought it was worth it if it made their stats look good for future monetary supporters.

classicman 10-13-2008 09:51 AM

No make it really easy to vote - lets all just do it on the interwebz. Oh wait thats discriminating against those that don't have computers. :eyebrow:

We can't make it inconvenient, too many people don't vote as it is. We have to make it easy for everyone - lets just have the Gov't send people drive around to collect votes. That way the people who are "too busy" can have their vote counted. Hell, they won't have to drag the crack whores outta the subsidized housing either - they'll just show up and show them where to mark the ballot. :rolleyes:

I agree with you S123 - I enjoy voting and take a lot of pride knowing that I have a say, no matter how small. Its a privilege that too many in this country don't appreciate.

Cicero 10-13-2008 10:00 AM

New Bumper sticker: I am a crack whore and I vote!

classicman 10-13-2008 10:16 AM

Wouldn't they have to have a car to put it on? Maybe we could do T-shirts instead

Shawnee123 10-13-2008 10:21 AM

A crack ho could wear the bumper sticker as a shirt, cause they're all like emaciated and stuff...

eh, I got nothin'

Cicero 10-13-2008 10:25 AM

Me either, cuz it was never funny to begin with....

classicman 10-13-2008 10:54 AM

ouch

Shawnee123 10-13-2008 10:57 AM

What, didja sit on a gerbil (again) classic?

:lol:

classicman 10-13-2008 11:09 AM

State GOP Leaders Accuse ACORN of Vote Fraud
 
by GARRY LENTON, Of The Patriot-News Friday October 10, 2008

Quote:

State Republican leaders are accusing a community-based group it claims has links to Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, of deliberately filing fraudulent voter registration forms across the state.
Voter registration officials in Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Allegheny County have reported problems with registrations filed on behalf of voters by The Association of Community Organizations, or ACORN. ...
A York man employed by ACORN part-time was arrested Saturday and charged with submitting more than 100 bogus registrations during an eight-day period in June. ...

I think this is a case of a guy not working and filling out a bunch of paperwork to justify himself. It is not the first nor second...time this accusation has been levied against ACORN.

Interestingly enough - A spokesman from ACORN was on a cable news ow this am - not sure if it was CNN... I know it wasn't Fox or MSNBC..anyway she was very unapologetic about the fact that ACORN has endorsed Obama and is sharing that view with their newly found registrants.

classicman 10-13-2008 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shawnee123 (Post 493043)
What, didja sit on a gerbil (again) classic?

:lol:

I thought so too - then I realized that $9,000,000 was missing from under my chair.

Shawnee123 10-13-2008 12:52 PM

:)

classicman 10-14-2008 11:50 AM

More claims about ACORN and "multiple thousands" of bogus registrations in PA alone - oh that and something about $800,000 to a subsidiary of theirs?? I don't care enough to look it all up anymore. This shit is so fucked up that I'm way past discouraged at this point. All I can tell is that they are all a bunch of liars thieves and cheats taking as much as thy can from people who actually work for a living. Doesn't matter what label they have on. Rep or Dem they're all the same. The two choices of their opposing ideology just assures an even split of the goods.

glatt 10-14-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 493502)
All I can tell is that they are all a bunch of liars thieves and cheats taking as much as thy can from people who actually work for a living.

Who exactly are they stealing from here?

classicman 10-14-2008 12:21 PM

ME! And probably you.

glatt 10-14-2008 12:36 PM

We're talking about ACORN, right? How is ACORN stealing from me? By creating a little extra work for poll workers? And my taxes pay for the poll workers? Is that what you are trying to say? I honestly don't see any other way you could argue ACORN is stealing from me.

xoxoxoBruce 10-14-2008 12:44 PM

Obama's campaign paid Citizens Services Inc., a subsidiary of ACORN, to work in "get-out-the-vote" projects, in Ohio. Campaign contributions, not tax money, so I doubt it was classic's money.:headshake

classicman 10-14-2008 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt (Post 493539)
We're talking about ACORN, right? How is ACORN stealing from me? By creating a little extra work for poll workers? And my taxes pay for the poll workers? Is that what you are trying to say? I honestly don't see any other way you could argue ACORN is stealing from me.

Sorry,no - there was some thread drift there. I was referring to my taxes paying for the promises of the candidates.

classicman 10-14-2008 01:18 PM

Re: ACORN ...

Quote:

Multiple registrants tell Cuyahoga County Elections Board ACORN workers begged for signatures
Pair signed multiple vote cards for ACORN

Johnson and another prolific registrant were subpoenaed to testify at a meeting Monday as the Elections Board continued its look at possible fraud by ACORN, a national organization that tries to get low- and moderate-income people to register. ACORN's methods have drawn interest in a number of states this presidential election year.

Johnson, 19, said he mostly was trying to help ACORN workers who begged him to sign up because they needed to keep their jobs.

"They'd come up with a sob story why they needed the signature," said Johnson, of Garfield Heights.

ACORN leaders have acknowledged that workers paid by the hour were given quotas to fill.

Board member Sandy McNair said ACORN did not do a competent job carrying out its business plan. Members, in fact, said little about ACORN. And they turned their investigation over to the county sheriff and prosecutor.

A second person to testify, Christopher Barkley, 33, said ACORN workers pestered him while they tried to gather signatures.

Barkley, of Cleveland, said he was homeless and reading a book on Public Square when he signed some of the 13 cards that contain his name. He filled out cards - with his mother's house or workplace as the address - to help workers stay employed.

Board member Rob Frost, also the county GOP chairman, said he is not convinced Barkley and Johnson would have tried to vote more than once. He said it's clear ACORN workers disregarded registration laws.

"I wouldn't want there to be widespread fear that what ACORN has caused will lead to widespread [voter] fraud," Frost said after the meeting.

Board workers said ACORN had turned in nearly 72,000 cards since January. Of those, more than 5,000 were missing information and so could not be used. The board could not verify the address on 3,500 others. Those people will have to vote provisionally if they turn out at the polls.
Seems like the system is working pretty well.

glatt 10-14-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 493562)
Sorry,no - there was some thread drift there. I was referring to my taxes paying for the promises of the candidates.

Ah. I got ya now. Can't argue with that then.

classicman 10-14-2008 02:34 PM

Just found this from the
Wall Street Journal
Quote:

Acorn -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -- has been around since 1970 and boasts 350,000 members. We've written about them for years, but Acorn is now getting more attention as John McCain's campaign makes an issue of the fraud reports and Acorn's ties to Mr. Obama. It's about time someone exposed this shady outfit that uses government dollars to lobby for larger government.

Acorn uses various affiliated groups to agitate for "a living wage," for "affordable housing," for "tax justice" and union and environmental goals, as well as against school choice and welfare reform. It was a major contributor to the subprime meltdown by pushing lenders to make home loans on easy terms, conducting "strikes" against banks so they'd lower credit standards.

But the organization's real genius is getting American taxpayers to foot the bill. According to a 2006 report from the Employment Policies Institute (EPI), Acorn has been on the federal take since 1977. For instance, Acorn's American Institute for Social Justice claimed $240,000 in tax money between fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Its American Environmental Justice Project received 100% of its revenue from government grants in the same years. EPI estimates the Acorn Housing Corporation alone received some $16 million in federal dollars from 1997-2007. Only recently, Democrats tried and failed to stuff an "affordable housing" provision into the $700 billion bank rescue package that would have let politicians give even more to Acorn.

The Michigan Secretary of State told the press in September that Acorn had submitted "a sizeable number of duplicate and fraudulent applications." Earlier this month, Nevada's Democratic Secretary of State Ross Miller requested a raid on Acorn's offices, following complaints of false names and fictional addresses (including the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys). Nevada's Clark County Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax said he saw rampant fraud in 2,000 to 3,000 applications Acorn submitted weekly.

Officials in Ohio are investigating voter fraud connected with Acorn, and Florida's Seminole County is withholding Acorn registrations that appear fraudulent. New Mexico, North Carolina and Missouri are looking into hundreds of dubious Acorn registrations. Wisconsin is investigating Acorn employees for, according to an election official, "making people up or registering people that were still in prison."

Then there's Lake County, Indiana, which has already found more than 2,100 bogus applications among the 5,000 Acorn dumped right before the deadline. "All the signatures looked exactly the same," said Ruthann Hoagland, of the county election board. Bridgeport, Connecticut estimates about 20% of Acorn's registrations were faulty. As of July, the city of Houston had rejected or put on hold about 40% of the 27,000 registration cards submitted by Acorn.

That's just this year. In 2004, four Acorn employees were indicted in Ohio for submitting false voter registrations. In 2005, two Colorado Acorn workers were found to have submitted false registrations. Four Acorn Missouri employees were indicted in 2006; five were found guilty in Washington state in 2007 for filling out registration forms with names from a phone book.

Which brings us to Mr. Obama, who got his start as a Chicago "community organizer" at Acorn's side. In 1992 he led voter registration efforts as the director of Project Vote, which included Acorn. This past November, he lauded Acorn's leaders for being "smack dab in the middle" of that effort. Mr. Obama also served as a lawyer for Acorn in 1995, in a case against Illinois to increase access to the polls.

During his tenure on the board of Chicago's Woods Fund, that body funneled more than $200,000 to Acorn. More recently, the Obama campaign paid $832,000 to an Acorn affiliate. The campaign initially told the Federal Election Commission this money was for "staging, sound, lighting." It later admitted the cash was to get out the vote.
This doesn't look very good either.

xoxoxoBruce 10-15-2008 05:01 AM

The problem with that article is that Acorn is a large organization involved with at least a dozen different projects through various sub-groups and affiliates.

One part of the article talks about the American Institute for Social Justice and the next sentence the American Environmental Justice Project. Then the next talks about the Acorn Housing Corporation. They talk like it's one entity where it's really a bunch of them under the Acorn banner.

Quote:

Which brings us to Mr. Obama, who got his start as a Chicago "community organizer" at Acorn's side.
And the side of anyone else that was working to help the poor.
Quote:

In 1992 he led voter registration efforts as the director of Project Vote, which included Acorn.
"Included Acorn", but don't bother to tell us who or how many others it included.
Quote:

This past November, he lauded Acorn's leaders for being "smack dab in the middle" of that effort.
I'm sure most people, including McCain, would praise any group that tried to get people involved and registered to vote.
Quote:

Mr. Obama also served as a lawyer for Acorn in 1995, in a case against Illinois to increase access to the polls.
Obama, Acorn, and others, were fighting the same fight, so working together makes sense.

It's apparent that some of the people working on getting people registered to vote, are former Enron accountants, trying to bolster their performance with phony names. But that said, it doesn't mean that everything Acorn does, or the people that work with them, are tainted.

Pico and ME 10-15-2008 08:08 AM

I am really tired of this 'association game' the McCain campaign is playing. But I guess it is a tried and true republican tactic. Its so ingrained that they do it EVEN when their candidate is guilty of the same association!

Heres McCain sitting next to Rep. Kendrick Meek at a rally that was spinsored by NAOC in sponsorship with ACORN. McCain was the keynote speaker.

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s...CORN_dc004.jpg

TheMercenary 10-15-2008 07:25 PM

This is funny. ACORN idiots.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e43_1224086229&p=1

Cicero 10-16-2008 10:37 AM

People are pushing really hard for registrations right now (recently), and often people that are unqualified try to register. This is why people collecting registrations get paid per verifiable registrant and not unverfiable registrants. The person out there with a clipboard is not allowed to do a background check on your registration qualifications they are only supposed to get people signed up just in case.

Then they turn the paperwork into the appropriate department to fact check because they are not permitted to do so.

My point? The whole basis for the ACORN scandal is off by miles. It is only their job to collect information so people can register and not verify it. If the government has a problem with verifying registrations maybe they should not outsource to people that try to do the footwork for their lazy fucking asses. Huh? Do you think that they are going to have their own people pounding the pavement so people will register? Fucking no. They have to contract with someone because they huff and puff when real work has to get done.

If people sign up and know they are not qualified, that is on them and not the company hired to do the registration drive. All of the information is verified every time a registration drive occurs. This happens on the local level and during a national election. Why make a stink about false registrations now? Many people are hit up to just sign the clipboard and guess what? They do. And yes it is the job of the department to verify everyone's registration status when they indicate their intention to vote. Ab so fucking lutely. And. I like ACORN. They sponsored some projects with a group I was with about 3 years ago, and they were fantastic. Oh the scandal. ;)

Pico and ME 10-16-2008 10:45 AM

:thumb:

Shawnee123 10-16-2008 10:47 AM

Hey, why you not on the hatin' bandwagon, Cic? :rolleyes:

Nice post! I second Pico's thumbs up!

Cicero 10-16-2008 10:52 AM

I'm sorry, I was still editing when you guys commented. Heh. Sorry. The post is a little more "detailed" now. You may put your thumbs down if you wish. lol! Value added cussing happened because Cicero got tired of hearing about the third party utilized in a political scandal because it is the first thing people do. Pick on the the third party contractor doing the work as they are usually a little squemish non-profit. That just happened during the last job, then trickled down to me and I have a knee jerk when I see it happen to someone else. I got played. And so is ACORN. They are not contracted to verify the information because that is against the law. And the job of your voting offices and whatever lazy ass is hating the fact that they have to do their job right now.

TheMercenary 10-16-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cicero (Post 494251)
I'm sorry, I was still editing when you guys commented. Heh. Sorry. The post is a little more "detailed" now. You may put your thumbs down if you wish. lol! Value added cussing happened because Cicero got tired of hearing about the third party utilized in a political scandal because it is the first thing people do. Pick on the the third party contractor doing the work as they are usually a little squemish non-profit. That just happened during the last job, then trickled down to me and I have a knee jerk when I see it happen to someone else. I got played. And so is ACORN. They are not contracted to verify the information because that is against the law. And the job of your voting offices and whatever lazy ass is hating the fact that they have to do their job right now.

I can't blame the people working for ACORN for scaming the system. Looks like they have either been encouraged to do it or are motivated by the income. No one should be faulted for that. But you would think they might have a little bit of ethics and morality, considering they are dealing with an election, to not go back to the same guy 72 times.

Cicero 10-16-2008 12:10 PM

What's to scam? Fake registrations they don't get paid for? Come fucking on. That's how these numbers got out, because all of it is supposed to be validated. Who probably noticed the issue first? ACORN. No matter who contracts to do a drive there is always a voter asshole, or several. ACORN can't judge and not allow a tranny to register. ACORN isn't even allowed to ask for a fucking id. Get REAL.

ACORN is not allowed, to disallow the same person from registering 100 times or a thousand if they want to. They supply names, addresses, signatures, party affiliation, and that is all they are fucking there to do. That's it. That is all. They are not allowed to validate shit because of the liability of your information being supplied to one of their peasant registrars. That's why it is the job of the registration office to do their job. ACORN did theirs. Collect information. Good or Bad. They collect information. They are not responsible for the dumb ass people that try and register 200 times. Their only job is to collect the data for verification. Someone can write BOOGA BOOGA BOOGA is my name and I live at 55 Dope Ln. in Chattanooga fuckedville, AK 80097, and I am voting with Martian Party @$#$%^%^. And ACORN has to supply it for verification. They are contracted to do their job and they have. They didn't hide the information the public gave them which is why it's so fucking easy to blame them. They did their job. Which is why you, Merc. Even found out about it.

They said hey! We have collected this name 70 times mmm'kay? And submit. Their job, that's it.

So say they are scammers, whatever. It just says more about the American Public and the crazy shit they do and say, than ACORN.

A four time felon can say yes I want to register, and ACORN says sign here..They are not allowed into that guy's records. AT ALL. It does them no good to get bad signatures. But 14 percent of signatures are bad for one reason or another. That's the public for you. And it happens every time. Not just this election, but for every local or state or any other initiative, where you have people signing a clipboard, people are going to write bullshit. Unusable bullshit. This happens all the time Merc. Not just ACORN and not just this election.

That's right, get random registrar with random John Q., and a lot of your information is going to be unusable for various reasons.

Do you know what ACORN is allowed to check? Whether the information supplied was legible (outside of the signature), and to ask that they sign again if it was not.

I know these elections are getting heated, but let's not lose sight of basic, really basic facts. ACORN did their job and I am sticking to that. I have no political MO for saying that either. None.

Oh and this doesn't mean that you aren't my awesome Merc. :) mmm k? ;)

classicman 10-16-2008 12:15 PM

I'm just asking here, How do you know the peeps on the street are not paid based upon the number vs. quality?

Shawnee123 10-16-2008 12:39 PM

Probably from a news source, I mean other than the Cellar:

Levenson "also strenuously denied suggestions that the group pays canvassers by the number of names they sign up, and that they have quotas," which has been otherwise misreported by many, even as a quick check of Acorn's fact sheets note that "Our canvassers are paid by the hour, not by the card," and that "Acorn has a zero-tolerance policy for deliberately falsifying registrations, and in the cases where our internal quality controls have identified this happening we have fired the workers involved and turned them in to election officials and law-enforcement".

AND

Those who wish to believe in the hoax, however, attempt to link to article after article about allegations of voter fraud carried out by Acorn. And yet, the articles themselves - if one bothers to actually read them - reveal that either 1) They describe allegations and investigations brought by Republican agents, with little or no evidence of any wrong doing, and certainly no "voter fraud" 2) Where voter registration fraud has occurred it has been by rogue Acorn employees, originally reported to authorities by Acorn themselves, or 3) Smoke and mirrors are used to cloud the fact that not a single fraudulent vote has actually been cast by anyone associated or registered by Acorn.

glatt 10-16-2008 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 494269)
I can't blame the people working for ACORN for scaming the system. Looks like they have either been encouraged to do it or are motivated by the income. No one should be faulted for that...

So are you saying that 85% of ACORN's problems are directly traceable to top management?

Shawnee123 10-16-2008 12:46 PM

Sheesh...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.