Vote The Incumbents out!
 

It might be interesting, or not, where a fellow dwellar stands on the elections coming up in November. I decided months ago to vote every incumbent out of their cushy chairs and that means in my own state as well as the government.

The state of the union is a mess. I don't need to say how; I know everyone knows of the problems with the business as usual mindset.

Here is a list of senators on both sides of the isle. I have it bookmarked and I am crossing off everyone of them that loses with an enormous amount of glee. It feels more like simmering anger than glee, but maybe my gleeful feelings will increase as each one loses..

http://www.voteoutincumbents.org/Sen...mmittees.xhtml

Kick them out.org has a video at the end of the page. It is a little cheesy but true.
http://kickthemout.org/

This post might seem fanciful and perhaps surprising because I do not try to play check mate on the politics forum but I do consider myself and American with an axe to grind.

Surprise!

This is a census year, which means it's also a redistricting year. The party that is in power in the state when it is time to redistrict will enjoy enormous advantages over the other party for ten years, when the next redistricting will take place. That party (at the state level) will be able to redraw the district maps in a way that virtually guarantees a victory in almost every election with a minimal effort.

Choose wisely.

Oh, and play the online redistricting game to see how it works.

In the redistrict game I linked to above, I was easily able to draw the map to switch a state from 2 seats for each party to 1 seat for one party and 3 seats for the other. It's easy and kind of fun. And shows how the stakes are very high this year. (Remember that the state representative you send to your state capitol will be the same guy that draws your map that decides who will win the congressional elections for the next 10 years.)

Here's how I did in the game. Top one is before, bottom one was my redrawing.

Interesting game glatt, though it might take a while to play.

Yeah, about 15 minutes.

http://www.congress.org/election/home/

Browse races by state or view your congressional districts.

Right on Sky!

Throw the bums out! Both parties have failed, and we need to get away from any one party holding all the cards, both House and Senate, as well as the WH.

There is a lot of talk that losing the house might help Obama. I think the balance of power would be in check and maybe we can see something positive happen. The alternative is the status quo. I don't think anyone wants that.

....BUT the incumbents of both parties have to go!

There is only one card in the WH and its not changing anytime soon.
As for the Senate - It'll probably end up pretty close, with one party having a 4 seat majority. Enough to stagnate things and ensure that we get plenty more finger-pointing for 2012.

What do you mean by the status quo? Many people are extremely happy with it, while others vehemently oppose it.

well, I didn't mean the rock band.>.<

lol - thanks. That makes it much clearer. :p

Voting the incumbents out sounds great, until you see what's left to vote for. The voters in Delaware are facing that horrifying choice.

That situation there is hilarious.

BTW, she is totally giving lie to the Tea Party's claim that they are around only because of the economy. Its really all about bringing the culture war back to the forefront. (Gays-Abortion-Religion in Government)

Oh there is NO CHOICE in DE.
I'd vote for Spexxie before that woman.

Voting for her is like setting yourself of fire to protest a war. The only one that gets burnt is you.

Jimmy Carter admitted to lust in his heart again last night on the Daily Show.

Yay TEA Party!
Vote for Chris Coons. He's not an incumbent.

Stop stalking me.

If I were in DE, I'd have voted for him no matter who won the R primary.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

:hide:

He needs to learn when to keep his mouth shut.

Maybe he needed to when he was President, but not anymore! It was one of his best lines.

I saw in the elevator news that he compared himself to the other ex-presidents and said he was probably a better ex. was that on the Daily Show too, or someplace else?

In an interview taped for NBC Nightly News tonight, former President Jimmy Carter says: "I feel that my role as a former president is probably superior to that of other presidents."

IMHO the WH and who is there is never as important as who is in congress and who controls either house, and their relationship to who is in the WH. Right now what we have is no different from when Bush2 was in control and the Congress was dominated by Republickins.

I love peasants and their pitchforks!

LOL

You guys still haven't put electoral districting in the hands of an independent authority?

No. It's George Bush's fault. ;):p:

There's no such thing as an independent authority, everything is political.

But the Supreme court ... :right:

Even if they were apolitical, I don't think they'd be up for redistricting the whole country.

A computer program could be apolitical, but the process for picking it couldn't.

Does anyone inhale? Or just deny it?

You got your wish. Looks like most of America agreed with you.

I'm quite interested to see how this plays out.

I voted for an incumbent democrat in the senate. I didn't vote for anyone crazy just for the sake of change.

This state would have had a republican governor, if it wasn't for one very large democratic county. The republican lost by 1%

I don't know how this will play out. Hopefully a little more balance in power.From the start, I've liked what the new, soon to be, house speaker has to say.


http://www.nationaljournal.com/membe...rnors-20101129

lol

well played you xob