The Cellar - The Hobbit.

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)

- Arts & Entertainment (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=6)

- - The Hobbit. (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=28325)

I just saw the trailer for the Hobbit. And I thought that I knew the Hobbit And I saw a character that I did not recognize.

huh. Tolkein's books just came out on Audible. I just bought the Hobbit and started re reading it. The narrator is awesome. like a kids story reader. so comfy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fargon (Post 839753)

I just saw the trailer for the Hobbit. And I thought that I knew the Hobbit And I saw a character that I did not recognize.

Okay, I'm obsessed with figuring this out.

Watched these two trailers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOGsB9dORBg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=...ture=endscreen

If you mean "a dark power has found a way back into the world" that's Radagast the Brown.

On IMDB, it looks like Dain (Thorin's cousin), Beorn (the bear guy), Tom (I assume Tom Bombadil), Bolg (leader of the goblins in the Battle of the Five Armies) are cast.

You might mean "Net Mender" or "Alfrid" --two inhabitants of Laketown apparently created for the film: the guy who sees Smaug coming, and a "conniving civil servant, " respectively.

Could it have been any of these?

Or, do you have a link to the trailer? I must see this character.

There's a new female elf character. I don't know if she's in the trailer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey (Post 839781)

There's a new female elf character. I don't know if she's in the trailer.

I think they let them out of the trailer once a day, to feed.

Yes, they've created some brand new characters. The Necromancer was named in the book, but never appeared. They've put in Galadriel, Saruman, and it looks like they've expanded King Thranduil's role, if his high place in the cast listing is any indication. They list the character Elros, I don't believe he was even mentioned in the book.

Splitting The Hobbit into 3 parts is just a money grab.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 839771)

Okay, I'm obsessed with figuring this out.

Watched these two trailers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOGsB9dORBg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=...ture=endscreen

How about all of them stitched together?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 839822)

Splitting The Hobbit into 3 parts is just a money grab.

No, friend, no...you couldn't tell this story in two hours!

15 minutes would suffice, really.

Yeah, but with no trolls, no Tom Bombadil, no Beorn, etc.

I can see I need to renew my Pacific Science Center membership so I can get priority for tickets to see this in IMAX. Whoa.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimhelm (Post 839754)

huh. Tolkein's books just came out on Audible. I just bought the Hobbit and started re reading it. The narrator is awesome. like a kids story reader. so comfy.

That must have been done on the sly by Dads then.

He brought me home The Lord of the Rings because I loved reading and it was the largest book he'd ever seen. I was 9-10, he worked as a printer (yes, it was half-inched from the re-pulp bin).

Then for my twelth birthday (well, just an excuse really) I got a Commodore 64 and The Hobbit as a game. My 8 year old bro was obsessed with it, but simply couldn't fathom it out. So his bedtime reading became The Hobbit - my dyslexic father making up the names he couldn't work out. He read me fairy stories in the same way.

I was hugely jealous at the time because Tolkien (and Daddy) were MINE. But I got over it very quickly and Ste now works in IT in London on a very healthy wage, so it all worked out okay.

Haven't read The Hobbit in years. Spose I should get prepared - Mum won't want to see it and Dad will. Yay - I get Dads all to myself again!

Flint, Happy Monkey, here's one for you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 839930)

No, friend, no...you couldn't tell this story in two hours!

Ok, two movies. The book was only 250ish pages, IIRC. LOTR was more like 1300.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 839939)

Yeah, but with no trolls, no Tom Bombadil, no Beorn, etc.

Tom Bombadil was in The Fellowship of the Ring, not the Hobbit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 839956)

Ok, two movies. The book was only 250ish pages, IIRC. LOTR was more like 1300..

Yes, but an unabridged reading of a 250 page book is something like 12 hours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 839956)

Tom Bombadil was in The Fellowship of the Ring, not the Hobbit.

Oops, you're right--then "Tom" is one of the trolls, along with Bert and Bill.

Anyways my point was, everybody I know who is a Tolkien fan, when we heard it was being done in 3 movies, we all had the same reaction-- "Awesome, they are taking the time to do it right!" We were all very excited, and this was seen as nothing but a positive.

You're actually the first person I've heard saying it is a "money grab" and it took me by surprise, as the idea had never even begun to cross my mind. Is this because you are jaded to the industry in general, or do you have a problem with Peter Jackson specifically?

Wasn't there already a hobbit movie? Lord of the Rings wasn't about hobbits? Or was it Harry Potter? I'm so confused.

Those are the dudes with hairy feet, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 842430)

You're actually the first person I've heard saying it is a "money grab" and it took me by surprise, as the idea had never even begun to cross my mind. Is this because you are jaded to the industry in general, or do you have a problem with Peter Jackson specifically?

Neither.

I've read The Hobbit and LOTR probably 7 or 8 times. I don't like it when a movie is different from a book. My feeling is that in order to extend the story to fill out three movies, they added stuff. I know they added characters, and put Galadriel in. The Hobbit is complete as written.

With Jackson's LotR, I loved the visuals, tolerated a lot of the editing ... but couldn't stand the dumbing down. The confrontations between Gandalf and Saruman in particular were just made silly.

The Hobbit shouldn't suffer from that problem. It was always a bit of a fun children's story, I think it could turn out fine. Having seen Jackson's Balrog*, I'm looking forward to see his Smaug.

*no, that is NOT what the kids are calling it nowdays. ;)

P.S. IM, one more blasphemy from you and you're getting the dunking stool, capice?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 842454)

I've read The Hobbit and LOTR probably 7 or 8 times. I don't like it when a movie is different from a book. My feeling is that in order to extend the story to fill out three movies, they added stuff. I know they added characters, and put Galadriel in. The Hobbit is complete as written.

But you're ignoring every book that's ever been made into a movie, since forever. In order to make 1 book into 1 movie, you have to cut out more than half of the book in order to make it fit in the time allotted. So how do you avoid cutting stuff out of the book? By allowing more time. Allowing enough time to tell the whole story--something which is never done when they make a book into a movie.

This may be the first time this has ever been done right.

I think the Harry Potter films were very close.

Because kids (like I was) know the books, and aren't too polite to make their views known when the film gets it WRONG!

I heard the Hobbit movie is going to be 'darker' - Stephen Colbert explained it beautifully to Peter Jackson who said Colbert knew more about Hobbit/LoTR than he did.

The only film I've ever thought was better than the book was Bridget Jones.
I didn't mind the changes because they used silly rom-com cliches instead of silly chick-lit cliches. And I didn't find the book all that memorable anyway.

I don't go to the flicks much any more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint (Post 842505)

I agree that two movies are necessary. Cut it when the hobbits are captured by the elves, maybe.

we're all going to see the Hobbit on Christmas day.

Past two X-mas' we saw the Sherlock Holmes movies.

Hobbit will be way more fun.

Here's my quick breakdown of required plot points and length in minutes

Party 30
Trollshalls 20
Rivendell 10
Over/through mountains 20
Riddle game 40
Down mountain/eagle rescue 5
Beorn 10
Mirkwood travel 10
Spiders 10
Capture/captive of elves 15
Down river/laketown 15
Lonely mountain/Smaug 30
Battle of 5 armies 30
Trip home 5
Balin visit 5
total 255

That's 4.25 hours of movie. Even two 3 hour movies would probably be enough.

JRR was not as detailed in The Hobbit as he was in LOTR. For instance, here is the entire trip from The Shire to Trollshalls

Quote:

They had not been riding very long when up came Gandalf very
splendid on a white horse. He had brought a lot of pocket-handkerchiefs,
- 27 -
and Bilbo’s pipe and tobacco. So after that the party went along very
merrily, and they told stories or sang songs as they rode forward all day,
except of course when they stopped for meals. These didn’t come quite
as often as Bilbo would have liked them, but still he began to feel that
adventures were not so bad after all. At first they had passed through
hobbit-lands, a wild respectable country inhabited by decent folk, with
good roads, an inn or two, and now and then a dwarf or a farmer ambling
by on business. Then they came to lands where people spoke strangely,
and sang songs Bilbo had never heard before. Now they had gone on far
into the Lone-lands, where there were no people left, no inns, and the
roads grew steadily worse. Not far ahead were dreary hills, rising higher
and higher, dark with trees. On some of them were old castles with an evil
look, as if they had been built by wicked people. Everything seemed gloomy,
for the weather that day had taken a nasty turn. Mostly it had been as
good as May can be, even in merry tales, but now it was cold and wet. In
the Lone-lands they had to camp when they could, but at least it had
been dry. “To think it will soon be June,” grumbled Bilbo as he splashed
along behind the others in a very muddy track. It was after tea-time; it
was pouring with rain, and had been all day; his hood was dripping into
his eyes, his cloak was full of water; the pony was tired and stumbled on
stones; the others were too grumpy to talk. “And I’m sure the rain has got
into the dry clothes and into the food-bags,” thought Bilbo. “Bother burgling
and everything to do with it! I wish I was at home in my nice hole by the
fire, with the kettle just beginning to sing!” It was not the last time that he
wished that!
Still the dwarves jogged on, never turning round or taking any
notice of the hobbit. Somewhere behind the grey clouds the sun must
have gone down, for it began to get dark. Wind got up, and the willows
along the river-bank bent and sighed. I don’t know what river it was, a
rushing red one, swollen with the rains of the last few days, that came
down from the hills and mountains in front of them. Soon it was nearly
dark. The winds broke up the grey clouds, and a waning moon appeared
above the hills between the flying rags. Then they stopped, and Thorin
muttered something about supper, “and where shall we get a dry patch to
sleep on?” Not until then did they notice that Gandalf was missing. So far
he had come all the way with them, never saying if he was in the adventure
or merely keeping them company for a while. He had eaten most, talked
most, and laughed most. But now he simply was not there at all!
“Just when a wizard would have been most useful, too,” groaned
Dori and Nori (who shared the hobbit’s views about regular meals, plenty
and often). They decided in the end that they would have to camp where
they were. So far they had not camped before on this journey, and though
- 28 -
they knew that they soon would have to camp regularly, when they were
among the Misty Mountains and far from the lands of respectable people,
it seemed a bad wet evening to begin, on. They moved to a clump of
trees, and though it was drier under them, the wind shook the rain off the
leaves, and the drip, drip, was most annoying. Also the mischief seemed
to have got into the fire. Dwarves can make a fire almost anywhere out of
almost anything, wind or no wind; but they could not do it that night, not
even Oin and Gloin, who were specially good at it.
Then one of the ponies took fright at nothing and bolted. He got
into the river before they could catch him; and before they could get him
out again, Fili and Kili were nearly drowned, and all the baggage that he
carried was washed away off him. Of course it was mostly food, and there
was mighty little left for supper, and less for breakfast. There they all sat
glum and wet and muttering, while Oin and Gloin went on trying to light
the fire, and quarrelling about it. Bilbo was sadly reflecting that adventures
are not all pony-rides in May-sunshine, when Balin, who was always their
look-out man, said: “There’s a light over there!” There was a hill some
way off with trees on it, pretty thick in parts. Out of the dark mass of the
trees they could now see a light shining, a reddish comfortable-looking
light, as it might be a fire or torches twinkling.

Here's the entire Rivendell stay

“

Quote:

Hrnmm! it smells like elves!” thought Bilbo, and he looked up at
the stars. They were burning bright and blue. Just then there came a
burst of song like laughter in the trees:
- 38 -
(song)
So they laughed and sang in the trees; and pretty fair nonsense I
daresay you think it. Not that they would care they would only laugh all
the more if you told them so. They were elves of course. Soon Bilbo
caught glimpses of them as the darkness deepened. He loved elves, though
he seldom met them; but he was a little frightened of them too. Dwarves
don’t get on well with them. Even decent enough dwarves like Thorin and
his friends think them foolish (which is a very foolish thing to think), or
get annoyed with them. For some elves tease them and laugh at them,
and most of all at their beards.
- 39 -
“Well, well!” said a voice. “Just look! Bilbo the hobbit on a pony, my
dear! Isn’t it delicious!”
“Most astonishing wonderful!”
Then off they went into another song as ridiculous as the one I
have written down in full. At last one, a tall young fellow, came out from
the trees and bowed to Gandalf and to Thorin.
“Welcome to the valley!” he said.
“Thank you!” said Thorin a bit gruffly; but Gandalf was already off
his horse and among the elves, talking merrily with them.
“You are a little out of your way,” said the elf: “that is, if you are
making for the only path across the water and to the house beyond. We
will set you right, but you had best get on foot, until you are over the
bridge. Are you going to stay a bit and sing with us, or will you go straight
on? Supper is preparing over there,” he said. “I can smell the Wood-fires
for the cooking.”
Tired as he was, Bilbo would have liked to stay awhile. Elvish singing
is not a thing to miss, in June under the stars, not if you care for such
things. Also he would have liked to have a few private words with these
people that seemed to know his name and all about him, although he had
never been them before. He thought their opinion of his adventure might
be interesting. Elves know a lot and are wondrous folk for news, and
know what is going on among the peoples of the land, as quick as water
flows, or quicker. But the dwarves were all for supper as soon ‘as possible
just then, and would not stay. On they all went, leading their ponies, till
they were brought to a good path and so at last to the very brink of the
river. It was flowing fast and noisily, as mountain-streams do of a summer
evening, when sun has been all day on the snow far up above. There was
only a narrow bridge of stone without a parapet, as narrow as a pony
could well walk on; and over that they had to go, slow and careful, one by
one, each leading his pony by the bridle. The elves had brought bright
lanterns to the shore, and they sang a merry song as the party went
across.
“Don’t dip your beard in the foam, father!” they cried to Thorin,
who was bent almost on to his hands and knees. “It is long enough
without watering it.”
“Mind Bilbo doesn’t eat all the cakes!” they called. “He is too fat to
get through key-holes yet!”
“Hush, hush! Good People! and good night!” said Gandalf, who
came last. “Valleys have ears, and some elves have over merry tongues.
Good night!”
And so at last they all came to the Last Homely House, and found
its doors flung wide.
- 40 -
Now it is a strange thing, but things that are good to have and days
that are good to spend are soon told about, and not much to listen to;
while things that are uncomfortable, palpitating, and even gruesome, may
make a good tale, and take a deal of telling anyway. They stayed long in
that good house, fourteen days at least, and they found it hard to leave.
Bilbo would gladly have stopped there for ever and ever-even supposing
a wish would have taken him right back to his hobbit-hole without trouble.
Yet there is little to tell about their stay.
The master of the house was an elf-friend-one of those people
whose fathers came into the strange stories before the beginning of History,
the wars of the evil goblins and the elves and the first men in the North.
In those days of our tale there were still some people who had both elves
and heroes of the North for ancestors, and Elrond the master of the house
was their chief. He was as noble and as fair in face as an elf-lord, as
strong as a warrior, as wise as a wizard, as venerable as a king of dwarves,
and as kind as summer. He comes into. many tales, but his part in the
story of Bilbo’s great adventure is only a small one, though important, as
you will see, if we ever get to the end of it. His house was perfect, whether
you liked food, or sleep, or work, or story-telling, or singing, or just sitting
and thinking best, or a pleasant mixture of them all. Evil things did not
come into that valley.
I wish I had time to tell you even a few of the tales or one or two of
the songs that they heard in that house. All of them, the ponies as well,
grew refreshed and strong in a few days there. Their clothes were mended
as well as their bruises, their tempers and their hopes. Their bags were
filled with food and provisions light to carry but strong to bring them over
the mountain passes. Their plans were improved with the best advice. So
the time came to mid- summer eve, and they were to go on again with the
early sun on midsummer morning.
Elrond knew all about runes of every kind. That day he looked at
the swords they had brought from the trolls’ lair, and he said: “These are
not troll-make. They are old swords, very old swords of the High Elves of
the West, my kin. They were made in Gondolin for the Goblin-wars. They
must have come from a dragon’s hoard or goblin plunder, for dragons and
goblins destroyed that city many ages ago. This, Thorin, the runes name
Orcrist, the Goblin-cleaver in the ancient tongue of Gondolin; it was a
famous blade. This, Gandalf, was Glamdring, Foe-hammer that the king
of Gondolin once wore. Keep them well!”
“Whence did the trolls get them, I wonder?” said Thorin looking at
his sword with new interest.
“I could not say,” said Elrond, “but one may guess that your trolls
had plundered other plunderers, or come on the remnants of old robberies
- 41 -
in some hold in the mountains of the North. I have heard that there are
still forgotten treasures of old to be found in the deserted caverns of the
mines of Moria, since the dwarf and goblin war.”
Thorin pondered these words. “I will keep this sword in honour,” he
said. “May it soon cleave goblins once again!”
“A wish that is likely to be granted soon enough in the mountains!”
said Elrond. “But show me now your map!” He took it and gazed long at
it, and he shook his head; for if he did not altogether approve of dwarves
and their love of gold, he hated dragons and their cruel wickedness, and
he grieved to remember the ruin of the town of Dale and its merry bells,
and the burned banks of the bright River Running. The moon was shining
in a broad silver crescent. He held up the map and the white light shone
through it. “What is this?” he said. “There are moon-letters here, beside
the plain runes which say ‘five feet high the door and three may walk
abreast.’ “
“What are moon-letters?” asked the hobbit full of excitement. He
loved maps, as I have told you before; and he also liked runes and letters
and cunning handwriting, though when he wrote himself it was a bit thin
and spidery.
“Moon-letters are rune-letters, but you cannot see them,” said Elrond,
“not when you look straight at them. They can only be seen when the
moon shines behind them, and what is more, with the more cunning sort
it must be a moon of the same shape and season as the day when they
were written. The dwarves invented them and wrote them with silver
pens, as your friends could tell you. These must have been written on a
midsummer’s eve in a crescent moon, a long while ago.”
“What do they say?” asked Gandalf and Thorin together, a bit vexed
perhaps that even Elrond should have found this out first, though really
there had not been a chance before, and there would not have been
another until goodness knows when.
“Stand by the grey stone when the thrush knocks,” read Elrond,
“and the setting sun with the last light of Durin’s Day will shine upon the
key-hole.”
“Durin, Durin!” said Thorin. “He was the father of the fathers of the
eldest race of Dwarves, the Longbeards, and my first ancestor: I am his
heir.”
“Then what is Durin’s Day?” asked Elrond.
“The first day of the dwarves’ New Year,” said Thorin, “is as all
should know the first, day of the last moon of Autumn on the threshold of
Winter. We still call it Durin’s Day when the last moon of Autumn and the
sun are in the sky together. But this will not help us much, I fear, for it
passes our skill in these days to guess when such a time will come again.”
- 42 -
“That remains to be seen,” said Gandalf. “Is there any more writing?”
“None to be seen by this moon,” said Elrond, and he gave the map
back to Thorin; and then they went down to the water to see the elves
dance and sing upon the midsummer’s eve.
The next morning was a midsummer’s morning as fair and fresh as
could be dreamed: blue sky and never a cloud, and the sun dancing on
the water. Now they rode away amid songs of farewell and good speed,
with their hearts ready for more adventure, and with a knowledge of the
road they must follow over the Misty Mountains to the land beyond.

Well, it was written as a children's book. I think Tolkien edited his writing with that in mind. LOTR was aimed at adults and was meant to be a 'really long story' - his stated objective was to write such a story and see if people would remain interested. The Hobbit is far simpler in its construction and narration; I think two movies would do it, myself, and stay true to the book. I wish they wouldn't bring in characters who weren't in the book, just to link to LOTR. That's for the admittedly vast audience who hasn't read any of the books but likes the movies, and will want to see some connection between the stories.

Meh, I say. Read the books, folks!

Quote:

Originally Posted by orthodoc (Post 842623)

Meh, I say. Read the books, folks!

Bingo!

Never judge a book by it's movie. http://cellar.org/2012/nono.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 842610)

I agree that two movies are necessary. Cut it when the hobbits are captured by the elves, maybe.

:eyebrow:

It's been a while since you read it, hasn't it. ;)

Hang on, that sounds reasonable to me too.
They're caught by spiders and then imprisoned by elves in Mirkwood.

Although it means all the exposition is in film one and all the flashy stuff (SMAUG!) is in film two.

But I admit - it has been a while since I read it.

Dwarves. And one hobbit. ;)

I loved the book as a Kid , and i'm looking forward to the movie ,
So they add a bit here or there or crop a bit ,
so what , i bet it will be a great flick(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum (Post 842729)

:eyebrow:

It's been a while since you read it, hasn't it. ;)

D'oh! :smack:

OK. Here's the bird's eye low-down on this caper. Yesterday I heard an interview with a "Tolkien Scholar". He was asked if the movie seemed "stretched", in order to fill out three movies. He said that Jackson has incorporated goings-on in Middle Earth that happened during the time that The Hobbit takes place, but were not included in the story. He got them from the LOTR appendices (probably The Tale Of Years). Off hand, I remember that Gandalf's reason for leaving the company at Mirkwood was that he met with The White Council, who subsequently drove The Necromancer out of Dol Guldor. This would explain Galadriel's and Saruman's inclusion in the movies.

Having learned this, I'm all in for 3 movies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 843771)

Awesome! I can't wait.

When I heard it was in three parts, I automatically assumed that Peter Jackson was going to fill in the story by fleshing out events that were known to have happened at that time. I think I even said to Pooka something about I hope they show us what Gandalf was doing when he went off on his business. The best thing about Tolkein's world is that there is no guesswork--somehwere in his other works the details are recorded.

Last night Pooka and I were discussing how they might break the story into three parts. As we have already seen Gollum in the trailers, I assume the first movie gets them to under the mountain. That leaves the wolves, eagles, Beorn, Mirkwood, the spiders, the capture by elves, escape and barrel ride, Laketown, investigating the mountain, Smaug, killing Smaug, showdown at the Dwarves stronghold, and the battle of the five armies.

SonofV and I have tickets to The Hobbit. Tonight's the final night for the film's run at The Cinerama. It's an **awesome** theater. And this presentation is the superduper one, 3D, 48 fps, wiiiiidescreen (but not IMAX). I'll let you know how it turns out!

Ripley and I saw it in 3d. Didn't really make it better....except the theater was empty, so that was cool. I wanted the glasses off about half way through, but then it was fuzzy

Cool.

Just for grins, I'm posting this from the bus--connected to the free on board wifi.

Humph.
Turns out Dad did NOT want to see The Hobbit. Well, at least not with me. I asked three times than stopped because I could tell he was getting cross.

And both the 'rents went to see Les Mis without me.
Despite knowing I wanted to see it, following the conversation "Are you really going to see it without me?". Mum having had apparently forgotten that I was the one who paid for them the see the stage show - seats in the Stalls thank you very much - and have seen it about ten times myself. "I didn't think you'd want to see it," she said duplicitously.

haven't seen Les Miz, but I hear it's beautifully grim. I hope your Mum wasn't shutting you out to be mean to you. :(

***

The Hobbit was *gorgeous*. SonofV wanted to sit in the balcony. We were the first in the theater, and had the place to ourselves for fifteen minutes or so. Eventually another twenty-five people came in. It's a big theater. Why two other couples decided that they had to sit almost directly adjacent to us is a mystery.

Anyhow, it was truly beautiful, I wonder how much of the scenery is real and how much is CGI

Nah, she is proud of me at the moment. She just wanted to go at a time when they could use their Senior Discount. It bugged me but I can understand it.

Wish I'd got to see The Hobbit with Dad though.
I expect most of the scenery is real. My Aunt is a Kiwi. The place is breathtaking.

:lol: That was great!

that was great!

I saw a show that explored parts of where they filmed the Hobbit and it didn't look like they CGI'd anything. They went to the hilly, river-y places and they all looked just as they did in the movie. Of course the elvish castle in Rivendale in CGI but the surrounding scenery was right there.

RE: les mis. I saw the play and loved it and then saw the movie and was depressed for three days having PTSD for people who never existed!
Twas so sad once I could understand what everyone was singing about (we had balcony seats at the play and i didn't know the music so a lot was lost on me)

xoB, that was F*CKING AWES*ME!!

Saw it last night on a second run screen. The print was slightly damaged. It was good but Bilbo's transformation wasn't nearly as impressive as what I remember in the book. I think too much weight was placed on the action sequences, which were hard to stay immersed in. That said, I'm in for all three and will watch it again on a better screen.

We hates it! We hates it forever!

I just saw it on DVD. It's just out from Netflix.

What a pile of rubbish. Too much changed. Ripped out bits. Added unnecessary backstory. The dwarves are made out to be complete pigs. The list goes on.

As much as I love The Hobbit and LotR, I not sure I'll bother to see the second half. I certainly won't pay to see it in the theaters.