![]() |
religion of peace update
Quote:
well as long as we are all clear about where we stand in their eyes, i guess it's ok. |
Gotta love those fringe types!
|
what? a group hug won't solve our problems? alright then, somebody's gotta die - who's it going to be?
|
How come somebody always has to die? I know! Let's round up all the members of al-Qa'ida along with George Jr. and subject them all to a rigorous cult-deprogramming. All wash-outs from the school will be sent to Antartica to put radio collars on Emperor penguins under the close scrutiny of armed ornithologists. ;)
|
forceful cult deprogramming may result in kidnapping charges. that is no good.
a good shooting can always be handled with a number of defenses such as " i was insane, i swear", "i was just cleaning it and it just went off" or "he attacked me - i had no choice but to shoot him until i had emptied all 3 clips, reloaded, and emptied them again before i slowly drove over him with a steam roller." and besides, isn't it just good old clean american fun to kill the enemy? :D |
More often, we sent them foreign aid and military hardware. :(
|
You know, you could change about 5 words in there and it'd fit nicely from a christian fundie. Same probably applies to a hindu fundie as well but I've got less experience with them.
I think but OBL et al in a big cage with the entire administration and put in PPV, the world would not only be safer but damn, it'd make a killing. If you staged the event underground somewhere afterwards you could go round, collect everyone's WMD and let them all off in there. The nukes would neutralize the bio and chem weapons and make the whole site a shrine the peace. |
I wish it was that simple, Jag. :thumpsup:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
??? show me. i've not heard too many christian fundamentalists advocating killing all who don't believe. "civilians and noncivilians, innocents and noninnocents..." nope, haven't anything close to that. |
Well, Islam is a couple of hundred years younger than Christianity.
|
those darn wipper-snappers. can't wait til they get a little older and quit trying to kill us all.
seriously though, this isn't about islam. it is about wahabbists. |
Quote:
Islamic fundamentalists are no more muslim than fundamentalist christians are christian, both twist scripture to suit their own twisted view and neither are representative of their religions on the whole. You lost any gravity you had as soon as you said 'religion of peace', as to imply they represented Islam on the whole. |
Quote:
and while we are at it, how many "christians" advocate using murder as a tool to win people over? now how many wahabbists, or other radical muslims are killing those they disagree with? neither one is better than the other, but don't even pretend to compare the two. |
|
yep, there are dipshits everywhere. but how many? we all know there are wackjobs, but they are kept in check like the idiot cousin who is never let out of his room.
these are not large scale movements. if these folks decided to get moving on their convictions, they would get picked off by a couple of good old boys. |
Quote:
|
And your point in sharing an illiterate website that nobody takes seriously is?
(these are the same guys that present godhatesfags.com) |
Quote:
|
Bush has a fairly extreme view, at least compared to most christians I know. When people start talking about the will of god, the path of god or think they are in any way assisted by god to their position it's time to start worrying. The guy bought in ashcroft for crying out loud, he's expanded government funding of faith based charities.
How many fundamentalists disagree with the views of OBL et al? Fair few, Some of them have died for it, might want to look into the views of a recently assassinated pakistani cleric for example. Not that you'd bother to research that before spouting off tired old lines. Both groups are dipshits, both groups are fairly small, both groups are warped views of their religion. Neither is better than the other. |
Quote:
um, what? glad to see you were able to keep the hatchet buried and avoid getting personal, btw. |
Quote:
i think the difficulty here is that when you say bush has an extreme view you are comparing him to everyone who calls themelves a christian. for a lot of people that simply means "yeah, when i grew up we went to the local church on christmas and easter." Bush claims to be an active christian, it is an integral part of his everyday life. when he is compared with other practicing christians; those that actually have a very personal, christ-based faith - he is not an extremist as you assert. i don't see any evidence to indicate that these individuals are out promoting death to all muslims, gays, abortion doctors, or anything like that. what you are trying to lump bush in with is more similar to a cult. like the branch davidians, or the nut jobs that TS provided the link for. they have taken an idea or a few sentences from the bible and built an entirely new faith from it. that is similar to the wahabbi strain of islam. to throw evangelical christians into the same bag is pretty ridiculous. so to answer you Jag - yeah, one is better than the other. the group that doesn't advocate mass extermination of anyone who disagrees wins in my book. |
First things first, your original quote implies that killing people/terrorism is a means to an end, not mass extermination of all non-beleivers, small difference but an important one. What they are saying is they have a goal and they will kill anyone that gets in the way. I don't see how that is even the slightest bit different to for example, abortion clinic bombers.
Avoid getting personal? Avoid digging up tired old lines that are frankly, insulting to every muslim. That line implies that all muslims are basically terrorists and the faith cannot exist in a more peaceful form, if that's not what you mean, don't use it. Why include bush? He called the war on terror a crusade, the way he talks about god, it's clear he sees himself of some kind of religious mission. The original name for retaliation was 'Operating Infinite Justice' for crying out loud, it is clear that he views this in a way that to me at least, suggests a certain extremity in his view. |
Man Dodges Suicide Pact with Bride (yahoo news)
Mon Jul 12, 8:21 AM ET TEHRAN (Reuters) - An Iranian man who struck a suicide pact with his new bride over their guilt for having pre-marital sex is being held by police after he backed out on his side of the bargain, judiciary officials said on Sunday. The couple, who were not named, had been married for just two days when, "due to their guilty consciences for having illicit sexual relations, they decided to kill each other at the same time," the official said. The man helped to hang his wife but then changed his mind about killing himself and handed himself in to police in the northeastern Khorasan province, the official told the ISNA student news agency. Pre-marital sex is taboo in the Islamic state where some girls have to go through a virginity test before tying knot. |
Quote:
|
This whole thread is whacked on so many different levels it makes my mind boggle.
1) I'm fairly sure that even my sixth and seventh grade daughters would have sense enough to avoid undertaking a serious discussion base on an anattributed quote. 2) Even if the text is an accurate quote from a real person, I very much doubt that his/her views represent the mainstream Muslim (which is what seems to be implied). 3) The web site that TroubleShooter posted is no more representative of the average Christian fundamentalist than the Muslim quote was. No good can come from this. |
marichiko... heh I agree with you... and on a side note. hey we agree to disagree right? that's what a bulk of this forum is for? right?
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.