The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Did you think the Episcopal Church was liberal? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=7189)

SteveDallas 11-09-2004 03:38 PM

Did you think the Episcopal Church was liberal?
 
Apparently their alleged liberalism does not extend to having druids amongst their priesthood.

glatt 11-09-2004 03:50 PM

Well, you have to draw the line somewhere.

I can see the thinkng now... "Women priests? OK. Gay bishops? OK. Druids leading the christian services? Ummmm, nah. That's too much."

Elspode 11-09-2004 04:19 PM

You've got to ferret out those filthy Pagans wherever you find them, you know. Hell, this is the Episcopalian version of the CIA being infiltrated by Al Qaeda.

wolf 11-10-2004 12:43 AM

I was very amused by the story, particularly given that pagans allow quite a bit of latitude in terms of which of the multiplicity of dieties one chooses to worship, however, the converse is not true of the Episcopal Church of the United States, or of the Anglican Communion in general. I seem to recall a recent article about two British Anglican Bishops having to give up their membership in a British Druidic Order. I'm still looking for that one, but here's BBC article about the induction in August 2002.

Edited to add

As I was doing some additional searching for the article about the resignation from the druid order, I stumbled across something far better ... The Good Dr. Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, Honorary White Druid, apparently gave approval for a new version of the bible, called Good as New.

I think I have to get one now, if it is anything close to what's described in the article.

Quote:

The KJV translation of Matthew 26:69-70 reads: "Now Peter sat without in the palace: and a damsel came unto him, saying, 'Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.' But he denied before them all, saying, I know not what thou sayest."

The "Good as New" version?

"Meanwhile Rocky was still sitting in the courtyard. A woman came up to him and said: 'Haven't I seen you with Jesus, the hero from Galilee?" Rocky shook his head and said: 'I don't know what the hell you're talking about!'"

Happy Monkey 11-10-2004 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf
... pagans allow quite a bit of latitude in terms of which of the multiplicity of dieties one chooses to worship, however, the converse is not true of the Episcopal Church of the United States, or of the Anglican Communion in general.

Um... Or of the entire Christian community in general? Or any of the monotheistic religions? Isn't "you shall worship no other gods before me" pretty much universally interpreted "you shall worship no other gods because they don't exist"?

tw 11-10-2004 08:39 AM

Why don't evangelicals ask, "How many times did Christ get laid?" After all, it is a religious experience.

alphageek31337 11-10-2004 09:50 AM

HM: If you pay attention to the Old Testament, Yahweh pretty much makes himself the one God of the Jews, then sets out to prove that he has a bigger dick than all the other Gods in the area. In Genesis, it is worth noting that Cain, having slain Abel, is cast out to the land of Nod where he takes a wife of a tribe of people not created by Yahweh. Later on, in Exodus (I believe), Moses sees the burning bush, and asks what God it actually is, because there are a bunch of them (the Jews being polytheists at the time, but having a different Canon than the enslaving Egyptians). That is, of course, if you take the whole book as rock-hard fact, rather than a series of cool stories that can teach us a lot if you focus less on the slaying of the iniquitous and such...

Happy Monkey 11-10-2004 10:14 AM

I know that, I probably should have phrased it like this:

Isn't "you shall worship no other gods before me" pretty much universally interpreted these days as "you shall worship no other gods because they don't exist"?

I.E. I don't think you could find many, if any, current monotheistic religions that would accept a polytheist as clergy, even if they acknowlege that that religion's God is "the best".

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 10:14 AM

Quote:

In Genesis, it is worth noting that Cain, having slain Abel, is cast out to the land of Nod where he takes a wife of a tribe of people not created by Yahweh.
Amplified Bible:
Quote:

16So Cain went away from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod [wandering], east of Eden.
17And Cain's wife [one of Adam's offspring] became pregnant and bore Enoch; and Cain built a [6] city and named it after his son Enoch.


Quote:

Moses sees the burning bush, and asks what God it actually is, because there are a bunch of them
Amplified Bible:
Quote:

3And Moses said, I will now turn aside and see this great sight, why the bush is not burned.
4And when the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called to him out of the midst of the bush and said, Moses, Moses! And he said, Here am I.
5God said, Do not come near; put your shoes off your feet, for the place on which you stand is holy ground.
6Also He said, I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God.
NIV:
Quote:

3 So Moses thought, "I will go over and see this strange sight-why the bush does not burn up."
4 When the LORD saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, "Moses! Moses!"
And Moses said, "Here I am."
5 "Do not come any closer," God said. "Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground." 6 Then he said, "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob." At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God.
No where does Moses ask which God it is.

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
Isn't "you shall worship no other gods before me" pretty much universally interpreted these days as "you shall worship no other gods because they don't exist"?

There are two ways I've heard it interpreted:

(1) There are other gods named in the bible (Baal comes immediately to mind)

(2) "Gods" can be interpreted to mean money, alcohol, drugs, anything that you put before God.

And this whole "good as new" bible version is ludicrous. (?sp)

wolf 11-10-2004 11:22 AM

That's why I have to have one.

I was raised on Douay, and personal preference is for King James.

Troubleshooter 11-10-2004 11:27 AM

Wasn't there a version of the Ten Commandments(tm) that was done in ebonics floating around a while back?

alphageek31337 11-10-2004 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnyxCougar
Amplified Bible:






Amplified Bible:


NIV:


No where does Moses ask which God it is.

Because in these books, the bush is quick to point out that it is the god of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, etc. Essentially, pointing out that it is the God of the Jews.

"Moses said to God, 'So I will go to the Israelites and say, 'Your fathers' God sent me to you.' They will immediately ask me what His name is. What shall I say to them?'
'I Will Be Who I Will Be,' replied God to Moses."

Exodus 3:13-14, as translated at bible.ort.org

"So, what's your name anyway?"
"Uh.....I'm me!"

Cyber Wolf 11-10-2004 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnyxCougar
...

Amplified Bible:
17And Cain's wife [one of Adam's offspring] became pregnant and bore Enoch; and Cain built a [6] city and named it after his son Enoch.

Ewww! Incest! :3eye:

wolf 11-10-2004 11:48 AM

Isn't that how Noah and his family (and all the animals) got fruitful and multiplied also? That genetic diversity thing must have gotten totally out of hand by Noah's time and had to be STOPPED.

Given that the ark can be regarded as a kind of an RV ... does that make all of mankind trailer trash?

Cyber Wolf 11-10-2004 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf
Isn't that how Noah and his family (and all the animals) got fruitful and multiplied also?

No wonder so many humans are just plain funny-lookin'. :gray:

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 12:15 PM

Yup! That's how it was at the time... All the YECs think so.

And You Should Too! [tm]

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphageek31337
Because in these books, the bush is quick to point out that it is the god of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, etc. Essentially, pointing out that it is the God of the Jews.

And the God of his parents.

Quote:

"Moses said to God, 'So I will go to the Israelites and say, 'Your fathers' God sent me to you.' They will immediately ask me what His name is. What shall I say to them?'
'I Will Be Who I Will Be,' replied God to Moses."

Exodus 3:13-14, as translated at bible.ort.org

"So, what's your name anyway?"
"Uh.....I'm me!"

Amplified Bible:
Quote:

13And Moses said to God, Behold, when I come to the Israelites and say to them, The God of your fathers has sent me to you, and they say to me, What is His name? What shall I say to them?
14And God said to Moses, I AM WHO I AM and WHAT I AM, and I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE; and He said, You shall say this to the Israelites: I AM has sent me to you!
15God said also to Moses, This shall you say to the Israelites: The Lord, the God of your fathers, of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, has sent me to you! This is My [3] name forever, and by this name I am to be remembered to all generations.
Moses is not asking God what his name is. Moses is asking God what he should tell the Israelites his name is. Are you aware of how many names God has in Hebrew? It's alot.

"So who do you want me to tell them you are?"
"I yam who I yam and that's all that I yam."

In the text, it does not seem Moses is confused as to who God is, just that he doesn't know what to tell the peeps at home when they ask what he's been smokin.

alphageek31337 11-10-2004 12:35 PM

Also, the only thing I've been able to find in Genesis on Cain reproducing has a pretty abrupt jump:

"Cain went to the land of Nod, East of Eden. And Cain knew his wife."

No mention of other people created by God, no mention of the incestuous relationship that must have developed if these people weren't created by God and, therefore in the mind of biblical literalists, didn't exist. Incest being a sin/abomination against God/a bad idea, where did the rest of us come from? Where does it mention that Enoch's mom is actually Cain's sister? Or were there other people on earth and Yahweh is just the creator-god of the Jews?

Whereas if you take the book as an allegory, a collection of really cool stories that give you a pretty good example of how to live, then it all makes perfect sense.

That being said, there is no more intimidating a phrase, when introducing yourself, than "I am sent by the one who is called 'I Am'." Pure biblical bad-ass, in that Samuel L Jackson Pulp Fiction/Boondock Saints prayer sense.

Elspode 11-10-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphageek31337
Incest being a sin/abomination against God/a bad idea, where did the rest of us come from? Where does it mention that Enoch's mom is actually Cain's sister? Or were there other people on earth and Yahweh is just the creator-god of the Jews?

Look here...if you're going to start applying logic to religion, we're all going to get a headache.

I do agree with the notion that Jehovah wasn't saying there weren't other gods...He just meant that He was new, improved, holier-than-them version, and should therefore be The One and Only.

This is not altogether unreminiscient of the New Right...

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphageek31337
Also, the only thing I've been able to find in Genesis on Cain reproducing has a pretty abrupt jump:

"Cain went to the land of Nod, East of Eden. And Cain knew his wife."

No mention of other people created by God, no mention of the incestuous relationship that must have developed if these people weren't created by God and, therefore in the mind of biblical literalists, didn't exist. Incest being a sin/abomination against God/a bad idea, where did the rest of us come from? Where does it mention that Enoch's mom is actually Cain's sister? Or were there other people on earth and Yahweh is just the creator-god of the Jews?

This is actually a super frequent question, and I'll let better minds than mine answer. One answer is found at this site,(http://www.answersingenesis.org/home...cains_wife.asp) and I'll quote for the lazy:

Quote:

We don’t even know her name, yet she was discussed at the Scopes trial, mentioned in the play and movie Inherit the Wind1 and the book and movie Contact2, and has been talked about in countries all over the world. Is she the most-talked-about wife in history?

Skeptics have used Cain’s wife time and again to try to discredit the book of Genesis as a true historical record. Sadly, most Christians have not been able to give an adequate answer to this question. As a result, the world thinks Christians cannot defend the authority of Scripture and, thus, the Christian faith.

{snip}

Thus, there was only one man at the beginning—made from the dust of the Earth (Genesis 2:7).

This also means that Cain’s wife was a descendant of Adam. She could not have come from another ‘race’ of people and must be one of Adam’s descendants.

{snip}

All this makes it obvious that there was only one woman, Adam’s wife, at the beginning. There were never any other women around who were not Eve’s descendants.

{snip}

During their lives, Adam and Eve had a number of male and female children. The Jewish historian Josephus wrote that, ‘The number of Adam’s children, as says the old tradition, was thirty-three sons and twenty-three daughters.’11

The Bible does not tell us how many children were born to Adam and Eve. However, considering their long life spans (Adam lived for 930 years—Genesis 5:5), it would seem reasonable to suggest there were many! Remember, they were commanded to ‘Be fruitful, and multiply’ (Genesis 1:28).

{snip}

Some claim that the passage in Genesis 4:16–17 means that Cain went to the land of Nod and found a wife. Thus, they can conclude there must have been another race of people on the Earth, who were not descendants of Adam, who produced Cain’s wife.

‘And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bore Enoch: and he built a city, and he called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.’

From what has been stated previously, it is clear that all humans, Cain’s wife included, are descendants of Adam. However, this passage does not say that Cain went to the land of Nod and found a wife. John Calvin, commenting on these verses, states:

‘From the context we may gather that Cain, before he slew his brother, had married a wife; otherwise Moses would now have related something respecting his marriage.’13

Cain was married before he went to the land of Nod. He didn’t find a wife there, but ‘knew’ (had sexual relations with) his wife.14

Others have argued that because Cain built a ‘city’ in the land of Nod, there must have been a lot of people there. However, the Hebrew word translated as ‘city’ need not mean what we might imagine from the connotations of ‘city’ today. The word meant a ‘walled town’ or a protected encampment.15 Even a hundred people would be plenty for such a ‘city.’ Nevertheless, there could have been many descendants of Adam on the Earth by the time of Abel’s death (see below).

{snip}
Hope that clears that up.

Quote:

Whereas if you take the book as an allegory, a collection of really cool stories that give you a pretty good example of how to live, then it all makes perfect sense.
But if it's only allegory, then it's not the infallible word of God.

OnyxCougar 11-10-2004 01:20 PM

Also wanted to add this since it's been brought up

Quote:

Many people immediately reject the conclusion that Adam and Eve’s sons and daughters married each other by appealing to the law against brother-sister intermarriage. Some say that you cannot marry your relation. Actually, if you don’t marry your relation, you don’t marry a human! A wife is related to her husband even before they marry because all people are descendants of Adam and Eve—all are of ‘one blood.’ The law forbidding marriage between close relatives was not given until the time of Moses (Leviticus 18–20). Provided marriage was one man to one woman for life (based on Genesis 1 and 2), there was no disobedience to God’s law originally when close relatives (even brothers and sisters) married each other.

Remember that Abraham married his half-sister (Genesis 20:12). God blessed this union to produce the Hebrew people through Isaac and Jacob. It was not until some 400 years later that God gave Moses laws that forbade such marriages.


Elspode 11-10-2004 06:21 PM

So...I guess this explains Original Sin. If we schtup anyone at all, we're committing incest!

xoxoxoBruce 11-11-2004 08:41 PM

Quote:

But if it's only allegory, then it's not the infallible word of God.
The infallible allegory of God, then. :eyebrow:

wolf 11-11-2004 10:53 PM

Follow up on the Druids.

Who are currently denying actually being Druish.

It's research or something ...

Cyber Wolf 11-12-2004 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnyxCougar
But if it's only allegory, then it's not the infallible word of God.

Well considering all we have to go on is the writings and ramblings of completely fallible humans writing what their fallible brains remember or want to remember, then there's the issue of many many many years of seperation/evolution of cultures between then and now, also considering some things happened/were written before the Tower of Babel and we know how translating from one tongue to another tends causes some loss of meaning, intent or inflection...

alphageek31337 11-12-2004 12:08 PM

Infallegory....ten dollar word.

Quote:

Cain went out from before God's presence. He settled in the land of Nod, to the east of Eden. Cain knew his wife. She conceived and gave birth to Enoch. [Cain] was building a city, and he named the city Enoch, after his son.
Genesis 4:16-17

He either left with one of A&E's daughters, who would have been incredibly young at the time, or he picked someone up at a dive bar in Nod.

Edit: Wolf makes an interesting point. If you regard an English translation of the Bible as infallible, even as an infallegory, then you're already messed up because a lot of the Word of God is lost in translation. Even something as simple as "though shalt not kill" gets screwed up. The original word in Hebrew actually translates to 'assassinate', or 'murder from a hidden place'. Which goes far to justifying all the killing, later on, in God's name.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.