The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Image of the Day (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   11/24/2004: Billboard coverup (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=7284)

Undertoad 11-24-2004 12:10 PM

11/24/2004: Billboard coverup
 
http://cellar.org/2004/billboardchange.jpg

Can you feel the ass of the culture tightening? In this case it's in Israel, where a group of ultra-Orthodox Jews demanded that Sarah Jessica Parker's dress should be a little less revealing.

full story

jaguar 11-24-2004 12:43 PM

.............Lucky she wasn't showing any ankle or they really would have let her have it.

Troubleshooter 11-24-2004 02:22 PM

Retards...

SteveDallas 11-24-2004 02:32 PM

Soon we'll be back to public floggings as punishment for using naughty words.

Slothboy 11-24-2004 03:29 PM

Well, come on. It's Israel for crying out loud, not Los Angeles. It was bad research to assume they would find that sort of marketing acceptable in the first place.

I would agree that in the US the pendulum is swinging back to "tight ass" land, but Israel founded the Tight Ass Nation in the first place.

At least they didn't burn the billboard to the ground.

capnhowdy 11-24-2004 03:30 PM

It appears to me that not only did they change her clothing, they changed her skin tone to be more "culturally acceptable".
The company name is Unilever. Maybe I really AM twisted. Sounds like a sex toy to me. :blush:

Troubleshooter 11-24-2004 03:34 PM

Is it just me or is her nose a little bigger as well?

Wombat 11-24-2004 03:42 PM

The apparent change in skin tone is probably just caused by different light giving different exposure (no pun intended). And do you really think her nose could get any bigger?

xoxoxoBruce 11-24-2004 08:46 PM

Chanting....Burka for Bradshaw...Burka for Bradshaw...Burka for Bradshaw. :rolleyes:

gregle 11-25-2004 07:14 AM

"Lucky she wasn't showing any ankle or they really would have let her have it."

"Retards."

Come now. Different cultures have different standards, for any number of cultural, religious and social reasons.

Over here in the UK we were laughing our arses off at the (to us) ludicrous furore that erupted over Janet Jackson's infamous 'nipple slip' at the Superbowl – "Quick Marjorie! Cover the children's eyes before they're corrupted forever and damned to an eternity in the fiery pit!"

By the same token, billboards and TV ads for shower/bath products across Europe regularly show women's breasts and nobody blinks – it's normal.

The quoted kneejerk reactions above are ill-thought-out and emit a slightly unpleasant whiff of xenophobia. Don't sneer at what you don't understand.

Clodfobble 11-25-2004 09:25 AM

Wow, the UK's stereotypical "American" name is Marjorie? :confused:

gregle 11-25-2004 12:14 PM

Not really - just the first thing that popped into my head, for some bizarre reason. You get my (slightly pompous) point though, surely? :3eye:

Clodfobble 11-25-2004 12:33 PM

Oh yes, I got the overall point. I was just amused at the name choice. Here in the U.S. (or at least down south), the everyman Brit would be named Jeeves, or Nigel, or Niles.

Cyber Wolf 11-25-2004 07:39 PM

Someone quoted on WTOP that the coverup was done because it's WINTER now so she wouldn't be showing as much skin.

Har.

York 11-26-2004 11:41 AM

than they forgot the cap and gloves...

jaguar 11-26-2004 12:16 PM

Quote:

Well, come on. It's Israel for crying out loud, not Los Angeles. It was bad research to assume they would find that sort of marketing acceptable in the first place.
Er....you might want to reconsider some of your assumptions about Israel, seriously, tel aviv is as modern and open (socially) as any other big western city and most of the country is the same.

Brown Thrasher 11-26-2004 02:17 PM

Those are the two most terrible pictures of Sally Jessica Parker, I have ever seen. They should have covered her face as well...

Troubleshooter 11-27-2004 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregle
Come now. Different cultures have different standards, for any number of cultural, religious and social reasons.

Everything has a reason. That doesn't mean that it is a good reason.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregle
Over here in the UK we were laughing our arses off at the (to us) ludicrous furore that erupted over Janet Jackson's infamous 'nipple slip' at the Superbowl – "Quick Marjorie! Cover the children's eyes before they're corrupted forever and damned to an eternity in the fiery pit!"

As did I, I've done enough travelling to realize that stupid knows know bounds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregle
By the same token, billboards and TV ads for shower/bath products across Europe regularly show women's breasts and nobody blinks – it's normal.

That just shows that they can't be wrong all of the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregle
The quoted kneejerk reactions above are ill-thought-out and emit a slightly unpleasant whiff of xenophobia. Don't sneer at what you don't understand.

1) Definitely not kneejerk;
2) thoroughly thought out, plenty of practice cuts down on the cycle time;
3) not xenophobic, see my travel note above;
4) don't berate the understanding of someone you lack knowldge of.

jaguar 11-27-2004 10:19 AM

Sorry gregle but you're not making too much sense, if you found the superbowl incident hilarious why do you think we should view this in solemn silence and slowly try and comprehend which ever bunch of fundies are behind this one? They're both silly incidents that are not good reflections on their respective societies nor are they that representative of the population in general and certainly doesn't fit my experiences with Israelis. In short, what is is you find has 'wiffs of xenophobia' about my comment.

xoxoxoBruce 11-28-2004 02:19 AM

I think Isreal has more nude or at least topless beaches than the US does. Either that or the people sending pics to Project Voyeur & VoyeurWeb are lying. :)

CharlieG 11-29-2004 06:56 AM

Folks, it's the Mid-East. By Middle Eastern standards they are NOT tight assed bastards - they aren't making the women wear burkas, right?

Hate to be Non PC - but lets thing of this - we have 2 major religions still based in the Middle East (Catholicism has been based in Rome _OR_ congregationalist for a LONG time) - both have a LOT in common - in fact, if you remove religion, it would be hard to tell an Arab from an Israeli

xoxoxoBruce 11-29-2004 07:00 PM

Quote:

in fact, if you remove religion, it would be hard to tell an Arab from an Israeli
Naw, the Israelis carry Galilis and Uzis whereas the Arabs favor AKs. ;)

Uryoces 11-30-2004 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
Naw, the Israelis carry Galilis and Uzis whereas the Arabs favor AKs. ;)

or German-made H&K MP5's and PDW's. How's that for irony?

xoxoxoBruce 11-30-2004 08:35 PM

Which side carry the German guns? Both? :confused:

wolf 12-01-2004 12:34 AM

Here's a nice overview of the Israeli Special Forces weapons.

jaguar 12-01-2004 02:06 AM

I don't see any H&K goodies in there..

Troubleshooter 12-01-2004 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf
Here's a nice overview of the Israeli Special Forces weapons.

And the Mossberg appears once more...

http://www.isayeret.com/weapons/sws/...g/mossberg.htm

As a sniper weapon...

http://www.isayeret.com/sniping/sniper-50.jpg


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.