1/31: Space junk map
http://cellar.org/2002/spacejunk.jpg
These maps of the locations of various items in space are not to scale. http://cellar.org/2002/spacejunk2.jpg But it's interesting to know that someone is keeping track of at least some of the stuff we've left out there. http://cellar.org/2002/spacejunk3.jpg Because they do make for a serious collision problem for spacecraft that expect to find nothing but vacuum in their way. |
And all that stuff is in slightly different orbits. Here's a screenshot from th etool I use to track satellites I can talk to from my ham radio station:
|
Please learn to resize images maggie! You're a repeat offender!
Yea i saw those on ZZZ, i'm supprisedthere hasne't been more serious accidents/commercial sats knocked out. |
Quote:
Didn't know your a ham - I got my ticket back in December 73 KC2IXE |
Quote:
Looks good on my screen, sorry to hear about yours; maybe it has too many animated smilies on it. Now I know why you've been telling us you see "Fisher-Price My First PC" in your server logs....check the IP address, it's probably yours. :-) |
Looks too small at work (probably all the work-related crap clogging up the screen ;) ), but should look really good on my new 1280 x 1024 APPLE 17" STUDIO DISPLAY!
|
Wide enough to completely stuff the width of the thread, its happened a few times, i'm quite sure you're capable of doing it, you're just too frigging lazy. It stuffs the width here at 1024, which is pretty damn stupid. I know its an images forum, and shock horror, you're the only person i've noticed who posts pics without bothering to resize them, being the time consuming operationit is and all.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Every image I've posted here from this machine (as opposed to URLs from another server) has been resized....even the screen shot you're whining about (although not much). The app writes an 880x470 window (along with another text window of tabular data.) I shrank it slightly after grabbing it with The GIMP, but not much because I wanted the text on it to be legible. Yuore conserm abuot txet legebility iz legnedary, fo coruse. Maybe you need a new video card. What resolution are you running, that this is such a big deal? |
1024x768, as i said. GF2GTS64Mb on a Sony E220....try reading.
The point is that i *shouldn't* have to scroll horizonatally, its bloody annoying. Ever been to fark? They delete images that screw the layout of the forums, there is a good reason for that. |
Yes, it is very annoying to have to scroll horizontally.
Hm. *Grin* I'm running at 800x600 resolution. When I installed Win2k, it gave me a default resolution of 800x600, and when I changed it back to my normal 1024x768 the tiny little text hurt my eyes. So I left it at 800x600 =] |
Torrere? You on a 15in or something?
Graphics stuff, switch from 1024x768@100hz to 1600*1200@72 gaaaak! Painful. edit- 1600*1200 instad of the other way round. |
Quote:
I'm not going to compromise the image quality further just so you don't have to scroll. Try using your non-wanking hand on the mouse when scrolling, just to balance out the RMI.. Further, on my browsers, the only table cell affected by the width of the image I posted is the one the image is in. If you want to see the image, scroll. If not, don't. Either way, "stuffing the width" is exactly what you should do. |
I run an ICQ bar down the side of the screen.
Apart from that, i'm nto going to respond to uncalled for, petty insults. |
I run an ICQ bar down the side of the screen.
Apart from that, i'm not going to respond to uncalled for, petty insulting drivel that seems to be your natural state of speach. In other news, i'm outa here anyway, schoolwork this year is crazy, and i don't have time to burn on cellar anymore, ill stop by every now and then, a bit like syc, but I won't be regualry posting. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.