They're Watching You
 

Of course, you're not allowed to know about any of this despite the pending lawsuits. It would threaten 'merica.

So the people who are surfing legitimately under their own IP addresses can be watched, but the ones who are sneaking around under cloaking services (and probably doing less than legitmate stuff) won't have records of their movements. Now if I were going to go out and set up a subversive site or promote illegal acts, I certainly wouldn't go do it under my own, very traceable IP address.

So what is the point?

Stormie

Welcome to the USSR, comrades.

The data would be worth billions. And there will be folks lined up to buy it. And we won't know a thing.

Thank you, Kitsune for your efforts to support the hygiene of the previous thread.

The links to the quotes did not survive the transition, so here they are

Mercury News story. Many others like it.

The Eternal Value of Privacy.

They're all fairly short, please read them. Then weep.

We are all potential criminals, we are all potential terrorists.

Most importantly, we're giving them an inch so, later on, they can take a mile. A year ago everyone found it okay to monitor international phone calls because the government wasn't doing anything with domestic ones. Now we find it okay to have our call logs monitored because, well, they're not actually listening to the conversations. No one is concerned that their search engine requests are being noted because the government isn't sifting through all of the e-mail we send. When it is made public that the government is tagging conversations and e-mails for key words, no one will mind so much because they were already keeping tabs on who you called and when and, besides, everyone knows your phone isn't a secure method of communication. To do that, you should meet with the person face-to-face, since it is obvious that the government would never place warrantless taps in your house...

No one will be upset unless the government forces the cancellation of American Idol, anyways. The American people are complacent and accepting of big government.

Stormie:

The point is that tracking everyone's information in the hopes that a evidence of a crime will be found is akin to stopping everyone on the road, looking for, well, looking for whatever they want to find.
Do you want your ISP to hand over six lines of your writing to Cardinal Gonzales?

My point (obviously not well made) is that the truely intelligent criminals capable of catastrophic harm won't be traceable or trackable online.

So this effort by the Justice Department will net them nothing much other than the stupid people who can't be bothered or don't know how to stealth. Or, as you say, they will gain information worth millions which can be used to influence, prejudice, coerce, bully or brainwash the public.

I am 110% against such a thing as I agree that no good can come of it and it is indeed a slippery slope to complete loss of freedom. I've lived in countries where freedom was extremely curtailed, and know exactly how it feels.

Stormie

Of all the "sky is falling" messages to come out in the last ten years, this is the first one to really worry me. Maybe it's because I'm such a techno-geek. Maybe it's because it came so soon after the domestic call logging news. But this is just the sort of thing that will be innocent-seeming to some, but could very well be the first whisper from the voice of big brother.

I'd hate to be their position though. People want them to take action, but there is just no way they have the resources to catch the really dangerous ones that would make the program worthwhile. Plus, if people are getting angery over something capable of only catching your average person, can you imagine the response to a government electronic surveillance program with the power to catch professional hackers??

9th Engineer:

I have never been to prison. I don't know about you, but I reckon we both have read and watched enough to get a common read on how much liberty, privacy and freedom the inmates enjoy. Practically zero, am I right? Do we agree? 100 percent monitoring of communications, movement, actions, everything, all the time, forever and ever. And it's freaking expensive too. Costs more to jail someone in federal prison than to send them a student to college. (No, I don't have the numbers to four significant digits.)

And still, crime happens in prison. Inmates are terrorized by other inmates. There are well documented cases of horrible abuses of power by the jailers. There is no escaping evil in human society, regardless of how tightly constrained that society is. It is not possible.

When I hear you or others say "I want the government to take action" or "Protect me!!", my response is that life is dangerous. The very perfume of freedom flows from the secret, delicate centers of two of our great nations most precious flowers, liberty and privacy. As my analogy hopefully illustrates, taking away the flowers deprives us of the pleasure of the pefume without protecting us from any of the danger.

You're right. I'm pissed off now, and more would be worse. Tragically, there is no amount of surveillance that will accomplish the putative goal. Already we're crushing the living heart of what makes us Americans, the land of the free and home of the brave, by surrendering our freedoms and capitulating to fear.

The ONLY answer is to stop drinking the kool-aid. Don't be afraid. Do be diligent in retaining your rights. Don't give terrorists the victory over America by giving away the traits that make us Americans.

Okay, now that's just frackin' brilliant. I hereby announce my intention to use that analogy with great abandon for the forseeable future.

And prisoners always fall into their roles. It makes me wonder what will happen to American society if they all know they're being watched, being listened to, being monitored. What role will people fall into when you treat everyone like a criminal?

I'd suspect it would be the same as the Soviet Union or Cuba with everyone snitching on their neighbors to the building or block capo.:mad: