The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Stones smoker didn't break law after all (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=11602)

rkzenrage 08-29-2006 08:48 PM

Stones smoker didn't break law after all
 
Thank god the jack-booted idiots lose one.

Stones smoker didn't break law after all
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/SHOWBIZ/...hardssmoke.jpg
Keith Richards: Journalists reported his smoking on stage to the council.
POSTED: 3:00 a.m. EDT, August 29, 2006
GLASGOW, Scotland (AP) -- Keith Richards won't be fined for reportedly lighting up during a Rolling Stones concert in Scotland.

The stage at Hampden Park, where the band performed Friday night on their "A Bigger Bang" tour, is exempt from a new law that bans smoking in enclosed public places, the Glasgow City Council said Monday.

Violators of the new law, which took effect in March, can be fined up to $95. The ban includes theaters and sports venues.

Richards' publicists at LD Communications in London did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The City Council said it had heard from journalists that the 62-year-old guitarist was smoking during the performance, but it wasn't known whether the journalists had been at the concert.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

xoxoxoBruce 08-29-2006 09:09 PM

I shouldn't think that law would apply to an actor engaged in a theatrical performance, which he certainly was. :D

rkzenrage 08-30-2006 12:13 AM

See... you are trying to apply logic to antis... it does not work that way.
Remember these are people who think that private property should be their's to rule over.
Logic is their bane.

wolf 08-30-2006 08:37 AM

Nearly 50 years of drug use and he gets busted for a Marlboro?

rkzenrage 08-30-2006 11:38 AM

Right... no lie.

be-bop 09-06-2006 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
I shouldn't think that law would apply to an actor engaged in a theatrical performance, which he certainly was. :D


Oh yes it does !! http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar...4,1573,00.html

rkzenrage 09-06-2006 10:23 PM

Idiots & plebians. Nothing more.

xoxoxoBruce 09-06-2006 10:29 PM

I stand corrected. I never thought the Scots would stand for such stupidity.....must have been the stinkin' lowlanders. :sniff:

Sundae 09-07-2006 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
I stand corrected. I never thought the Scots would stand for such stupidity.....must have been the stinkin' lowlanders. :sniff:

Scotland is ahead of England & Wales in this at present. We're not going to face it for a couple of years yet...

rkzenrage 09-07-2006 02:17 PM

Not ahead... this kind of thing is backward... it is "behind".

Griff 09-07-2006 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sundae Girl
Scotland is ahead of England & Wales in this at present. We're not going to face it for a couple of years yet...

Ouch. Home rule may not be all its cracked up to be.

be-bop 09-07-2006 05:41 PM

Now the Health Police have got smoking banned in public Places the next target on their list is drinking or binge drinking as they keep banging on about .
One of the madcap Ideas was to limit each person to be only allowed 4 drinks max in any 1 bar visit,how it would work in reality is beyond me....

lumberjim 09-08-2006 12:13 AM

[gumby]I think....they should tax.....all people.....standing in water!......oh![/gumby]

rkzenrage 09-08-2006 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by be-bop
Now the Health Police have got smoking banned in public Places the next target on their list is drinking or binge drinking as they keep banging on about .
One of the madcap Ideas was to limit each person to be only allowed 4 drinks max in any 1 bar visit,how it would work in reality is beyond me....

Well, this is good news!
So those on private property can smoke all they want, outstanding!:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.