The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Politics (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   We are in even more trouble now (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=12740)

yesman065 12-12-2006 01:11 PM

We are in even more trouble now
 
http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/po...nce-chief.html

How the Heck can this guy be appointed to the House intelligence chief position and NOT know this???? How the hell can any senator/congressman not know this?? This is truly frightening.

Flint 12-12-2006 01:15 PM

sounds familiar...
 
Have you ever worked for someone who has never done your job, nor really knows anything about it, but were hired for "management" experience?

xoxoxoBruce 12-13-2006 04:52 AM

Flint hit the nail square on the head...... it's corporate thinking.
Who do they want running the show? MBAs.
Doesn't matter if the business is making widgets, handling information, hardware, software or high tech toys. You know that professional manager doesn't know jack-shit about what his people are doing, only if they are meeting deadlines and being cooperative/not disruptive. Of course he set the deadlines, and he's no help if you get stuck, but that's your problem... not his.

On the upside, Reyes not knowing the answers to the questions may be a good thing. Maybe instead of taking the position with preconceived notions, he'll use the power of the position to find out the truth.



Naw. :headshake

yesman065 12-13-2006 07:09 AM

I can relate to your "fresh-thinking" perspective, but it would be nice to know what or who the problem is. The fact that he couldn't distinguish between "Shiite" and "Sunni" is unconscionable.

Griff 12-13-2006 07:12 AM

He'll be very easy to control by whoever gets in the saddle. He knows nothing so he'll believe whatever he is fed.

yesman065 12-13-2006 07:14 AM

Isn't that the situation many here say we are in now? Why would we want to do it again? Oh, thats right - - - -> politics as usual.

Stormieweather 12-13-2006 07:57 AM

What bothers me most is not that he didn't know this information (even the most intelligent people don't know everything), but that he actually answered with a guess rather than admit he didn't know. It's ok to not know something, but the peak of stupidity to answer as though you do know (erroneously, as it turns out) and prove you're an idiot.

Stormie

Spexxvet 12-13-2006 08:02 AM

Didn't W fail the same sort of test, and then got elected president? Hopefully the results will not be the same... maybe he's a quick study.

chrisinhouston 12-13-2006 08:04 AM

What troubles me is that Pelosi picked him over 2 more senior Democrats who have much more experience because she doesn't get along with them. She also made that dumb move by supporting Murtha when he had all that baggage.

MESSAGE TO CONGRESS: WAKE UP AND LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS!!!

Torrere 12-13-2006 10:03 AM

Well, they appended an update to the article, where Sen. Reyes clarifies that he does know what's going on. He is "acutely aware of Al Qaeda's desire to harm Americans." He sounds so much more smart and knowledgeable when he uses words like "acutely".

In the original article in Congressional Quarterly, it's clear that he not only has trouble distinguishing Shia from Sunni (which might be excusable for the average American), but also that he has no idea what Hezbollah is.


Also, it seems that Trent Lott hit the nail on the head:
“Why do they kill people of other religions because of religion?”

skysidhe 12-13-2006 10:11 AM

I saw this on the Today show the other day.

It brought up the memory of Kerry saying we needed sensitivity training regarding the middle east yet was snickered at.

When will we ever learn?:headshake:

MaggieL 12-13-2006 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skysidhe
It brought up the memory of Kerry saying we needed sensitivity training regarding the middle east yet was snickered at.

Of many things Kerry has said, that's probably among the most snicker-worthy.

skysidhe 12-13-2006 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL
Of many things Kerry has said, that's probably among the most snicker-worthy.

What does that word mean to you? When someone says that sensitivity training in is order what do you hear? Just curious. I know the Rebublican mind translates things differently. Oh and sensitivity might not mean to me what you think it does.:)

yesman065 12-13-2006 12:08 PM

The more I read about Pelosi, the more worried I get. I am ok with change as long as it produces a more beneficial leadership - however this is beginning to look like a step backward.

Sensitivity - in this context, to me means a better understanding of what the other culture believes, feels wants. . . and a better comprehension of how to relay the same information from us in a way they will understand, without it coming across as US telling THEM.

We already tried that and it hasn't worked out so well yet.

MaggieL 12-13-2006 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skysidhe
What does that word mean to you? When someone says that sensitivity training in is order what do you hear? Just curious. I know the Rebublican mind translates things differently. Oh and sensitivity might not mean to me what you think it does.:)

OK...let's start off with "I'm not a Republican." (Or a rebublican.)

Now, with that out of the way...

What does "sensitivity training" mean to me? It means somebody has decided somebody else is insufficiently politically correct, and is in a position to try to impose their own values and point-of-view, while whitewashing it as pedagogy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.