The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Farms Must Be Exempted From Emission Rules (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=16707)

tw 02-26-2008 04:24 AM

Farms Must Be Exempted From Emission Rules
 
Many would quickly forget how we tried to start a war with China over a silly spy plane. But then memories are even shorter. How many remember contaminated vegetables killing or sickening people because emissions from upstream factory farms in CA. They assume you will forget. From the Washington Post of 26 Feb 2008:
Quote:

Farms May Be Exempted From Emission Rules
Lawmakers from farm states have repeatedly tried to attach provisions exempting farms from emissions reporting. Last March, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin C. Peterson (D-Minn.) and more than 130 lawmakers from agricultural states sponsored a bill that would delist manure as an environmental pollutant under the Superfund law.

The measure came after the cities of Waco, Tex., and Tulsa, Okla., and the state of Oklahoma filed lawsuits charging factory farms nearby with polluting water sources. ...

But when Johnson testified before Congress last year on the proposed exemption, the association said, he did not tell lawmakers of the local officials' opposition. Asked why by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the EPA responded in writing, saying that the agency "did not interpret the discussion as representing an opposition of state and local air pollution control agencies to our proposed plan."
The exemption is requested by big factory farms; opposed by those who live there. Under George Jr, K-Street money to politicians has increased by over a factor of 10.

Are they wacko Democrats and Republicans; or independents who instead work for the people? You are expected to forget all those contaminated vegetables last year. You are expected only to remember what propaganda machines tell you to think this week. That evil EPA regulation must be killed. What else might die?

Why should those regulations be eliminated? Because nothing toxic comes from factory farms. Forget last year's news. It is good for a Democrat or Republican when you forget.

TheMercenary 02-26-2008 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 435013)
...a silly spy plane...

And that says it all. :headshake

btw, there was no near war, attempts to start one, or desire on anyone's part to do so...

HungLikeJesus 02-26-2008 11:50 AM

That e. coli spinach came from an organic farm, I'm sure of it.

lookout123 02-26-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Phfft! Facts. You can use them to prove anything.
--Homer Simpson

please don't let facts get in the way of tw's point.

Aliantha 02-26-2008 04:24 PM

There must be provisions for the dumping of manure from factory farms surely.

With regard to the actual intent of the thread (from what I can tell anyway). Just about anything can be a pollutant if it's in the wrong place at the wrong time, just as any plant can be a weed if it grows where you don't want it.

HungLikeJesus 02-26-2008 04:48 PM

Well said, Ali.

Kingswood 02-26-2008 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha (Post 435277)
There must be provisions for the dumping of manure from factory farms surely.

If I had my way, I would take all the shitty effluent from factory farms to big algae ponds in the desert, use the shit as fertiliser to grow algae, and produce biodiesel as a by-product.

Where's there's muck there's brass.

tw 02-27-2008 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha (Post 435277)
There must be provisions for the dumping of manure from factory farms surely. ... Just about anything can be a pollutant if it's in the wrong place at the wrong time, just as any plant can be a weed if it grows where you don't want it.

What is a pollutant is on a list. A list that factory farms want to exempted from. Where a pollutant can and cannot be (using numbers) is also defined. Manure is not dumped. It is processed. But some would 'accidentally' dump it. Clearly the State of Oklahoma must be wrong. Clearly no contaminated cauliflower last year was sickening people.

There must be provisions for the dumping Aliantha's shit somewhere? Really?

Aliantha 02-27-2008 04:20 PM

What is your point tw? Just give us the abridged version huh?

Do you somehow get the idea that I don't understand what pollutants are and what happens to manure from factory farms? If so, you're mistaken.

Are you trying to make some backhanded joke about how people's political affiliations change to suit themselves? If so, it's not very clear.

xoxoxoBruce 02-27-2008 11:36 PM

On a regular farm, the manure goes back of the fields that grow the food for the livestock.

The factory farms produce an order of magnitude more manure and has no land to spread it on, because the livestock feed is grown elsewhere.

Shipping the manure to where the livestock feed is grown, is much more expensive than using chemical fertilizer made from oil.

The bottom line take priority over the environment.

tw 02-28-2008 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 435654)
Shipping the manure to where the livestock feed is grown, is much more expensive than using chemical fertilizer made from oil.

Another example of why oil prices are too low?

Meanwhile, the City of Philadelphia has no problem finding markets for their manure.

classicman 02-28-2008 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 435664)
Meanwhile, the City of Philadelphia has no problem finding markets for their manure.

Yeah - like the Eagles, they're all full of shit! :lol2:

TheMercenary 02-28-2008 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 435692)
Yeah - like the Eagles, they're all full of shit! :lol2:

:D

tw 02-28-2008 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 435692)
Yeah - like the Eagles, they're all full of shit!

Not true. The Eagles got the shit kicked out of them this year (but not as much as Miami).

BigV 03-05-2008 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 435654)
On a regular farm, the manure goes back of the fields that grow the food for the livestock.

The factory farms produce an order of magnitude more manure and has no land to spread it on, because the livestock feed is grown elsewhere.

Shipping the manure to where the livestock feed is grown, is much more expensive than using chemical fertilizer made from oil.

The bottom line take priority over the environment.

Now there's somewhere else to ship the manure to--the digester lagoons. Of course, you have to be near a gas pipeline to feed it back into the grid, but I wonder why this couldn't be used in a standalone scenario for cogeneration of energy for the large farm much like sawmills use sawdust as a complementary sources of energy used to power the processes that create more sawdust (and wood products, of course).
California cows start passing gas to the grid
Quote:

Tue Mar 4, 2008 6:30pm EST

By Nichola Groom

RIVERDALE, California (Reuters) - Imagine a vat of liquid cow manure covering the area of five football fields and 33 feet deep. Meet California's most alternative new energy.

On a dairy farm in the Golden State's agricultural heartland, utility PG&E Corp began on Tuesday producing natural gas derived from manure, in what it hopes will be a new way to power homes with renewable, if not entirely clean, energy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.