The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Attorney accidentally releases names of sources (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19182)

classicman 01-07-2009 09:07 PM

Attorney accidentally releases names of sources
 
U.S. Attorney accidentally releases names of sources in fraud case

Quote:

JANUARY 7--In a remarkable screw-up, a Department of Justice official today accidentally distributed to the media a document containing the names of nearly 20 confidential witnesses interviewed during a federal probe targeting the operators of a fraudulent investment scheme. In announcing felony charges against two men for their roles in an alleged $15 million Ponziesque swindle, the spokesman for Chicago U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald (he of Rod Blagojevich- and Scooter Libby-prosecuting fame) e-mailed reporters a 62-page U.S. District Court complaint filed against John Walsh and Charles Martin, principals of the now-defunct One World Capital Group. Included in the document was a one-page key that identified by name sources referred to in the complaint only by monikers such as "Employee A," "Customer D," or "Individual F." The inadvertent disclosure of the sources--former One World employees, customers, and "other" individuals who spoke with FBI and IRS agents--caused Fitzgerald spokesman Randall Samborn to send an urgent follow-up email asking journalists to destroy the complaint due to the "non-public information disclosing the identities of persons not named in the affidavit."
Oops. :headshake

Perry Winkle 01-07-2009 09:21 PM

Based on my first-hand knowledge of the DoD Army JAG corps., I'm not surprised in the least.

richlevy 01-07-2009 09:32 PM

This is why public officials can't be sued.

Beestie 01-07-2009 10:15 PM

Why are witnesses protected in this case? Not questioning it as much as asking.

The whole idea of secret witnesses is a little chilling to me. I understand in cases where repraisal is a possibility (witnesses to gang violence, for example) but secrecy should be the exception.

I must be missing some obvious explanation.

Griff 01-08-2009 06:27 AM

That is odd. The actual indictment hasn't occurred yet, maybe at that point the prosecuters open up?

Sundae 01-08-2009 08:40 AM

[Dad's Army] "Don't tell them, Pike" [/Dad's Army]

TheMercenary 01-08-2009 09:36 PM

Funny as hell. I love it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.