![]() |
Dead mother incubator
You may be familiar with this story where a husband asked hospital staff to keep his brain dead wife on life support for two days in order to give their baby a high chance of survival.
Quote:
What do you think? |
They did the right thing, IMO. Give the baby a fighting chance.
|
It would seem pointless not to. And it makes for an AWESOME band name. Dibs!
|
What would the mother have wanted? That's the only question that needs to be answered. Most mothers-to-be would rather do whatever they could to give their baby a better chance. Dad should know.
|
Smart and logical choice by the family and hospital. In this country they probably would not have even given the father a choice.
|
Quote:
|
...And he would have chosen differently, why? :confused:
|
I couldn't see making a decision other than the one he made. Losing his wife would be bad enough. Why let the baby die too?
|
Quote:
Just asking because I'm genuinely curious as to how people approach this. |
See? I knew it would take a couple of posts for this to come up. lol
;) |
Yeah. I hate being the one to have done it, but it followed naturally.
You expect a guy to shell out cash for it, he should have a say in all the other decisions. |
No, I don't mean he would have chosen differently. I mean, if people are against keeping her alive and think he made the wrong choice to prolong her life, why is "she would have wanted this" the only thing that matters? Why isn't it just as valid for the dad to say "I don't care what my wife would've wanted - I want that baby to live."
As far as ending the baby's life, actually, I don't think it's up to either of them. IMO if it is possible for the baby to survive by keeping the mother on life support, it would be unethical for anyone to choose otherwise. When you conceive, you are an incubator. Your body belongs just as much to the baby as to yourself. But then, I'm staunchly pro-life so I guess I'll get flamed now. If he doesn't want the baby now that mom's dead, I'm sure there are many loving couples who would want to adopt a newborn. It's the older ones that are hard to place. My original point, though, was para #1. I get weary of father's rights being disregarded. But it doesn't matter. I'm just a dumb ass anyway. |
I would be very much against an abortion of a healthy viable foetus with a father ready to take in and take care of the child once it is born.
In that case, yes I would expect the mother to wait an extra two days in order for medical facilities to be available. Do I think men have a right to insist their sexual partner carries an embryo to term if she has no wish to be a mother? No. I am an atheist, I have no belief in souls, I do not call a foetus a baby. If a man has a strong desire to be a father there are plenty of women in the world happy to comply with him. If he knocks up someone with the same views as me, perhaps he should have got to know his partner before having intercourse. I have always taken preventative measures, but do not feel having an unwanted child is acceptable if they fail. The contraceptive pill is technically abortion. I took it for 10 years, no doubt aborting many clusters of cells. I've also taken the morning after pill more than once, potentially killing even more. I've been aware at every stage of what I am doing and how. At least that way if I burn in Hell I won't spend an eternity boring my neighbours with, "But I didn't know.....!" I accept there are some (few) reasons why a viable foetus might be aborted. But as far as I am aware, the mother changing her mind is not one of them. |
Murderer!!
Just kidding. lol!! I wonder how much cash a uterus and fetus go for these days........hmmmm? I think I would charge steeper prices than what would be affordable. |
I tried to donate eggs.
FAIL. But at least I tried. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.