The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Health (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   HIV protection? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=19493)

TheMercenary 02-09-2009 03:00 PM

HIV protection?
 
I guess it is a break through, but 30% protection is a pretty low number I think. 70% protection would be much better.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090209/ts_nm/us_aids_drug

monster 02-09-2009 07:45 PM

So this is supposed to be instead of condoms? Why? does it still allow conception?

TheMercenary 02-09-2009 07:57 PM

I am not to sure. It sounds like it still is in the testing stages. I still think 30% is crap.

Aliantha 02-09-2009 08:00 PM

Considering where the research is taking place and the massive numbers of women who contract HIV, I'd say 30% is way better than the previous figures which were almost zero thanks to the fact that using a condom is not very high on the list of priorities for people in the area.

Of course, someone would still have to be responsible for using the cream.

monster 02-09-2009 08:09 PM

but would they use this?

Aliantha 02-09-2009 08:11 PM

Yeah well, that's the question isn't it.

If I were to base my guess on historical points, I'd say no, but maybe with education...it really would be wonderful if it could happen.

TheMercenary 02-09-2009 08:38 PM

Ali, I thought about that. Eh. 30% of women in rural Africa is a start. The reality is that unless they get to a 70% or 80% range I am not sure that it will have much effect in a place where HIV is so rampant. Who knows. I guess it is a start.

monster 02-09-2009 08:41 PM

If they're not using condoms, why would they use this? Is it cheaper? you only have to apply once? what? is it just because the men object to condoms? And if so, why not so more on the development of the "femidoms"?

TheMercenary 02-09-2009 09:44 PM

My guess would be so women can take control of the issue since the men refuse to do so.

monster 02-09-2009 10:14 PM

yah, so... femidoms?

TheMercenary 02-09-2009 10:17 PM

I have no idea, other than an availability issue. Maybe they should combine the two like the old diaphram use.

Aliantha 02-09-2009 10:17 PM

Aren't they researching all sorts of things like that to try and curb the spread of HIV and AIDS in communities such as these?

It'll be interesting to see whether women are more responsible about protecting themselves and others than men have been so far. I don't really know if they will be. I think ignorance has no preference for gender.

Perry Winkle 02-09-2009 11:56 PM

If 30% is 30% then it's better than some treatments and diagnostics we currently put a lot of stock (and money) into...

Good reading.

Shawnee123 02-10-2009 07:58 AM

1 Attachment(s)
HIVe protection. He has none:

Wickedly_Tasteful 02-11-2009 07:40 PM

30% doesn't insure shit!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.