![]() |
The Redskins are Evil
From here
Want to know how a $5300 debt can turn into a $66,364 judgement? Read below. BTW, after the negative publicity, the team backed down. BTW, she should have just resold the tickets. Quote:
|
If they are altering contracts after they are signed or not reducing judgment amounts after re-selling seats, that would be fucked up, but the article is hardly convincing.
The people who signed contracts though.... why is it evil for the Redskins demand payment on them? That's the whole point of a contract. And this isn't about housing, food, medicine... it's fucking football. Pay your debts or your credit goes in the toilet - because you are a proven risk. Or maybe we need a government agency to examine people's financial records for them and approve or deny any purchases they want to make based on whether they can actually afford it.:rolleyes: |
The Redskins are bad because they refuse to change their disgusting name, that lady is bad for ever wanting to support them.
|
Quote:
It's as if the bank foreclosed on your house, sold it and made back their 100K, and then sought a judgement for another 100K. The Redskins basically stood to make a $60,000 profit above the revenue from reselling the seats by forcing the lady into bankruptcy. Evil...fucking....bastards. Of course the lady was a sucker for not showing up in court. She should also have tried to sell her tickets and forced the Redskins to not allow it. Oh, and I don't think anyone needs to be upset about the Redskins referencing native Americans. It's obvious that their red skin is the result of their being the spawns of Satan.:angry: |
Quote:
But yeah, they're evil because they're rich, I get it.:rolleyes: |
Quote:
Oh, wait. That was sarcasm. Now I get it.:p |
Go Cowboys
|
Quote:
That's a disgusting sexist and bovinist name and anyone who supports them must also be a digusting sexist and bovinist. And I don't even care if your bovine was sexed on 9/11 :p |
p.s. the woman was stupid. And probably the judge was too. Yes, they could have gone easier on her, but they were right, she signed a contract. She's supposed to be a realtor she ought to have known better. Mind, she can't be a very good one if she's still working at that age and the economic downturn affects her this badly.
If you sign a contract that you're not going to be able to afford if you lose your job (like a mortgage), you take out insurance to pay it for you, Why should this be any different? |
Quote:
|
you needed help with that?
...you're welcome... :) |
Cowboy and redskin are not even close in connotation. Redskin is a racial slur like nigger, spic, chink, ect. Cowboy is a profession or a job title and was not used to degrade a whole race of people.
|
Quote:
|
Redskin was NOT a term used by the team to be negative in any way. In fact it was intended to be just the opposite.
Back on track - They made a deal signed a contract and she reneged - what was done legally was done. What if the team said they didn't want to let her have the seats anymore? That would be a similar breach of contract and the team probably could be sued for it as well. . . plus pain and suffering (from not seeing her team in person) |
Well, anybody who would agree to pay that much for football tickets is crazy anyway. She should have been ruled mentally incompetant to engage in the contract in the first place. And the Redskins should have been sued for taking advantage of somebody with such diminished capacity.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.