![]() |
Sucks to be me
Everything you see here was taken today. Are you guys ready for the stuff from yesterday?
<img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Arching.jpg"> <img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Gidget.jpg"> <img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Hoodog.jpg"> <img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Olivia.jpg"> <img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Dreamer.jpg"> <img src="http://www.newzucanuze.com/images/BC3/Asses.jpg"> |
I am always ready for more pictures of young women clad in colorful two-piece forms of clothing...
When do you start shooting the lingerie contests, anyway? |
Thanks NBN. I was about to post something random on your previous entry, just to have it show up in the new threads again. Keep the supply comin', man.
Oh yeah, this doesn't mean I don't still hate you. |
Quote:
Still, thanks for the pics. Especially the last one. I won't claim to be indifferent to the charms of the human female torso, but there are other interesting parts of the body as well. You know, this reminds me of something I've read about cheesecake photography in the 1950s. Many amateur shots (including some of Bettie Page if I'm not mistaken) were taken by members of camera clubs who would hire a model and head out to a beach, forest, etc. and take some pictures. I wonder if anybody does anything like that today? (You probably can go to www.hotinternetmodels.com and find somebody to hire.) (And yes I made of that web site, I'm afraid to look and see what's really there.) |
Well I don't hate you. Hanging around with women that are nearly naked and don't mean it, can be taxing. Of course if you drop hints that you have pull with the judges it wouldn't be ethical. Would it? ;)
|
Quote:
|
Yeh, I don't really. Especially that brunette. Heh.
I like (generally) a girl with meat on the bones. If she's gonna be thin, she's gotta have some meat-on-the-bones features. Like... well, okay. Boobies! Yes. Boobies are good. And I likes me some legs that I *can't* get my fingers around. And an ass that requires more than a napkin to cover? Hmmm? Smarts <b>really</b> helps, but can think a women is fall out of my chair beautiful even if she doesn't have a brain. It just lowers the attraction level a bit. A lot. |
Quote:
If this is the case, then major allowances must be made on account of her excellent taste. |
They have nice bodies, although their faces aren't so hot. And if the face isn't there, forget it. I can't put a flag over them and fuck them for glory.
|
Whaddya, work at a Hooters 'noid?
|
Let's not be crude, guys. They're all God's children and therefore beautiful. Of course the one's that are built like brick shithouses may be a tad more beautiful.;)
|
Heh.
Of course beauty comes from within. But let's be serious here - your marriage is going to suck if there isn't physical attraction as well. For the most part, if you can't sport wood thinking about them doing naughty things to you, don't bother. |
Okay, whatever.
I think this is about the prettiest face I've ever seen though. http://d.gaveup.org/lacey/holyjesus-1.jpg She earns bonus points for having a part on The Family Guy. |
Quote:
|
I agree.
The first woman is not pretty because she has no unique features. The second woman has a god-awful bathing suit on, huge teeth, and too much makeup. You can also see her ribs. The third woman just looks completely fake. I don't care how pretty she is.. that personality trait is revolting. It cancels out any physical attractiveness. The brunette looks completely unexcited and depressed. She's also got too much makeup on. Why is she so down? Did someone die? These are just my opinions, though. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.