The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Arts & Entertainment (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   The Best Rock Band of All Time (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=4412)

lumberjim 11-20-2003 07:16 PM

The Best Rock Band of All Time
 
It is my contention that Led Zeppelin is by far the best overall rock band ever.

Here's why:

1. Good song/ bad song ratio
10 albums.....maybe 5 bad songs in total and they were mostly on presence and in through the out door

2. Power
They move me

3. Versatility
They cover all the bases. rock, heavy metal, regae, ballads, folk, country( appropriately only 1 song)

4. Lifestyle
They tore hotels up, abused groupies, and created general mayhem wherever they went

5. Formula
2 front men and a super talented rythm section ( this is the model for most successful bands today)

6. Timelessness
their songs still rock, and bear repetition

7. Longevity
11 years at the top

some of the other big 4 have some of these factors, but none have it all.

SteveDallas 11-20-2003 07:33 PM

You left out an "ummm... who?" choice on your poll! :cool:

slang 11-21-2003 01:21 AM

This "Led Zeppelin" fellow sounds pretty good by your description.

Maybe I'll see if there are any bootleg songs on the net by him.

be-bop 11-21-2003 03:24 PM

Best rock band
 
"Led Zep" were a great band,but the thing is they are no more
(Mores the pity)So I think the Stones just shade it for me.
On a good night they can blast anything off stage...

Elspode 11-22-2003 07:18 AM

This poll is inherently unfair to old people like me. My sentimental favorite is The Who, as they are my all-time favorite band. But greatness is measured by more than my personal preferences, and it is difficult for me to find an argument against choosing the Fab Four. IMHO, there is no such thing as a bad Beatles song, period. They had terrific range of style when they chose to use it, and each subsequent album they released showed clear growth and forward movement, even to the point of defining a genre.

I didn't include the hotel-trashing criteria, because it is irrelevant to the music, but had I used it, The Who would probably have come out on top for me.

Undertoad 11-22-2003 07:20 AM

I don't think the Beatles were really rock anyway.

And Radiohead is missing from the list.

Elspode 11-22-2003 07:38 AM

They were rock...and much more.

Beatles rock songs (not a complete list, by any means):

Back in the USSR
Revolution
Birthday
Everybody's Got Something to Hide (cept for me and my monkey)
Get Back
Come Together
Glass Onion
I Want You
Savoy Truffle
...and about half of their early work.

You could make a good argument for them not having been a *hard* rock group, though.

slang 11-22-2003 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Undertoad
I don't think the Beatles were really rock anyway.
What would you classify them as?

Undertoad 11-22-2003 07:43 AM

Pop.

lumberjim 11-22-2003 08:47 AM

from a purely musical stand point, i still like zeppelin, but i wanted to incorporate the whole picture here. el, you should have voted with your gut....that's what i'm after. all things considered. i think the beatles have several lame songs(their early stuff was just so queer), but i'll need some time to look through and tell you which ones i mean......im at work now, and time is limited.

Elspode 11-22-2003 01:24 PM

The Beatles were a product of British popular music, and their early work reflected that in many cases. Since I personally have always had a very broad appreciation of musical styles, I *admire* the early work of The Beatles. Where others might find their renderings of music from our grandparents, and even great-grandparents' day, *I* think it is proof positive of their genius.

The Beatles were equally comfortable with a wide variety of styles, from Standards to Country to British Music Hall, and on through being one of the progenitors of psychedelica.

Doesn't get much better than that, IMHO.

Griff 11-22-2003 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elspode
Doesn't get much better than that, IMHO.
Only the Monkees did it better than the Beatles.

elSicomoro 11-22-2003 03:31 PM

UT, I'd say the pre-1965 Beatles is pop, but 1965-70 is definitely rock.

Let's make the case for Radiohead though, based on Jimbo's factors:

1. Very rarely do they make a bad song....not even "Fitter happier" could be considered bad.

2. One need to only see Thom Yorke on stage to see the power of the band.

3. Britpop to grunge-like to electronic to straight ahead rock to jazzy.

4. Cool and collected--people seem to be in awe of them.

5. 5 guys taking music all over the place.

6. "Creep" still sounds as good today as it did in 1993. Their songs could easily fit anywhere into the last 20 years of music...maybe 30.

7. 10 years, 6 critically acclaimed CDs that actually sell well with minor radio and video play.

Another person not listed that also fits the criteria: Bowie

lumberjim 11-22-2003 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sycamore


Another person not listed that also fits the criteria: Bowie

are you out of your goddamn mind?



ps syc, title suggestion: "list maven"


One entry found for maven.
Main Entry: ma·ven
Variant(s): or ma·vin /'mA-v&n/
Function: noun
Etymology: Yiddish meyvn, from Late Hebrew mEbhIn
Date: circa 1952
: one who is experienced or knowledgeable : EXPERT; also : FREAK 4

Undertoad 11-22-2003 04:03 PM

The pre-1965 Beatles is "rock n roll".

Rubber Soul and Revolver are the transitional albums, rock-n-roll with pop infused

Sgt Pepper's = pure pop
Magical Mystery Tour = pure pop
White Album = rock
Abbey Road = bridges rock and pop with psychedelia
Let It Be: pop

Enough said


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.