Look Who is in the New York Times
 

Yes, it's worth the registration this time out.

Gay and Republican, but Not Necessarily Disloyal to President

Congratulations on hitting the big time!!!

I'd really like to see Maggie start a discussion thread on this. Very intriguing!

I can't decide if I'm more offended by the attempt to ammend this to the constitution or by the way they bandy around the idea as a political tool.

Imagine the furor if the Pope was to say, "I think it is vitally important that we find a new means to strengthen the idea of marriage. I've decided to create a Bull to allow homosexual marriage to be recognized by the Roman Catholc Church."

Why would there be a furor? By definition, what the Pope says, goes, for the Roman Catholic Church. After all, it would have no relevance for governments (excpet those that are officially Catholic) or other religious bodies.

It's NEVER worth the registration

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/09/po...partner=GOOGLE

Why does your link have a a google reference as opposed to the original link? Just wonderin'.

I knew that she was a member of that org., but seeing it in writing...after reading it, I heard:

[joancrawford]"Don't FUCK with me, fellaaaaas!!!!!"[/joancrawford]

*sorry...low blood pressure has me feelin' all high today...*:D

Eh, call me crazy, but I thought that Maggie was:

1) Bisexual
2) Libertarian

I talked to Mags today. She has no time for the Cellar for now due to a hectic home life and the sheer volume of postings these days.

Maybe we'll get to see her again at Plastic Forks this year.

Brian

Was she finally able to find a job?

Not yet. :(