06-03-2013, 04:16 PM | #1 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Miracle Drugs
Miracle Drugs, a much overused expression. But if you need them to fix you up, I guess they are a miracle. But it seems if you need cancer drugs, it may take a miracle to get them.
Quote:
But hey, it's not personal, it's business.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
06-03-2013, 04:41 PM | #2 |
Not Suspicious, Merely Canadian
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,774
|
It would appear obvious, here, to champion a system like that in Canada over the 'business first' American one. Unfortunately, getting new drugs past multiple bureaucratic committees that are trying to manage capped global health budgets means that Canadians often wait longer for new drugs. This happened with tamoxifen long after it was standard treatment in the US.
I don't know that there's a good answer. I'd think that pharm companies conducting clinical trials would at least want to have enough of their new drug available to give the study statistical significance, but stranger things have happened. And not all new 'miracle drugs' end up fulfilling their promise by any means. I am still very relieved to have been here for my cancer treatment rather than in my native country. Which is not to say that everything is better here or worse there. But for imminently life-threatening issues I'm glad to be here.
__________________
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. - Ghandi |
06-03-2013, 04:58 PM | #3 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I can see the problem and delays with getting new drugs approved.
I got the impression they were talking about drugs that had been approved and we supposed to be available, especially generic drugs.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
06-03-2013, 05:09 PM | #4 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
We already have those committees, whether they're in the FDA or in a multitude of insurance companies.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
06-30-2013, 10:06 AM | #5 | ||
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Here is a medical news topic that may well fit in this thread...
The headlines are current popular media are startling, and may even generate visions of ménage à trois, But the actual technique is more like supplying a miracle drug to prevent a very rare (orphan) disease being inherited by a baby from its mother. There are lots of ethical issues too, but it is an issue that will probably be decided in the UK via the popular press. University of Oxford Practical Ethics Paula Boddington June 29, 2013 Three person IVF Quote:
Quote:
There are a couple of ways of doing the new procedures, involving 3 persons (#1, #2, and #3 below) Basically the new proposed techniques take the nuclear DNA of a egg from the affected mother[#1] and from the father [#2]. A donated egg is also taken from a non-affected woman [#3], Its nuclear DNA is removed, leaving behind healthy mitochondrial DNA. The nuclear DNA of the two parents is then transplanted into the body of the healthy egg, resulting in an egg which has the DNA of the father and the affected mother, and the mitochondrial DNA from the donor woman. Pic from here *167 Last edited by Lamplighter; 06-30-2013 at 10:11 AM. |
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|