![]() |
|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
There are usually local taxes as well, so the sum of federal, state, and local taxes varies by location.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | ||||
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
Never said I thought it was a reasonable number. It's just the number everyone talks about and the government seems to have fixated upon.
Okay then, maybe a decent living. You aren't hurting for the essentials in any case. I agree. Based on what you said above, you can get an apartment that is 180 sq. ft. on $50k per year in Manhattan. In Montana, that's a 1,200 sq. ft. apartment most places, a decent vacation and plenty of recreation. Anyway, whatever monetary concerns your "quality of life" entails can probably be met here with $50k per year (unless you need a Lamborghini and a second home in Aspen). Quote:
Second, I think it would be awesome if we had a little earth in a bubble where we could accurately run simulations with variables like this changed. Eventually, we may get there. So you think it's a good idea for it to be a fixed percent across the board? If I'm earning at less than half the poverty line I should pay the same, let's say, 10% as the guy making $500k per year? In the extreme example, you could drop my tax completely and just up the $500k person's rate by .000002%. That extra thousand dollars might make an enormous difference in my life. The rich guy isn't going to be impacted much at all. I think the tax percentage should be based on current income in relation to other incomes in your area and the potential to make more money in the prevailing economic conditions. I'm a software developer so these little complex thought experiments are fun for me :P |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |||||||
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
I don't necessarily have a problem with the idea that everyone should pay something, but that's not mutually exclusive to the idea of a progressive taxation scale either. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
I can't support the notion of progressive taxation. It would be smarter to flatten it out and remove the deductions that most really rich people get to takes. What ever "rich" is....
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
With a system sufficiently simple we could get rid of the IRS, and outsource to commercial collections agencies.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Good idea, then the trashman could break some fingers and kneecaps on his regular route. The trashman knows your standard of living better than most. Save fuel, very efficient, green solution.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|