![]() |
![]() |
#511 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Does the AZ law go beyond that? In another case, the Court of Appeals ruled that “Hispanic appearance is not, in general, an appropriate factor” for determining suspicion, especially in areas with large Hispanic populations." United States v. Montero-Camargo Another precedent perhaps, not directly on immigration, but on the issue of supremacy clause and the matter of sedition (catching commies, not illegals): Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#512 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Well, until then, I would hope that AZ can conduct it's business without interference from the Feds. Further, the sooner the other border states join AZ the better. Maybe the Feds will be pushed to control the borders.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#513 | |
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
Quote:
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#514 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I provide the link to the case involving the supremacy clause that may has as much precedent as those cases you cited...the issue of a state sedition law (as opposed to immigration law). You want more cases involving the supremacy clause, I'll be happy to find them....where state laws have been struck down because the federal law was overriding.
The one I cited may or may not be cited as precedent....just as those you cited may or may not. How many times do I have to say that IMO, it is for the federal courts to make that determination. Neither one of us or others who have expressed opinions are experts. Why not let the the federal judiciary do what the Constitution expressly charges it to do? |
![]() |
![]() |
#515 | |
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
You provided a link to a blog... that has some other links to some bills...
Quote:
I have provided links to supreme court cases wich rule that specific immigration issues, not relating to commerce, are considered a police matter and are within a state's right to legislate. You said a later ruling refuted that. I would like a link to that case.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#516 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I also provided a link to an Appeals Court ruing (the most recent) that a state cant use race to determine "reasonable suspicion" And I am still not clear if you even support the idea that the federal judiciary should make the legal determination as the Constitution suggests when laws involve the U.S govt....or if you think the AZ law should be accepted on faith or because its popular. added: On another immigration issue, the Court did strike down a Texas law that attempted to deny education to children who were illegal immigrants....not on the basis of the supremacy clause, but equal protection. Plyler v. Doe Last edited by Redux; 06-29-2010 at 07:17 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#517 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For the record:
Quote:
BTW, the buzz is that the DoJ might announce its filing with the court tomorrow after Obama gives a speech on immigration reform. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#519 |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#520 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#521 |
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
I think the assumption of an accent simply because of his outward physical appearance smacks of racism... where's my lawyer?
![]()
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#522 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
And how come that Uncle Sam has such a big nose?
![]()
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#523 |
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
I thought it was Ted Kennedy.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#524 |
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
|
I'm not sure that's Uncle Sam. It's like Uncle Durante or something.
Skidamarink a dinky dink, Skidamarink a doo (my grandma used to sing that to me.) ![]()
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice. --Bill Cosby |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#525 | |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
Link and a copy of his testimony from 2002. I think Mr. Stoddard makes some excellent points and rebukes a lot of the political banter from both sides.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|