The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2010, 05:42 PM   #1921
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
First it is biased because it came from a congressional economist and the CBO was instructed to refigure how the jobs were tallied. If it comes from the government you have to consider that they are trying to cover their asses for the amount of money that they spent, taxpayer dollars, have to be justified to the public. I see it as nothing more than propaganda. And don't forget they are about to try to spend another boat load of taxpayer dollars with no promise that things will work out in the end they way they have sold it.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 06:33 PM   #1922
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
Well, maybe I'm Rebbeca of Sunnybrook Farm, but I have to accept data from the best non-partisan source out there, and the CBO fills the role better than some left or right wing blog. They do not appear to be overly optimistic to me. They say unemployment will continue at 10% for the first half of 2010 and then fall maybe a half percent by the end of the year. Where's the propaganda in that. They also say Obama's budget would result in a deficit of 1.3 trillion. Where's the mindless optimism there?
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 07:00 PM   #1923
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Because the CBO only produces information based on data that it is fed, by the Obama administration.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 08:18 PM   #1924
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Because the CBO only produces information based on data that it is fed, by the Obama administration.
The Congressional Budget Office was created in 1974 BECAUSE Congress needed a source of honest data divorced from the Executive Branch. Due to the Nixon adminstration, both parties in Congress decided Congressed needed data that the Executive branch could not distort. The CBO's job is to provide data that can confirm or contradict what the Executive Branch claims.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:29 PM   #1925
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am still trying to understand how job data provided by the thousands of recipients of stimulus funds, as required by the recovery act - construction companies, police departments, turkey processing plants, etc - which serve as the basis for the CBO analysis, is Obama administration (government) data and/or government propaganda.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:47 PM   #1926
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Hey Redux, you should take a look at this thread. I wager you've never seen it, because you never, ever leave the Politics forum. There's a whole Cellar community outside of politics, and just like in real life, if you actually get to know folks on a variety of levels, you'll find yourself being given more credibility (or at least tolerant leeway) on the topics that you care passionately about.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:51 PM   #1927
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
I don't see how Redux's mild comment warrents being linked to complaints about the nasty doings in the politics forum. The fact that Merc and C-man post elsewhere in the Cellar doesn't make many of their posts here any more pleasant.
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:58 PM   #1928
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Hey Redux, you should take a look at this thread. I wager you've never seen it, because you never, ever leave the Politics forum. There's a whole Cellar community outside of politics, and just like in real life, if you actually get to know folks on a variety of levels, you'll find yourself being given more credibility (or at least tolerant leeway) on the topics that you care passionately about.
Clod...people participate in forums for a variety of reasons. Mine is to discuss the important issues of the day; others have their owns reasons and I wont suggest where they direct their attention.

I have no problem acknowledging that I am part of the problem in the political discussions and if i continue to post here, I will try to do better and refrain from personal attacks.

I thought my post above yours was a simple straight-forward question in the form of a comment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:59 PM   #1929
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
I'm sorry SamIam, Are you referring to my calling out other posters on their BS, hypocrisy or my having to defend myself from the onslaught over the last few months? Please stop. I'm really trying NOT to post here.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:00 PM   #1930
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamIAm
I don't see how Redux's mild comment warrents being linked to complaints about the nasty doings in the politics forum. The fact that Merc and C-man post elsewhere in the Cellar doesn't make many of their posts here any more pleasant.
Yeah, wtf?

Those who are interested in what redux knows about politics don't really give a flying rat's ass what food he's embarrassed to like or what's mildly irritating him today.

Does this backlash against the politics forums (which, apparently, don't fall under the "if you don't like it don't read it umbrella) now include a requirement to post in other threads too?

I don't really care. I'm pretty much out, and it's clear that it's better all around, but why do we need to give one of the few people who actually has something to say (something not borne of emotion, like what I do) but has basis in experience and knowlege, in politics a rash of shit for not playing elsewhere?
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:06 PM   #1931
Pico and ME
Are you knock-kneed?
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middle Hoosierland
Posts: 3,549
@Shawnee and SamIam - Geez, I was wondering the same thing. It feels kinda like a pack mentality, doesn't it? What a shame.

FTR - I like Redux and the way he posts and I think he has done very well in dealing with the opposition here. He generally remains civil and sane.
Pico and ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:35 PM   #1932
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
I'm sorry SamIam, Are you referring to my calling out other posters on their BS, hypocrisy or my having to defend myself from the onslaught over the last few months? Please stop. I'm really trying NOT to post here.
Please stop what? Whatever the motive behind them, nasty posts are not pleasant to read. There's nothing wrong with me stating that. If you are trying not to post here, then I suggest you don't read here either because that will only make you want to reply.
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:39 PM   #1933
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
You're right. Perhaps I should just fuck off. Seems like thats the general consensus anyway.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 02:09 PM   #1934
ReDemlicat
Kinda New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Fuck on!
and on and on!

Let's outlaw health insurance. I mean it. Set up a catastrophic illness/injury fund that is paid for by a flat rate tax that everyone pays. And then make group health insurance illegal. Apart from that, get the government out of the medicine business.

You wanna go to the doctor? find one you can afford. Too poor to pay? stay sick....or die.


either that, or make it health care for all ...but make all health care prices government regulated, and affordable. then pay differentials to skilled positions like doctors. individual doctors.

I can't decide
ReDemlicat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 04:46 PM   #1935
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamIAm
I don't see how Redux's mild comment warrents being linked to complaints about the nasty doings in the politics forum. The fact that Merc and C-man post elsewhere in the Cellar doesn't make many of their posts here any more pleasant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123
Yeah, wtf?

Those who are interested in what redux knows about politics don't really give a flying rat's ass what food he's embarrassed to like or what's mildly irritating him today.

Does this backlash against the politics forums (which, apparently, don't fall under the "if you don't like it don't read it umbrella) now include a requirement to post in other threads too?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pico and ME
@Shawnee and SamIam - Geez, I was wondering the same thing. It feels kinda like a pack mentality, doesn't it? What a shame.

FTR - I like Redux and the way he posts and I think he has done very well in dealing with the opposition here. He generally remains civil and sane.
Ah, hell. Look, it had nothing to do with Redux's specific comment, it was just the first time I'd noticed him post since the anti-politics thread went down. Redux himself has complained repeatedly about the fact that no one else calls Merc and others on their aggressive posting. Part of the reason that happens is because we know these other people, because they are part of the community. There is even a poll devoted to what kind of asshole TheMercenary is, and yet he's a member of the community. I, for the record, do care about what foods Redux is embarrassed to like, or what's mildly irritating him today, or what hobbies he has, or any of a myriad of things that don't involve politics. I'm not sure why anyone who reads those threads wouldn't be at least initially interested in his or anyone else's response on the subject.

I wasn't trying to give him shit, I was trying to invite him to a happier place, with the promise that if others knew him better, they might occasionally participate in his politics discussions, so he wouldn't be faced with such frustrating, single-sided, monotone opposition, which he sure seems to hate. But if he really doesn't want to explore it, that's fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux
Clod...people participate in forums for a variety of reasons. Mine is to discuss the important issues of the day; others have their owns reasons and I wont suggest where they direct their attention.

I have no problem acknowledging that I am part of the problem in the political discussions and if i continue to post here, I will try to do better and refrain from personal attacks.
Sometimes discussing the important issues of the day requires other people. But that's cool, if you're happy with the way things are, go for it.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.