The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2008, 09:12 PM   #61
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliantha View Post
So you are for abortion. Meaning that if someone said to you, do you agree that women should be allowed to have one, you'd say yes. For and against. Yes or no. The aye's have it.
Yes, absolufuckinglootly... If you want to have one, go for it. That is between you and your God. No governmental agency should be able to tell you what to do with your body. Not my problem.

Oh yea, and stay the hell out of my bedroom.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:14 PM   #62
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Originally Posted by Ibram

Who is this person? Can't read a word of it.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 09:54 AM   #63
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliantha View Post
How many people who are conservative on other issues are for abortion?
Define conservative.

Many, if not most, Republican politicians claim to be conservative, when most of them are actually libertarian on social/moral issues, and if the budget deficits with GWB's first 6 years in office are any indication, most Republicans are liberals when it comes to government spending. And as far as I can tell most Republicans who hold national office are in favor of abortion in cases of rape, incest or fetal stem cell research.

There are not many people who are conservative and who are willing to support the rights of the unborn. In this regard the "conservative" position on abortion is little better than the "liberal" position on abortion- both are in favor of killing the unborn for convenience's sake. But abortion is a moral, life and death issue. It transcends politics.
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 09:58 AM   #64
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
I am not for abortion. I am for a womans right to choose to have complete and utter control over her own body, including her right to terminate a pregnacy if she so chooses. Not my business.
Doesn’t a woman yield control over her body when she sleeps with a man and thus ends up pregnant?

And does the unborn’s father have any rights? The unborn is just as much part of the father’s body as it is the woman’s. Furthermore, are you in favor of child support requirements? If a man has no right to keep a woman from killing his child in utero, what right can the woman have to make the man pay child support if she chooses to let the child live?
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:13 AM   #65
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaja View Post
Doesn’t a woman yield control over her body when she sleeps with a man and thus ends up pregnant?
Most certainly, in some cases yes. That is quite different from an outside entity, such as a government telling her to yield control. It is about free choice.

Quote:
And does the unborn’s father have any rights?
I guess that would depend on the relationship with the mother. Hell we can't even get people to assume any rights so much as want them and take responsibility for their actions. In this country the answer is that the fathers have significantly less rights than the women when it comes to the pregnancy.

Quote:
Furthermore, are you in favor of child support requirements?
Yes, for men and women equally. Equal responsibility, esp if one remarries.

Quote:
If a man has no right to keep a woman from killing his child in utero, what right can the woman have to make the man pay child support if she chooses to let the child live?
Apples and oranges. They two subjects are hardly related.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:14 AM   #66
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Is this a thread for discussing partisan politics or engaging in partisan politics?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:20 AM   #67
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:31 AM   #68
smoothmoniker
to live and die in LA
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
Yeah, it's amazing how quickly this thread went meta on it's own theme. I dig it, kind of like a post-modern literary art installation, only on the interwebs.
__________________
to live and die in LA
smoothmoniker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:35 AM   #69
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaja View Post
Medical malpractice is not the same thing as political debate on political issues. Furthermore, in the U.S. whenever a doctor wants to prescribe, or even just give the patient the option of having, a treatment that is not 100% foolproof, the patient must sign a waiver whereby the doctor cannot be held liable in a malpractice suite.
Actually that is done for all invasive procedures and experimental treatments. None of that removes the patients right to sue or prevents them from suing sucessfully.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 02:55 PM   #70
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Doesn’t a woman yield control over her body when she sleeps with a man and thus ends up pregnant?
No. She changes her physical state, but that doesn't mean she relinquishes control over her body. If a woman is giving birth, she gets to choose how and she gets to choose what medical assistance she will or will not have. All these things are the woman's decision. They weren't always, of course.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:28 PM   #71
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Most certainly, in some cases yes. That is quite different from an outside entity, such as a government telling her to yield control. It is about free choice.
Unless rape or incest is involved, the woman has already yielded control over her body to someone else when she got pregnant. Why should she be entitled to reclaim what she had willfully given up just because a baby is involved?
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:31 PM   #72
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Actually that is done for all invasive procedures and experimental treatments. None of that removes the patients right to sue or prevents them from suing sucessfully.
My mother has Medicare because she is disabled and gets SSI (lupus). She has no choice but to get treatment at the local government hospital. That hospital won’t treat anybody that won’t sign a waiver whereby they specifically give up their right to sue if malpractice of any sort takes place.
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:31 PM   #73
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Unless rape or incest is involved, the woman has already yielded control over her body to someone else when she got pregnant.
In what way has she given up control and to whom?
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:33 PM   #74
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
No. She changes her physical state, but that doesn't mean she relinquishes control over her body. If a woman is giving birth, she gets to choose how and she gets to choose what medical assistance she will or will not have. All these things are the woman's decision. They weren't always, of course.
Letting a man put his penis in her does not give the man control over her body? Get real.
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:35 PM   #75
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Letting a man put his penis in her does not give the man control over her body? Get real.
Holy shit. Well that's an interesting take on it, flaja, it really is.

Of course, in your post you said she gave up that control when she got pregnant, not when she had sex. Do you believe women lose the right to control their bodies when they have sex?
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.