The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Images > Image of the Day
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-25-2003, 01:19 PM   #1
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
11/25/2003: Rivers on Mars redux



Was there flowing water on Mars? Scientists think yes, though not because of the "canals" that some people used to think might be evidence. (Trying to remember: was this ever taught as a working theory?)

This image serves as proof to the people who work on such things, that Mars not only had water but "meandering" water. The delta pattern seems to be the standard sort of delta that might occur after a river deposits stuff over time.

So, are we looking at a Martian Louisiana of millions of years ago? (Would there be Martian Cajuns? Would they look like James Carville?)

The full story. (And thanks to whomever sent me this one...)

(This image also fits into the "Earth as Art" category, except that it's Mars.)
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 02:40 PM   #2
tjennings
Belt Conveyor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sioux City, IA
Posts: 66
Or it could be a macro image of someone's stucco.
__________________
No, no, you're not thinking, you're just being logical.
Niels Bohr, physicist (1885-1962)
tjennings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 03:26 PM   #3
Bill S.
Non-Newbie Sort
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lancaster, Ca
Posts: 6
Cool

maybe its a bad case of acne on a dogs ass.
__________________
divndude
Bill S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 04:13 PM   #4
Riddil
Management Consultant
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 165
I've never understood the real *reason* behind arguing whether or not Mars had running water. It seems immaterial.

I believe I read somewhere that even at the poles which have frozen water (and a few frozen gases, to boot), that in the "martian summer" it will actually become warm enough for some of the ice to melt. At which point it goes directly from solid ice to a gas, since the atmospheric pressure on Mars is far too low to sustain water in a liquid form when it becomes that warm.

If that statement is true, then for there to be running water at that magnitude it would mean that Mars at that time would have had to have a much higher atmospheric pressure... something difficult to do considering the gravity of the planet can't really sustain a dense stratosphere.

(Of course, my entire argument is based on the bits I remember from HS science courses and a smattering of knowledge I gleaned from my college meteorology course... when I was actually awake. Sadly enough, considering how infrequently that was and how long ago it was, it should be noted that I'm far from an expert in the field)
Riddil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 05:42 PM   #5
Sperlock
Elite Elitist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 322
<obscure> And apparently we can also see that there are no Ballrooms on Mars. </obscure>
__________________
Every oak tree started out as a couple of nuts who stood their ground. - Anonymous
http://informationthreshold.blogspot.com, http://spiritualthreshold.blogspot.com
Sperlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 05:52 PM   #6
juju
no one of consequence
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
Welcome to the Cellar, Bill!

So, are you a Biology teacher? If so, how do you like it?
juju is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 07:18 PM   #7
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally posted by Riddil
I've never understood the real *reason* behind arguing whether or not Mars had running water. It seems immaterial.

I believe I read somewhere that even at the poles which have frozen water (and a few frozen gases, to boot), that in the "martian summer" it will actually become warm enough for some of the ice to melt. At which point it goes directly from solid ice to a gas, since the atmospheric pressure on Mars is far too low to sustain water in a liquid form when it becomes that warm.

If that statement is true, then for there to be running water at that magnitude it would mean that Mars at that time would have had to have a much higher atmospheric pressure... something difficult to do considering the gravity of the planet can't really sustain a dense stratosphere.

(Of course, my entire argument is based on the bits I remember from HS science courses and a smattering of knowledge I gleaned from my college meteorology course... when I was actually awake. Sadly enough, considering how infrequently that was and how long ago it was, it should be noted that I'm far from an expert in the field)
They had it all and then they invented SUVs.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 10:01 PM   #8
Nothing But Net
Professor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 1,481
I just happened to notice that if you exchange "Poland", or variations, for "Mars" in Riddil's post, it still makes perfect sense!

Quote:
Originally posted by Riddil
I've never understood the real *reason* behind arguing whether or not Poland had running water. It seems immaterial.

I believe I read somewhere that even at the poles which have frozen water (and a few frozen gases, to boot), that in the "<i>Polish</i> summer" it will actually become warm enough for some of the ice to melt. At which point it goes directly from solid ice to a gas, since the atmospheric pressure on <i>Poland</i> is far too low to sustain water in a liquid form when it becomes that warm.

If that statement is true, then for there to be running water at that magnitude it would mean that <i>Poland</i> at that time would have had to have a much higher atmospheric pressure... something difficult to do considering the gravity of the planet can't really sustain a dense stratosphere.

(Of course, my entire argument is based on the bits I remember from HS science courses and a smattering of knowledge I gleaned from my college meteorology course... when I was actually awake. Sadly enough, considering how infrequently that was and how long ago it was, it should be noted that I'm far from an expert in the field)
Nothing But Net is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2003, 03:48 AM   #9
Bitman
cellar smellar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: californy, baby!
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally posted by Riddil
If that statement is true, then for there to be running water at that magnitude it would mean that Mars at that time would have had to have a much higher atmospheric pressure... something difficult to do considering the gravity of the planet can't really sustain a dense stratosphere.
Funny, PBS just had a show that discussed this. There's some concern that the Earth's magnetic field is flipping. (The field acts as a planetary shield, deflecting all the crap the sun keeps sneezing at us.) In about a thousand years, the north pole will be in the south, and south in the north. In between, we'll have lots of mini-poles wandering around, confusing whole generations of cub scouts.

While analysing the Earth's mantle, they discovered that it's fluid state is key to the magnetic field. They theorized that in the distant past, Mars may have had a thicker atmosphere, with running water and happy bunnies. But the core cooled too much, and its field faded, and the solar wind blew most of the atmostphere away.

Shields up! Anyone know if Santa is polish?
Bitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2003, 08:40 AM   #10
Hubris Boy
Keymaster of Gozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Patapsco Drainage Basin
Posts: 471
Re: 11/25/2003: Rivers on Mars redux

Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
Would there be Martian Cajuns? Would they look like James Carville?
You're almost there, dude. Keep following the clues.
Hubris Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2003, 01:38 PM   #11
Uryoces
2nd Covenant, yo
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pugetropolis
Posts: 583
We might want to terraform Mars. Basically, we release greenhouse gases into Mars' atmosphere, and increase it's ability to trap heat. The theory is that the carbon dioxide could be liberated from the poles and the soil, and that plants would be able to convert it to oxygen for our use.

Robert Zubrin is an birlliant, inspired nutbar who could be considered an authority on Mars.
__________________
The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out.
Uryoces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2003, 03:34 AM   #12
Whit
Umm ... yeah.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 949
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Also, if there was water on the surface there is a greater chance of water being under the surface at a point where we could pump it out. Which would make a manned Mars landing far easier.
__________________
A friend will help you move. A true friend will help you move a body.
Whit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2003, 08:01 AM   #13
onetrack
Coronation Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 99
It can't possibly be Mars .. I can't see any Martians waving .......

Another thought ... if they landed a spacecraft there .. and it promptly sunk outa sight in a Martian version of a Louisiana swamp .. at least all the space experts could cry .. "we were right!! .. all the while, lamenting the loss of the spacecraft that could have given them more vital info .. like how deep the water was ........
onetrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2003, 05:50 PM   #14
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Well, they would know it's deeper than the ship is high.
Welcome to the Cellar onetrack. We can always use another smartass.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2003, 09:08 PM   #15
Hubris Boy
Keymaster of Gozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Patapsco Drainage Basin
Posts: 471
The Martians were probably saying the same things when Carville's ship crash-landed in Lake Pontchartrain.
Hubris Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.