|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-04-2009, 08:47 PM | #16 |
Your Bartender
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly Burbs, PA
Posts: 7,651
|
It drives me up the wall. I hate it.
But I also feel that there are very few things ruder than calling attention to another person's rudeness. And so with grammar--I'd certainly never go around correcting shop signs or something. I just let it go, as much as it grates sometimes. Now, I can hear certain of you accusing me of being a "Grammar Nazi." here. I admit, I can't resist if it results in a pun or double entendres. I could write more on this, but I'm tired. I have another screed coming on that I think may relate this subject to certain TV trends. I'll just finish by saying: the idea that any alleged increase in aggressive pedantry is somehow related to the economy or any other crap that's going on is just silly. |
02-08-2009, 09:26 PM | #17 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
Quote:
Commas are among the fuzziest of punctuation to use well. Too many think they're in there to breathe on and that's it. ..."GREENGROCERS' APOSTROPHES -- ASSORTED COLOURS"
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
|
02-08-2009, 09:29 PM | #18 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
Quote:
Really, if you write the English of an educated man, where's the downside for anyone reading it?
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
|
02-08-2009, 09:54 PM | #19 |
Aggregate Aggravator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 17
|
Having worked with people for whom English is a second language, I'd just like to point out that I'm grateful when I can get the gist of what they're saying. That said, I've had to strive to ensure that most formal communications I get are vetted thoroughly to ensure that they really mean what they say if the subject is complicated beyond a brief thought.
Here's one from a former Director I reported to: "Should be do imp PRD?" That'was typical. I find I really don't care about the grammar or spelling as long as the purpose is clear. One of the problems with email is that folks limit their attention to what is written last. It's rare in the corporate world that people quote in the context of the message sent. One of my pet peeves is typing up a detailed reply *without top posting* and have someone dash off a one sentence reply that indicates they haven't read it. While we're on the subject, the spelling and grammar checkers are another problem in that people tend to make the assumption that it's gotta be correct if it passed. I'm off my soapbox, dammit. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|