The WTF NSFW thread - Page 50

xoxoxoBruce · 03-10-2007, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Well there's the whole grow-er vs show-er aspect

/grow-er m-self
//but would well prepare before a publicity photo like this

And self esteem should be divorced from either.
Same goes for boob size, ladies.

Kagen4o4 · 03-10-2007, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ibram

Wait, that's well-hung?

Thank you for drastically improving my self-esteem.

spode was talking about the horse.

Elspode · 03-10-2007, 04:41 PM

Ah, but the lad is uncircumcised, and from the appearnce, 'twould appear he didn't fluff much, if at all.

SteveDallas · 03-10-2007, 05:30 PM

Ohhhhh, Wilbur!

Kagen4o4 · 03-10-2007, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveDallas

Ohhhhh, Wilbur!

"thats not a carrot!"

Sundae · 03-11-2007, 12:29 PM

Am I the only one to assume it's shopped?
The legs don't match the arms imo and despite Equus covering this topic, how likely is it a young actor would allow these publicity shots to circulate? In the play he is naked on stage for seconds, not a full frontal, stand still and show it off....

The only official shots I've seen have ended at the top of the pubic line. Even if full length shots were taken I'd expect him to wear a modety pouch.

Sorry to be a wet blanket and all that - seeing cock on WTF NSFW is appreciated regardless.... Disparity in nudity as previously mentioned

lumberjim · 03-11-2007, 12:59 PM

i wasn't about to stare at it long enough to tell if it was shopped or not. i think i need to take the homophobe blasphemy challenge or something. i tell my self i'm not a homophobe, but i recoiled from that picture.

Elspode · 03-11-2007, 01:04 PM

Well, now that you mention it, SG...I think you're right. The legs are far more muscular than the upper body, plus the resolution of the torso just isn't right in comparison with the hips to legs.

Trilby · 03-11-2007, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim

i recoiled from that picture.

I was stoic and stared and stared, nay studied that photo, and I am sad to announce that I agree with Sundae. The legs are massive, warrior-like legs; like Russel Crowe in Gladiator...his powerful thighs, capable of vigorous thrusts, potent momentum, breathtaking propulsion and possibly even forceful torque...................

Look. I just don't think those are Harry's thighs and dong. I'd like to think that this unassuming lad is hung like that, as would be a happy surprise for anyone lucky enough to come across it, but I don't think it's his.

limey · 03-11-2007, 02:52 PM

I must confess to only staring at the dong first time around, but now you, er, come ... to mention it, it looks 'shopped to me, too.

xoxoxoBruce · 03-11-2007, 03:05 PM

The picture could have been the original before they cropped it for the public. But cranking it up in Photoshop, I can make out the legs. His right leg (our left) ends before the edge of the frame... like it's jaggedly broken off. The bent leg shows the foot but no trace of the horse down there. He might be blocking the horses leg but that's a stretch.

I'm crushed that he would allow such a thing. Surely he's put a spell on the pictures so people couldn't do that with his permission.

Perry Winkle · 03-11-2007, 03:19 PM

I'd agree it might be photoshopped, but not because of any disparity between upper/lower body.

My upper body is way less developed than my lower body. It's not uncommon, really--look at joggers, bikers, soccerers, etc. Bodybuilders will pump their upper body up to massive proportions, but more fitness-minded people will have more massive legs and moderately proportioned upper bodies.

Just an e.g., I can rep* 500 lb. squats and 1,200 lb. leg presses, but I can't rep more than 225 or so on a bench press.

* our colloq. defn. of rep is that it's an amount you can do several (2+) reps of on at least two sets.

kerosene · 03-11-2007, 03:36 PM

My husband is built kind of that way too, with very strong, large legs. Personally, I like that in a guy much better than the out of proportion giant upper body and small legs look we see so often touted as the ideal.

Flint · 03-11-2007, 04:49 PM

It's a classical (pre-steroid-era) physique, reminiscent of Sandow (pictured below).
The arms and legs are properly proportioned. The leg in question looks bigger because it is foreshortened.

Kagen4o4 · 03-12-2007, 03:57 AM

i hate to bring this up but...is it really going to affect your life that much if you never know what harry potters wand looks like?

oh and nice work grant, show off

03-10-2007, 04:41 PM	#738
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	Ah, but the lad is uncircumcised, and from the appearnce, 'twould appear he didn't fluff much, if at all. __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

03-11-2007, 12:29 PM	#741
Sundae polaroid of perfection Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 24,185	Am I the only one to assume it's shopped? The legs don't match the arms imo and despite Equus covering this topic, how likely is it a young actor would allow these publicity shots to circulate? In the play he is naked on stage for seconds, not a full frontal, stand still and show it off.... The only official shots I've seen have ended at the top of the pubic line. Even if full length shots were taken I'd expect him to wear a modety pouch. Sorry to be a wet blanket and all that - seeing cock on WTF NSFW is appreciated regardless.... Disparity in nudity as previously mentioned __________________ Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac

03-11-2007, 12:59 PM	#742
lumberjim I can hear my ears Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 25,571	i wasn't about to stare at it long enough to tell if it was shopped or not. i think i need to take the homophobe blasphemy challenge or something. i tell my self i'm not a homophobe, but i recoiled from that picture. __________________ This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan

03-11-2007, 01:04 PM	#743
Elspode When Do I Get Virtual Unreality? Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Raytown, Missouri Posts: 12,719	Well, now that you mention it, SG...I think you're right. The legs are far more muscular than the upper body, plus the resolution of the torso just isn't right in comparison with the hips to legs. __________________ "To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog

03-11-2007, 02:52 PM	#745
limey Encroaching on your decrees Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: An island within the south-west coast of Scotland Posts: 7,016	I must confess to only staring at the dong first time around, but now you, er, come ... to mention it, it looks 'shopped to me, too. __________________ Living it up on the edge ... of civilisation, within the southwest coast of

03-10-2007, 05:30 PM	#739
SteveDallas Your Bartender Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Philly Burbs, PA Posts: 7,651	Ohhhhh, Wilbur!

03-11-2007, 03:05 PM	#746
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	The picture could have been the original before they cropped it for the public. But cranking it up in Photoshop, I can make out the legs. His right leg (our left) ends before the edge of the frame... like it's jaggedly broken off. The bent leg shows the foot but no trace of the horse down there. He might be blocking the horses leg but that's a stretch. I'm crushed that he would allow such a thing. Surely he's put a spell on the pictures so people couldn't do that with his permission. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 04-07-2007 at 05:46 PM.

03-11-2007, 03:19 PM	#747
Perry Winkle Esnohplad Semaj Ton Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: A little south of sanity Posts: 2,259	I'd agree it might be photoshopped, but not because of any disparity between upper/lower body. My upper body is way less developed than my lower body. It's not uncommon, really--look at joggers, bikers, soccerers, etc. Bodybuilders will pump their upper body up to massive proportions, but more fitness-minded people will have more massive legs and moderately proportioned upper bodies. Just an e.g., I can rep* 500 lb. squats and 1,200 lb. leg presses, but I can't rep more than 225 or so on a bench press. * our colloq. defn. of rep is that it's an amount you can do several (2+) reps of on at least two sets.

03-11-2007, 03:36 PM	#748
kerosene Touring the facilities Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: The plains of Colorado Posts: 3,476	My husband is built kind of that way too, with very strong, large legs. Personally, I like that in a guy much better than the out of proportion giant upper body and small legs look we see so often touted as the ideal.

03-11-2007, 04:49 PM	#749
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	It's a classical (pre-steroid-era) physique, reminiscent of Sandow (pictured below). The arms and legs are properly proportioned. The leg in question looks bigger because it is foreshortened. Attached Images __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

03-12-2007, 03:57 AM	#750
Kagen4o4 The Sheriff of Nothingland Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Melbourne, Aus Posts: 1,794	i hate to bring this up but...is it really going to affect your life that much if you never know what harry potters wand looks like? oh and nice work grant, show off __________________ something we both can enjoy??

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)