|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-27-2016, 08:57 AM | #16 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
That is an only good strategy when another mocks any intelligent discussion. Again, the bully dirties everyone else in the room who came for intelligent conversation. One need only see the circus call Republican debates. When only the bullies - Cruz and Trump - survived by being belligerent - not cerebral.
|
09-27-2016, 11:45 AM | #17 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
tw,
Don't know if you're criticizin' me, Trump, Clinton, Republicans, Cellar-folk, or some-one or -thing else entirely. |
09-27-2016, 03:59 PM | #18 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
All of the above, it's his style.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
09-28-2016, 11:05 AM | #19 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Nobody is the subject. Subject is what happens when cheapshot artists subvert discussion. Either a wacko extremist must be attacked with similar insults - so that the emotional remain confused. Or a cheapshot artist is permitted to entangle himself when confronted with smarmy and smirky. That latter strategy worked. The Donald eventually became confused, kept interrupting, talked in circles, would not stop talking, admitted he does not pay taxes, admitted to demeaning women by calling them fat (when he is quite portly), and eventually blamed the microphone. A bully dirties everyone in the room. You nor all Republicans nor Democrats nor Putin were listed. Listed was how Trump, Cruz, Hitler, and Berlusconi types so pervert honest discussion. Bullies, throughout mankind's history, dirty everyone in the room. Hitler so successfully obtained power using that technique - as delineated in a book to teach his followers. Also defined is how some confront bullies. Every listener, to be informed, must define which one started 'dirtying' the room and only blame him. Most of us only blame everyone rather than rightly attack the few who make informed discussion impossible. Now, you want names? In Republican debates, Cruz and Trump constantly dirtied the room. Even Christie, who is also a bully, could not keep up. Other and superior politicians were driven from the running by voters who only understand slurs and abuse. Numerous intelligent Republicans (ie Snow, Romney, Dole, et al) have stated their disgust with the party's choice. And rightly so. They are shocked to discover large numbers in their party only see demeaning insults and cheapshots - do not hear intelligent discussion. They were shocked to learn how The Donald found so many lesser educated Republicans who think like him. Mainstream Republicans who are more intelligent are now finding themselves an alienated minority by others who use disparagement to obtain power. A violation of Reagan principles. Persons are not criticized. Criticized is the philosophy and why it works. So many foolishly believe the antagonist. Noted from history are people brought to power only by mockery, insults, and other low brow soundbytes. Those people 'dirty' all honest discussion. Then too many among us blame all participants - not the instigator. 'Persons' are irrelevant here. The philosophy - what 'people' do - is contrasted. Person and people are completely different in this context. |
|
09-29-2016, 08:40 AM | #20 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
"Why assume criticism?"
Cuz that's what it is. |
09-29-2016, 08:58 AM | #21 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
|
09-29-2016, 09:20 AM | #22 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
"Then you are not reading the intent"
Cuz your intent is unclear, as is your explanation of your intent. # "where is one sentence that criticized you?" Where did I say you were critical of 'me'? All I know: you 'are' criticizin'. What I (still) don't know (or get): who or what you're bein' critical of. Meh...chalk it up to my being dumb (cuz, obviously, it has nuthin' to do with you bein' a crappy writer..cuz you're not...a crappy writer, I mean...any one who thinks 'that' is just wrong and wrong-headed...right?). |
09-29-2016, 10:02 AM | #23 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
That last bit (the crappy writer schtick) was unkind and uncalled for...sorry about that.
|
09-30-2016, 11:37 AM | #25 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Sometimes people make this mistake. They assume criticism of a philosophy, concept, proposal, or theory is personal criticism. The concept becomes its own entity - independent of the person who spawned it. |
|
10-01-2016, 01:27 PM | #26 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
*shrug*
Still got no friggin' idea what your point is. You seem to say '*hate the sin, love (or be indifferent to) the sinner' but I'm just guessin'. *a horse manure position to take...the sin only 'is' cuz of the sinner, so -- yeah -- hate the friggin' sinner. |
10-01-2016, 03:00 PM | #27 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
But, but, what if you agree with the "sinner" that what they're doing is not a sin?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
10-02-2016, 07:32 AM | #28 |
polaroid of perfection
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
|
As in, if the "sin" is stopping people keeping slaves, even though the Bible endorses it, do you lovie the man who buys and sells people like cattle, but also love the man who tries to stop it?
Or alternatively, if you believe homosexuality is a sin, how do you separate the person from their desires? Paedophiles can be put in a prison indefinitely to keep them from harming the public, which makes some sense. But the conditions they are kept in are similar to those who deliberately chose and planned to kill another person. You may as well ask, "What is justice and how do we perceive it?" It can't be Biblical, as the Old Testament was supplanted by the New. In this country we hanged people for petty theft, even children. Did it work? Are we theft-free now? Nope. Sorry, wanderings of a bemused mind and in no way connected to Trump.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac |
10-02-2016, 09:06 AM | #29 |
I love it when a plan comes together.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
|
Sounds like you're exploring the idea of letting homosexuals have pedophiles as slaves until one of the group steals something then hang them all.
I suppose that kind of peer pressure might work. |
10-02-2016, 05:47 PM | #30 |
Goon Squad Leader
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
|
Your suggestion that Sundae has a peer is absurd.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|