|
Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-21-2012, 12:38 PM | #16 |
a beautiful fool
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 39.939705
Posts: 4,504
|
I'm disappointed in the music spotify contains for streaming. NO tool. NO white stripes. NO led Zeppelin.
Audio Galaxy is pretty cool. have you checked that app out yet? a
__________________
There's a Shadow just behind me. Shrouding every step I take. Making every promise empty, pointing every finger at me. _tool |
02-21-2012, 01:05 PM | #17 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
No I hear their users are drummers
All legal streaming services are going to have greedhead bands that don't participate. Spotify lets you add your own mp3s into their interface and so if you need them, there they are... I think that's about all I need |
02-21-2012, 01:07 PM | #18 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Appreciate it, but this is a big-ass phone and that is one of the down sides... it doesn't fit much of anything.
There is no charging dock for it yet, in desk or mobile versions, which is weird. |
02-21-2012, 06:26 PM | #19 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
Can you give me a simple breakdown of why Spotify might be superior to Pandora? I don't use either, I've just heard a lot more about Pandora, so I wondered. |
|
02-21-2012, 07:36 PM | #20 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Spotify is more oriented around listening to albums, or playlists that you construct. Pandora is more like a radio service that offers you things it thinks you probably like to listen to, based on what you say you like.
Grooveshark is a less interesting interface (IMO), supports album and playlist play like Spotify, but it is thought to be illegal and may not survive legal challenges. Google, Amazon and Apple all offer ways to stream your own music to your own phone. These support the model where you buy your music first, and you send it to them so they can stream it back to you on demand. I have only tried the Google version. It sucks and remains one of the worst Google products. |
02-23-2012, 05:20 PM | #21 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
This Alarm Clock Xtreme is the stuff. (This app is available for both Android and iPhone)
You figure, an alarm clock for a smartphone, that's no big deal. Well I tell you they have thought of everything. Here is everything: ALARMS You can set as many different alarms, and each can repeat on as many different days of the week as you like. You can select a different ringtone for each alarm. You can set a different message for each alarm. You can set the alarm to start at 0% volume, and slowly increase to 100% any volume level you like. This 0-to-100 volume increase can happen over 60 seconds or even up to 20 minutes if you like. Imagine that, your alarm gently increasing in volume until you notice it and shut it off! I tell you, it is a fine thing, I tell you! SNOOZE You can allow snooze on your alarm, or not. The snooze can be set for any length of time, from 1 minute, to an hour. (If you set it for 9 minutes, I pity you.) You can have the alarm display up two buttons on the screen when it goes off, one for dismiss and one for snooze. Or, you can tell it to snooze when you shake the phone, or press a side button. DISMISS You can also choose to dismiss the alarm when you shake the phone. You can also have it require you to solve a math problem, or enter a CAPTCHA, to dismiss the alarm. I have not tried these features. SAFETY You can force it to play the alarm even if the phone is in quiet mode. You can force it to play the alarm through the phone speaker, even if headphones are plugged into the phone. I tell you, they thought of everything! |
02-23-2012, 05:55 PM | #22 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
But you are a musician. You are also musically and technologically knowledgeable. So my question to you is, are you satisfied with the quality of sound you're getting from your phone/death star?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
02-23-2012, 06:54 PM | #23 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Lemme tell you, a few years ago I took my entire collection of about 800 CDs and ripped them to FLAC, which is exactly the CD in audio quality;
Then I converted the FLAC files to MP3 at various rates. I A-B tested tons of different things, on speakers and different headphones. Above a certain quality of mp3 (128 kpbs) I could not tell a dime's wortha difference between any of 'em. Spotify has low and high quality streaming settings, so you can choose whether to save bandwidth or save your ears. IME the high-quality is CD-quality and the low quality is... kinda acceptable. I understand the high quality is 320kpbs OGG format. That's top notch. |
02-23-2012, 07:02 PM | #24 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Add: Spotify quality settings are documented here:
http://www.spotify.com/us/help/faq/tech/codec-quality/ 320kbps high quality, 160 medium quality, 96 low quality. The first two are what they use for desktop, the last two are what they use for mobile. |
02-23-2012, 07:10 PM | #25 |
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
I think that alarm clock was the amazon.com free app of the day a couple of months ago. I does rock. I actually like the feature that requires you to do increasingly complex math to prove you're awake enough to shut it off.
__________________
wolf eht htiw og "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
02-23-2012, 07:46 PM | #26 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
02-23-2012, 10:14 PM | #27 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Most of the difference comes from the earbuds / speakers in my experience.
|
02-25-2012, 12:40 AM | #28 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Oh, OK. I suppose the phone being all digital and shit, wouldn't affect the music much as log as it had the power to drive the buds.
By the way, did you see the hour long whyy show on Robert Trout?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
02-25-2012, 04:36 AM | #29 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Yea, it seems to me like the fine details of fidelity have been worked out at this point. I think all the ear buds are driven using rare earth magnets so it just takes a sip of power to make them go. Unlike driving a big loudspeaker where huge amounts of power are needed to make bass sounds (my personal specialty), because the speakers have to move a lot of air.
Hey but even that area is changing. I use rare earth neodymium speakers in my bass cabinets because they save weight. And in the last decade it appears they have worked out how to make amps light too. I used to lug around a 45 lb amp in order to get 500 watts per channel, but now the power amps weigh like 15 pounds. I don't know where that difference appeared but my back is glad for it. |
02-25-2012, 08:26 AM | #30 |
Only looks like a disaster tourist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
|
On the down side, last night my wife and I were out for dinner. The family at the next table was using their phone to play cheesy pop music, despite the fact that the restaurant had their own music system going.
It was very discordant, and I thought that there just might be an international incident. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|